Off-Site Harrassment

  • 82 Replies
  • 13715 Views
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 40103
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #60 on: April 12, 2010, 10:40:38 AM »
His intentions are irrelevant, because the information is the same regardless.

In a court of law, intentions can be quite relevant.  Intent can be the difference between self defense and first degree murder, even though the result was the same.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 42409
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #61 on: April 12, 2010, 10:50:14 AM »
Anyone who frequents this website would most likely be disqualified from serving on the jury in the first place.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Catchpa

  • 1018
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #62 on: April 12, 2010, 10:54:15 AM »
His intentions are irrelevant, because the information is the same regardless.

In a court of law, intentions can be quite relevant.  Intent can be the difference between self defense and first degree murder, even though the result was the same.

I know, but not in this scenario.

Whatever Wilmore's intent is, the information provided is still the same. This information could give a jury prejudice.
The conspiracy do train attack-birds

?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6258
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #63 on: April 12, 2010, 10:57:20 AM »
There was NO prejudicial information given by Wilmore.  None.  Zero.  Zippo.  Nada.  Ingen.

Was there a poor attempt by the Crusty person and other like-mined people to make it appear as such?  Yes.

And Space Cowgirl is right, the first question they ask a juror, "Do you know personally anyone connected to any party in this case?"  Answer "yes' and the prospective juror is excused.   Elementary.

What else is new?

*

Catchpa

  • 1018
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #64 on: April 12, 2010, 11:06:10 AM »
There was NO prejudicial information given by Wilmore.  None.  Zero.  Zippo.  Nada.  Ingen.

Was there a poor attempt by the Crusty person and other like-mined people to make it appear as such?  Yes.

And Space Cowgirl is right, the first question they ask a juror, "Do you know personally anyone connected to any party in this case?"  Answer "yes' and the prospective juror is excused.   Elementary.

What else is new?

The information was given before a trial. How is that not prejudicial? (Assuming it means prejudge according to my translator)
The conspiracy do train attack-birds

?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6258
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #65 on: April 12, 2010, 11:14:57 AM »
Do you think being told a person's screen name/alias is somehow prejudicial?  How so?

Do you think being told the charges a person might or might not be facing is somehow prejudicial?  How so?

Good Lord!  A court docket lists all that information well before trial on a PUBLIC bulletin board.  Oh noes!!!  Nobody can ever get a fair trial!!!


*

Catchpa

  • 1018
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #66 on: April 12, 2010, 11:26:34 AM »
Do you think being told a person's screen name/alias is somehow prejudicial?  How so?

Do you think being told the charges a person might or might not be facing is somehow prejudicial?  How so?

Good Lord!  A court docket lists all that information well before trial on a PUBLIC bulletin board.  Oh noes!!!  Nobody can ever get a fair trial!!!

I'd appreciate if you keep yourself civil, like I've kept myself civil by presenting sources in a respectful manner.

It's prejudicial because the information was given before a judge, and it was said beforehand that the suspect in question who used the given screen names, did in fact make those threats.

This can easily go between a lot of grey lines, and if you live in Denmark you'd also have information about a recent case, where a suspect was portrayed by the media as being practically guilty(before proven otherwise). This was a great example of the many grey lines in the law.
The conspiracy do train attack-birds

*

Lord Wilmore

  • Vice President
  • Administrator
  • 12106
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #67 on: April 12, 2010, 11:41:24 AM »
To my knowledge, Ichi received advice regarding his online activity from the police at the time, which is why he stayed away for a couple of months. Ichi asked me to post this information, and I did so in exactly the manner he requested. I'm not saying those two sentences are connected, but even if they aren't, I am neither Ichi's lawyer nor his mother. I did as he requested, and any negative consequences were ultimately his concern.
"I want truth for truth's sake, not for the applaud or approval of men. I would not reject truth because it is unpopular, nor accept error because it is popular. I should rather be right and stand alone than run with the multitude and be wrong." - C.S. DeFord

?

frozen_berries

  • 633
  • Posts: 78231234
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #68 on: April 13, 2010, 09:34:40 AM »
Wow Ichi, just man up and deal with it.
Are you seriously scared of the internet now?
« Last Edit: April 13, 2010, 09:46:52 AM by frozen_berries »

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 42409
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #69 on: April 13, 2010, 01:05:06 PM »
Wow frozen_berries, just man up and lurk moar.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

?

frozen_berries

  • 633
  • Posts: 78231234
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #70 on: April 13, 2010, 02:02:03 PM »
Wow frozen_berries, just man up and lurk moar.


yes sir

Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #71 on: April 24, 2010, 10:33:44 PM »
Wow, shame on that guy.  I can't believe that a joke caused such a problem.  Although, I'm not sure who's more responsible, the one who didn't realize that this is a joke or the one that continued on with the joke until death threats were made.

Either way, it's completely irresponsible.

*

theonlydann

  • Official Member
  • 24172
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #72 on: August 13, 2010, 06:06:51 AM »
Such a nice work indeed.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36115
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #73 on: August 13, 2010, 08:06:00 AM »
Everyone else, stay on topic.  Thats a warning.

Prove it.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

John Davis

  • Secretary Of The Society
  • Administrator
  • 16559
  • Most Prolific Scientist, 2019
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #74 on: August 13, 2010, 08:47:32 AM »
Quantum Ab Hoc

?

Crustinator

  • 7813
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #75 on: August 13, 2010, 12:15:53 PM »
Any word on the progress of this exciting case? The police probably put their best detectives on it we can be sure of that for certain.

*

Saddam Hussein

  • Official Member
  • 35365
  • Former President of Iraq
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #76 on: August 13, 2010, 12:58:55 PM »
Any word on the progress of this exciting case? The police probably put their best detectives on it we can be sure of that for certain.

They did, Brother Crusty.  It wasn't an easy case to crack, as the culprit was a ruthless criminal mastermind who enjoyed steering the police in a deadly psychological struggle of cat-and-mouse.  Eventually, though, one world-weary detective (hopefully played by Al Pacino or Morgan Freeman), shattered by the recent death of his partner, overcame his inner demons and found the strength to solve this case.  The world is safe once more.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36115
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #77 on: August 13, 2010, 01:25:03 PM »
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

?

Horatio

  • Official Member
  • 4016
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #78 on: August 13, 2010, 09:00:14 PM »
Any word on the progress of this exciting case? The police probably put their best detectives on it we can be sure of that for certain.

If the police are intelligent, they probably joined in on the harassment.
How dare you have the audacity to demand my deposition. I've never even heard of you.

*

Saddam Hussein

  • Official Member
  • 35365
  • Former President of Iraq
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #79 on: August 13, 2010, 09:10:15 PM »
Any word on the progress of this exciting case? The police probably put their best detectives on it we can be sure of that for certain.

If the police are intelligent, they probably joined in on the harassment.

Harassing someone is a sign of intelligence?

?

Crustinator

  • 7813
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #80 on: August 14, 2010, 05:11:46 AM »
Any word on the progress of this exciting case? The police probably put their best detectives on it we can be sure of that for certain.

They did, Brother Crusty.  It wasn't an easy case to crack, as the culprit was a ruthless criminal mastermind who enjoyed steering the police in a deadly psychological struggle of cat-and-mouse.  Eventually, though, one world-weary detective (hopefully played by Al Pacino or Morgan Freeman), shattered by the recent death of his partner, overcame his inner demons and found the strength to solve this case.  The world is safe once more.

This is good. news Brother Hussain. As you are all aware I am a shit hot lawyer also who also has amazing sex with hot wimmins but I have interesting underlying character flaws that mean I usually date a new one every week apart from that one who has my babies. Therefore I would like to offer my services to the criminal involved as part of his defence team.

?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6258
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #81 on: August 14, 2010, 10:26:14 AM »
Any word on the progress of this exciting case? The police probably put their best detectives on it we can be sure of that for certain.

They did, Brother Crusty.  It wasn't an easy case to crack, as the culprit was a ruthless criminal mastermind who enjoyed steering the police in a deadly psychological struggle of cat-and-mouse.  Eventually, though, one world-weary detective (hopefully played by Al Pacino or Morgan Freeman), shattered by the recent death of his partner, overcame his inner demons and found the strength to solve this case.  The world is safe once more.

This is good. news Brother Hussain. As you are all aware I am a shit hot lawyer also who also has amazing sex with hot wimmins but I have interesting underlying character flaws that mean I usually date a new one every week apart from that one who has my babies. Therefore I would like to offer my services to the criminal involved as part of his defence team.

Your attempt to steal the magnificent Saddam's thunder by imitation was rated a five/'D' by our panel of judges.  Better luck next time.

?

Crustinator

  • 7813
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: Off-Site Harrassment
« Reply #82 on: August 14, 2010, 01:27:57 PM »
Any word on the progress of this exciting case? The police probably put their best detectives on it we can be sure of that for certain.

They did, Brother Crusty.  It wasn't an easy case to crack, as the culprit was a ruthless criminal mastermind who enjoyed steering the police in a deadly psychological struggle of cat-and-mouse.  Eventually, though, one world-weary detective (hopefully played by Al Pacino or Morgan Freeman), shattered by the recent death of his partner, overcame his inner demons and found the strength to solve this case.  The world is safe once more.

This is good. news Brother Hussain. As you are all aware I am a shit hot lawyer also who also has amazing sex with hot wimmins but I have interesting underlying character flaws that mean I usually date a new one every week apart from that one who has my babies. Therefore I would like to offer my services to the criminal involved as part of his defence team.

Your attempt to steal the magnificent Saddam's thunder by imitation was rated a five/'D' by our panel of judges.  Better luck next time.

lurk moar