what is the conspiracy?

And why?

And why?

Some poeple think nasa wants to make money from fake space research, so they invented a round earth so they can pretend to make rockets and pretend satellites that take pretend photos of the universe and planets.

the conspiracy is imagined. nasa could make far far more money researching a flat earth which defies every known law of nature. it would take science a billion years to uncover the insane laws that account for a flat earth, insane laws like bendly light, giant ice mountains that ring the continents for no particular reason, antimoons that block the moonlight, yet which are unobservable othside of eclipses.

And why?

It's part of the progressive-athiest agenda. Round Earth, big universe = big government programs. (e.g. NASA). Keep in mind the space race started with Sputnik. Do you think the Soviets were telling the truth about anything?  Then the US lost the cold war. Yes, lost! But they have to perpetuate the truth that they won it. Ronald Reagan ran on a platform of less government and instead gave us more via massive spending on fictional technology. But it was good for the economy.  Now we have global warming idiots telling us what to do. So everything went as planned. But um, how can you have global warming if there ISN'T A GLOBE?

The conspiracy is more or less the same as it always has been. The Rothchild's, I mean the central banks, I mean Goldman Sacks kinda runs everything, ya know? 

If people knew there was a flat earth then so much government spending -- of all governments -- that is ostensibly going toward military spending (which is mainly fictional) couldn't end up in the pockets of Wall Street investment bankers.

Is this far-fetched? If you think so, go back to thinking Wall Street exists for the purposes of making the economy more efficient.

Quote from: gomby12 on December 22, 2009, 08:21:17 PM

And why?

It's part of the progressive-athiest agenda. Round Earth, big universe = big government programs. (e.g. NASA). Keep in mind the space race started with Sputnik. Do you think the Soviets were telling the truth about anything?  Then the US lost the cold war. Yes, lost! But they have to perpetuate the truth that they won it. Ronald Reagan ran on a platform of less government and instead gave us more via massive spending on fictional technology. But it was good for the economy.  Now we have global warming idiots telling us what to do. So everything went as planned. But um, how can you have global warming if there ISN'T A GLOBE?

The conspiracy is more or less the same as it always has been. The Rothchild's, I mean the central banks, I mean Goldman Sacks kinda runs everything, ya know? 

If people knew there was a flat earth then so much government spending -- of all governments -- that is ostensibly going toward military spending (which is mainly fictional) couldn't end up in the pockets of Wall Street investment bankers.

Is this far-fetched? If you think so, go back to thinking Wall Street exists for the purposes of making the economy more efficient.

Keep in mind that Newton himself played a large part in the investment scams of his time, such as the South Seas Bubble.

Quote from: gomby12 on December 22, 2009, 08:21:17 PM

And why?

It's part of the progressive-athiest agenda. Round Earth, big universe = big government programs. (e.g. NASA). Keep in mind the space race started with Sputnik. Do you think the Soviets were telling the truth about anything?  Then the US lost the cold war. Yes, lost! But they have to perpetuate the truth that they won it. Ronald Reagan ran on a platform of less government and instead gave us more via massive spending on fictional technology. But it was good for the economy.  Now we have global warming idiots telling us what to do. So everything went as planned. But um, how can you have global warming if there ISN'T A GLOBE?

The conspiracy is more or less the same as it always has been. The Rothchild's, I mean the central banks, I mean Goldman Sacks kinda runs everything, ya know? 

If people knew there was a flat earth then so much government spending -- of all governments -- that is ostensibly going toward military spending (which is mainly fictional) couldn't end up in the pockets of Wall Street investment bankers.

Is this far-fetched? If you think so, go back to thinking Wall Street exists for the purposes of making the economy more efficient.

Very nice! I have to remember this.

how could it be the atheist agenda when the majority of people in our goverment are republican christians. not only that the majority of people on the earth are christian (on the round earth)

how could it be the atheist agenda when the majority of people in our goverment are republican christians. not only that the majority of people on the earth are christian (on the round earth)

Yes, the majority of people are religious. But the majority of people are not running things.

how could it be the atheist agenda when the majority of people in our goverment are republican christians. not only that the majority of people on the earth are christian (on the round earth)

the majority of people in our gov are republicans? haven't paid much attention to politics lately, have you, gomby?