The Conspiracy; Let's Settle This

No one at all?
This thread has been abandoned for a few days now.
Is the FES coming back?

I'm sitll blaming the Hand of Omega for planting false evidence of the conspiracies to prolong scientific debates.

Try and disprove THAT FE'ers.

And I read through the whole thing, and it really frustrated me.

Here's how I interpret it:
1.Toothyp1cks proposes valid debate over conspiracy
2. Tom puts forth valid evidence.
3.RE'ers generally disprove (or discredit) Tom's evidence and asks for more.
4. Tom sits, crosses his arms, and says "I DON"T WANNA!"

Here's how I interpret it:
1.Toothyp1cks proposes valid debate over conspiracy
2. Tom puts forth valid evidence.
3.RE'ers generally disprove (or discredit) Tom's evidence and asks for more.
4. Tom sits, crosses his arms, and says "I DON"T WANNA!"

Quoted for truth.

Also to Tom Bishop:

my father works for NORAD.  You are claiming that NORAD is a lie because they use satellite surveillance.

Prove to me that my father is a liar.

Also to Tom Bishop:

my father works for NORAD.  You are claiming that NORAD is a lie because they use satellite surveillance.

Prove to me that my father is a liar.

Your mother is a dingo.

Quote from: jtelroy on January 11, 2010, 10:54:26 AM

Also to Tom Bishop:

my father works for NORAD.  You are claiming that NORAD is a lie because they use satellite surveillance.

Prove to me that my father is a liar.

Your mother is a dingo.

And you work for the Hand of Omega.

Also to Tom Bishop:

my father works for NORAD.  You are claiming that NORAD is a lie because they use satellite surveillance.

Prove to me that my father is a liar.

Let's not do that okay.
They could prove your father is a liar (if your father actually is) but then they'd need to stalk him and do things like that, which we all know isn't happening so they just gets another thing to comlain about (unreasonable/unfulfillable demands). But good point about NORAD.

Quote from: jtelroy on January 11, 2010, 10:54:26 AM

Also to Tom Bishop:

my father works for NORAD.  You are claiming that NORAD is a lie because they use satellite surveillance.

Prove to me that my father is a liar.

Let's not do that okay.
They could prove your father is a liar (if your father actually is) but then they'd need to stalk him and do things like that, which we all know isn't happening so they just gets another thing to comlain about (unreasonable/unfulfillable demands). But good point about NORAD.

True enough, so I'll just stick to the NORAD point.d

It doesn't make NORAD wrong just because they're duped liked the rest of us into thinking their info comes from satellites.

It doesn't make NORAD wrong just because they're duped liked the rest of us into thinking their info comes from satellites.

You are completely out of your mind.

There is photographic and video evidence of Satellites. Where are all the high altitude plane pictures??!?!?!

There are many images of high-altitude planes. Probably more than there are of satellites.

There are many images of high-altitude planes. Probably more than there are of satellites.

How many dummy planes would there have to be??? All of those pilots are in on the conspiracy. Keep expanding it. Keep expanding it.

Sorry I think I've derailed the debate.

Forget the NORAD point, go back to providing concrete evidence that the conspiracy exists.

There are many images of high-altitude planes. Probably more than there are of satellites.

Irrelevant.

Quote from: Lord Wilmore on January 12, 2010, 06:17:40 AM

There are many images of high-altitude planes. Probably more than there are of satellites.

How many dummy planes would there have to be??? All of those pilots are in on the conspiracy. Keep expanding it. Keep expanding it.

Good point. The cost of this conspiracy would be ridiculous so the chances of making a profit are poor. Think about it; bridge-builders, most of NASA, pilots etc.

Sorry I think I've derailed the debate.

Forget the NORAD point, go back to providing concrete evidence that the conspiracy exists.

No problem. It helped bring up a valid point, the cost.