If you're interested in rebutting the video, please provide a valid example.
1)You have drawn a conclusion based on your biased opinion alone.
2)You have made the statement that the sun is never inconsistently bright like that, which is irrelevant to the sun's appearance on a photograph-a converted digital photograph at that.
3)You have obviously not seen the sun in every instance, nor done the same procedure to every photograph ever taken of the sun, so you have no basis to make that claim.
4)You have no body of evidence showing known pictures of stage lights taken with that make and model of camera with the same settings and then converted to a digital image in the same manner.
5)You have no body of evidence showing known pictures of the sun taken with that make and model of camera with the same settings and then converted to a digital image in the same manner.
6)You have no body of evidence showing known pictures of stage lights taken with a different make and model of camera.
7)You have no body of evidence showing known pictures of the sun taken with a different model of camera.
8)You have no body of evidence showing the results after transition from film to digital of a current model film camera photograph of the sun.
9)You have no body of evidence showing the results after transition from film to digital of a current model film camera photograph of a stage light.
10)You proposed no hypothesis which could be validated or falsified by your series of tests.
11)A sample size of 1 is a poor basis for a conclusion.
See what happens when you just experiment and then try to apply what you see to what you wanted it to say in the first place?