Right back atchya'.
You really are refusing to read the evidence I gave you? That's cool.
No, you disagree. Leading scientists in the field agree, as my sources show.
Nope. Not one of your sources agrees that "the tools created by crows in these experiments as far more impressive than the various ways of hitting things that apes have devised."
The point is rather academic. It doesn't matter which is "more impressive". A twig bending crow does not a dinotopia make.
A floating nest does not a seafaring dinotopia create.
The ability to build rafts would, however, and we have shown this to be possible.
Once again, no you haven't.
Please provide us with evidence that there is more petrified wood from that period than from, say, 40,000 years ago.
Why would I need to do that?!
If you think it'll help your argument there's a wikipedia article. Check the dates on all the petrified wood sites.
There is no fossil evidence of the boats
Oh good. I'm glad we got that sorted.
The evidence I am talking about has actually been linked to in this thread, but as usual none of you can be bothered to look. Here is one example:
...snip...
The colonist Deinonychuses who reached the far east adapted in a number of ways. Adasauruses, probably due to massively increased tool usage and the removal of the necessity to be involved in violence as their civilisation progressed, developed much smaller foot-claws than their ancestors. A smaller claw would have been much more suitable for precision tasks like inscription, manipulation of cloth and fine materials and so on, and marks the transition from its role as a mechanism of hunting and combat to its role as an additional dexterous digit.
Hold. On. Are you telling me your "source" is James?
The "source" whose theory is under discussion?
Your evidence for James being right about colonial seafaring dinosaurs is that James posted some stuff about colonial seafaring dinosaurs?