James's theory on dinosaurs

  • 1799 Replies
  • 499825 Views
?

Ali

  • 237
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1440 on: May 04, 2011, 03:44:35 PM »
Given the lack of available shell casing evidence, I certainly am. Dinosaurs tiny forelimbs wouldn't have been able to cope with teh recoil anyway, that's why they stuck with single shot rifles.

?

Crustinator

  • 7783
  • +0/-0
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1441 on: May 04, 2011, 06:21:51 PM »
Given the lack of available shell casing evidence, I certainly am. Dinosaurs tiny forelimbs wouldn't have been able to cope with teh recoil anyway, that's why they stuck with single shot rifles.

Shell casing would disintegrate over the thousands of years since dinosaurs sailed the earth.

?

Horatio

  • Official Member
  • 3998
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1442 on: May 05, 2011, 12:23:48 AM »
Given the lack of available shell casing evidence, I certainly am. Dinosaurs tiny forelimbs wouldn't have been able to cope with teh recoil anyway, that's why they stuck with single shot rifles.

Shell casing would disintegrate over the thousands of years since dinosaurs sailed the earth.

Could a mod explain to me how this entire thread isn't a low content post?
How dare you have the audacity to demand my deposition. I've never even heard of you.

?

Ali

  • 237
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1443 on: May 05, 2011, 01:04:45 AM »
Given the lack of available shell casing evidence, I certainly am. Dinosaurs tiny forelimbs wouldn't have been able to cope with teh recoil anyway, that's why they stuck with single shot rifles.

Shell casing would disintegrate over the thousands of years since dinosaurs sailed the earth.

What if dinosaurs used titanium shell casings?

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1444 on: May 05, 2011, 08:15:02 AM »
How did the other dinosaurs get there?

They were the ones who built the boats - the dromaeosaurs.  Their prey animals such as Saurolophus were transported as yearlings in large agricultural shipping, along with seeds for crops, and tools and weapons.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Hazbollah

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 2436
  • +0/-0
  • Earth Shape Apathetic.
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1445 on: May 05, 2011, 08:50:26 AM »
Given the lack of available shell casing evidence, I certainly am. Dinosaurs tiny forelimbs wouldn't have been able to cope with teh recoil anyway, that's why they stuck with single shot rifles.
>implying semi-auto !=single shot.
Always check your tackle- Caerphilly school of Health. If I see an innuendo in my post, I'll be sure to whip it out.

?

Horatio

  • Official Member
  • 3998
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1446 on: May 05, 2011, 09:15:12 AM »
How did the other dinosaurs get there?

They were the ones who built the boats - the dromaeosaurs.  Their prey animals such as Saurolophus were transported as yearlings in large agricultural shipping, along with seeds for crops, and tools and weapons.

Quote
Trolling and low-content posting will not be tolerated and this forum will be moderated quite strictly.

James, you should know better, my brother.
How dare you have the audacity to demand my deposition. I've never even heard of you.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1447 on: May 05, 2011, 12:37:39 PM »
I am, as always, contributing amply to the discussion at hand (which, if you care to review the rest of this topic, is my own theory on dinosaurs). If you have nothing to contribute other than fallacious personal attacks which divert us from this noble discussion, you ought to leave this thread.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Crustinator

  • 7783
  • +0/-0
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1448 on: May 05, 2011, 03:26:24 PM »
Given the lack of available shell casing evidence, I certainly am. Dinosaurs tiny forelimbs wouldn't have been able to cope with teh recoil anyway, that's why they stuck with single shot rifles.

Shell casing would disintegrate over the thousands of years since dinosaurs sailed the earth.

What if dinosaurs used titanium shell casings?

Why bother?

?

Around And About

  • 2606
  • +0/-0
  • Circular Logic Falls Flat
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1449 on: May 05, 2011, 04:23:45 PM »
Given the lack of available shell casing evidence, I certainly am. Dinosaurs tiny forelimbs wouldn't have been able to cope with teh recoil anyway, that's why they stuck with single shot rifles.

Shell casing would disintegrate over the thousands of years since dinosaurs sailed the earth.

What if dinosaurs used titanium shell casings?

Why bother?

For an increase in penetrative ability against thick hides? Just a shot in the dark. ???
I'm not black nor a thug, I'm more like god who will bring 7 plagues of flat earth upon your ass.

*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1450 on: May 05, 2011, 04:56:06 PM »
Given the lack of available shell casing evidence, I certainly am. Dinosaurs tiny forelimbs wouldn't have been able to cope with teh recoil anyway, that's why they stuck with single shot rifles.

Shell casing would disintegrate over the thousands of years since dinosaurs sailed the earth.

What if dinosaurs used titanium shell casings?

Why bother?

For an increase in penetrative ability against thick hides? Just a shot in the dark. ???

The dinosaurs were eco-friendly and sustainable. You don't reign for millions of years without doing this.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1451 on: May 06, 2011, 06:29:33 PM »
I expect they became very good at recycling as they had an awful lot of time to think very carefully about it, unlike us humans who are always rushed off our feet with busy work, like imagining round Earths and building counterfeit space ships.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

Horatio

  • Official Member
  • 3998
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1452 on: May 06, 2011, 06:58:40 PM »
I expect they became very good at recycling as they had an awful lot of time to think very carefully about it, unlike us humans who are always rushed off our feet with busy work, like imagining round Earths and building counterfeit space ships.

How do you know that the dinosaurs didn't have their version of the conspiracy?
How dare you have the audacity to demand my deposition. I've never even heard of you.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1453 on: May 06, 2011, 07:02:23 PM »
They were probably too busy recycling and building ships to worry about such nonsense.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

john_hand

  • 250
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1454 on: May 07, 2011, 02:51:49 AM »
Given the lack of available shell casing evidence, I certainly am. Dinosaurs tiny forelimbs wouldn't have been able to cope with teh recoil anyway, that's why they stuck with single shot rifles.

Shell casing would disintegrate over the thousands of years since dinosaurs sailed the earth.

What if dinosaurs used titanium shell casings?

Why bother?

For an increase in penetrative ability against thick hides? Just a shot in the dark. ???

The dinosaurs were eco-friendly and sustainable. You don't reign for millions of years without doing this.

but dinosaurs where around 9000 years ago according to this site?

?

john_hand

  • 250
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1455 on: May 07, 2011, 02:54:09 AM »
They were probably too busy recycling and building ships to worry about such nonsense.

so the conspiracy is nonsense? the FE conspiracy that this site is built upon, is nonsense? (according to someone who thinks dinosaurs were a sea faring society with a taste for their pets and agriculture)

?

Horatio

  • Official Member
  • 3998
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1456 on: May 07, 2011, 05:44:40 AM »
I've had enough of this nonsense. I am going to compose a letter (perhaps include a petition) to Daniel asking that James have his Flat Earth Believer status revoked, since I am fairly certain Daniel isn't intending for the Flat Earth Society to become like the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

James may be entertaining, but there should be a limit to absurdity among the Flat Earth Believers.
How dare you have the audacity to demand my deposition. I've never even heard of you.

?

Hazbollah

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 2436
  • +0/-0
  • Earth Shape Apathetic.
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1457 on: May 07, 2011, 05:45:01 AM »
Given the lack of available shell casing evidence, I certainly am. Dinosaurs tiny forelimbs wouldn't have been able to cope with teh recoil anyway, that's why they stuck with single shot rifles.

Shell casing would disintegrate over the thousands of years since dinosaurs sailed the earth.

What if dinosaurs used titanium shell casings?

Why bother?

For an increase in penetrative ability against thick hides? Just a shot in the dark. ???

The dinosaurs were eco-friendly and sustainable. You don't reign for millions of years without doing this.

but dinosaurs where around 9000 years ago according to this site?
Dinosaurs are around today.
Always check your tackle- Caerphilly school of Health. If I see an innuendo in my post, I'll be sure to whip it out.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1458 on: May 07, 2011, 06:38:51 AM »
I've had enough of this nonsense. I am going to compose a letter (perhaps include a petition) to Daniel asking that James have his Flat Earth Believer status revoked, since I am fairly certain Daniel isn't intending for the Flat Earth Society to become like the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

James may be entertaining, but there should be a limit to absurdity among the Flat Earth Believers.

You leave me no choice but to compose a counter-letter, undemanding everything which you are planning to demand.  It is a shame that you have to distract from the important issues and scientific debate of this thread with your childish vendetta against my character, and that I will have to waste my valuable time composing a counter-letter.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

sillyrob

  • Official Member
  • 3771
  • +0/-0
  • Punk rawk.
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1459 on: May 07, 2011, 10:20:32 PM »
I've had enough of this nonsense. I am going to compose a letter (perhaps include a petition) to Daniel asking that James have his Flat Earth Believer status revoked, since I am fairly certain Daniel isn't intending for the Flat Earth Society to become like the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

James may be entertaining, but there should be a limit to absurdity among the Flat Earth Believers.

You leave me no choice but to compose a counter-letter, undemanding everything which you are planning to demand.  It is a shame that you have to distract from the important issues and scientific debate of this thread with your childish vendetta against my character, and that I will have to waste my valuable time composing a counter-letter.
I'm going to write a counter-counter-letter stating that Horatio, as much of a whiny dork as he is, is in fact right and you do nothing but derail and spread nonsense to the people on this website.

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1460 on: May 08, 2011, 03:24:59 AM »
No alteration of my position or rank, were such an outcome even likely in the slightest, could possibly silence the voice of my truth.  Not only would I continue to expound the true science with my characteristic vigour and eloquence, but my manifold zetetic colleagues will inevitably continue to defend the fine theorems which I have advanced, in every board of this website which admits such subject matters, to include the Flat Earth Believer's board on which I have posted with integrity and depth for some five calendar years, never erring in my dedication to the truth.  Were I completely absent from the field of debate, theorems of the same quality and quantity would be espoused by my friends and fellow scientists, as has been demonstrated historically during times wherein I have wandered the Earth and as such omitted to post.

Of these facts, my friend Daniel and the rest of the administration are plainly aware, and they, like I, have so often been subjected to the unjust complaint of ephemeral globularist web-debators as to be quite unlikely to hear such demands as the dismissal of a fellow zetetic scientist.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

john_hand

  • 250
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1461 on: May 08, 2011, 04:18:43 AM »
your over the top, self-indulgent & overly verbose rants, prolific use of 'big words' and rhetoric is mind numbingly boring, not to mention utterly insane, especially the cartoon dinosaurs in boats that you draw

inb4 FE’ers don’t get the irony

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1462 on: May 08, 2011, 04:32:18 AM »
My verisimilitude is not countermanded by spurious aspersions.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

john_hand

  • 250
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1463 on: May 08, 2011, 04:42:06 AM »
no, you're a patronising eejit who thinks he's cleverer than everyone else, but the truth is, you're typical of a certain type of internet personality, in that you hide your total lack of credability behind a sound grasp and excellent delivery off written word

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1464 on: May 08, 2011, 05:55:08 AM »
I must warn you to abstain from personal vitriol in your posts, or you shall leave me no choice but to banish you from these flat Earth society forums.
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

john_hand

  • 250
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1465 on: May 08, 2011, 06:21:09 AM »
another familiar tactic in avoiding unanswerable questions, the ban hammer, I've seen this in many instances before this, I remind you that I have lurked here for longer than you think, I know how you work, predictability is your Achilles..

*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1466 on: May 08, 2011, 06:34:13 AM »
James is respected for his brilliance and for how he can apply that brilliance to making us all more knowledgeable. 

Take the time to read and learn and you will be all the wiser for time better spent. Make sure that thinking is part of your regimen and you will understand.

?

john_hand

  • 250
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1467 on: May 08, 2011, 06:44:40 AM »
I am paid an awful lot to think, it is a natural poise for my mind, but James is drawing cartoons of dinosaurs sailing boats and expects to be taken seriously. his reference points are that of a 200 year old smack head with a thin grasp of reality, and physics, and whilst he is undoubtedly an intelligent individual, I am yet to see him express this brilliance you speak off, especially in the area of evidence to the FET

*

Saddam Hussein

  • Official Member
  • 35188
  • +1/-0
  • Former President of Iraq
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1468 on: May 08, 2011, 09:12:56 AM »
James is drawing cartoons of dinosaurs sailing boats and expects to be taken seriously.

I see no problem.

*

Ichimaru Gin :]

  • Undefeated FEer
  • Planar Moderator
  • 8880
  • +3/-3
  • Semper vigilans
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #1469 on: May 08, 2011, 09:17:50 AM »
I know how you work, predictability is your Achilles..
What hubris to think you know what James will do next.
I saw a slight haze in the hotel bathroom this morning after I took a shower, have I discovered a new planet?