James's theory on dinosaurs

Why wasn't Barney removed Ichi?

Edit: Or any other picture one that same page?

Why wasn't Barney removed Ichi?

Edit: Or any other picture one that same page?

Not sure, but it's good to know that pictures of mating dinosaurs and naked sandy women are allowed!

Quote from: sillyrob on March 23, 2011, 04:14:52 PM

Why wasn't Barney removed Ichi?

Edit: Or any other picture one that same page?

Not sure, but it's good to know that pictures of mating dinosaurs and naked sandy women are allowed!

I know, if I post pictures of either of those and I get banned, I shall reference this thread.

I know, if I post pictures of either of those and I get banned, I shall reference this thread.

It will do you no good. The Conspiracy is in control now.

Quote from: Saddam Hussein on March 22, 2011, 06:04:17 PM

Well suggested, Brother Beorn.  Alternatively, a method of avoiding attention from amorous dinosaurs would be to work undercover in teams, thereby signaling that you already have a mate.  Observe how the professionals operate:

Brother Saddam, I would worry for our mutual Brother if he were to try to disguise himself as you have suggested. That owuld be akin to dressing as a 1970s pimp in an attempt to go undercover in a New York gang. Most street gangs these days were a lot less ermine and our mutual Brothers life would surely be in jeopardy.

I'm not necessarily suggesting that he dress up as Barney.  I'm only saying that working as a part of a team is likely to reduce the risk of rape.

Saddam is Barney.  He is.

Why wasn't Barney removed Ichi?

Edit: Or any other picture one that same page?

They're relevant.

Quote from: sillyrob on March 23, 2011, 04:14:52 PM

Why wasn't Barney removed Ichi?

Edit: Or any other picture one that same page?

They're relevant.

Barney is not relevant.

Quote from: Beorn on March 23, 2011, 11:04:56 PM

Quote from: sillyrob on March 23, 2011, 04:14:52 PM

Why wasn't Barney removed Ichi?

Edit: Or any other picture one that same page?

They're relevant.

Barney is not relevant.

It is very relevant.  We are talking about dinosaur disguises.

I have a confession. I do not know what shall be held against me, or what consequences I may gain, but I have to say it.

I may or may not be a dinosaur.

I'm only saying that working as a part of a team is likely to reduce the risk of rape.

You should be doing this already.

I have a confession. I do not know what shall be held against me, or what consequences I may gain, but I have to say it.

I may or may not be a dinosaur.

Don't worry about it, man.  None of us are racist.  Besides, there are good dinosaurs and bad dinosaurs, just like people.

Quote from: Saddam Hussein on March 23, 2011, 05:13:15 PM

I'm only saying that working as a part of a team is likely to reduce the risk of rape.

You should be doing this already.

I agree, but apparently Brother James isn't.  That's a problem.

Now I know why governments can commit huge atrocities. It's kinda like this thread; the mods are being hilariously out of order and it's kinda funny to watch.

I hope NATO will step in if the mods turn on us.

Crusty, I would have thought that you know that NATO is in on the conspiracy. We have enough trouble without NATO on here.

This is true. NATO (NASA) only ever act in their own best interests. However is would not surprise me if things on this forum were not as black and white as they seem. Certainly many senior accounts have been hacked by Conspiracy Agents. To this end, both NASAs interests and our own would briefly align to remove the scourge.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/04/110412201724.htm

"Evolution in birds of the olfactory bulb, the part of the brain where smell information is processed, passing from a dinosaur (Bambiraptor) through early birds (Lithornis, Presbyornis) to a modern-day bird (pigeon). (Credit: Courtesy of WitmerLab at Ohio University)"

Yeah, and guess what? Bambiraptors are therapods. So just for fun I'll ask this again:

Anyway, my point is...how did non-therapod dinosaurs get on all of the continents?

They were taken across as livestock.

Wow. Best answer I've read so far in this wonderful forum. Go on, enlighten me.....by who?

They were taken across as livestock.

what, like pets? interesting theory, but mine is better; dinosaurs evolved into even more special creatures, and split atoms, thus blowing the shit out of some point in South America, but covered it all up with a simulated meteor strike in case they got in trouble with the US and the whole war on terror malarkey. challenge you to prove me wrong, and if you can't, I therefore am proved correct.

Just some friendly advice (I'm not a moderator!), you can get banned for low-content posts like that in the "upper fora", I suggest reading the rules if you want to avoid this.

To answer your question, presumably by therapods, the super-intelligent dinosaurs which you know today as birds.

Just some friendly advice (I'm not a moderator!), you can get banned for low-content posts like that in the "upper fora", I suggest reading the rules if you want to avoid this.

To answer your question, presumably by therapods, the super-intelligent dinosaurs which you know today as birds.

This entire thread is low-content.

Keep posts on-topic and high-content in here. In Flat Earth Debate discussions are moderated far moree strictly than elsewhere. Please read both the Forum Rules and the board-specific rules.

Just some friendly advice (I'm not a moderator!), you can get banned for low-content posts like that in the "upper fora", I suggest reading the rules if you want to avoid this.

To answer your question, presumably by therapods, the super-intelligent dinosaurs which you know today as birds.

Birds are super intelligent? Since when? Ever met a supposedly intelligent owl? Thickest creatures I work with in my professional capacity. A newt has more brains. Raptors? The average hamster has a higher problem solving capability. The crow family or parrots? If party tricks are your thing, be my guest and be impressed by them, but rats show them the way to the door and kick their low IQ butts as they leave. I'll happily be proven wrong, but the direct decendent of everyone's favourite Jurassic Park extra, the velociraptor (BTW, the film was a lie, their is no evidence to suggest they were intelligent), is the chicken. Not exactly in line with this thread's super intelligent dinosaurs, really, is it? But carry on, I'm having a right laugh here.

The crow family or parrots?

Many studies have been done showing that corvid dinosaurs can use and create tools to solve problems. I have posted links to several of them in this thread. You should give it a read.

In all seriousness, plenty of birds have been shown to be extremely intelligent.  For example, I think crows have been observed dropping shells or things they wanted to break onto roads, then waiting until a car comes along and smashes it.

Hardly intelligent and certainly a very large leap of faith away from using tools and floating across oceans. The vast majority of the reference to bird intelligence come from laboratory situations where persistent training and reward has been used to alter natural behaviour. THere are VERY few incidences of observed wild behaviour where any form of tool use has been observed. And I would hardly call putting shells on a road a sign of intelligence. It's a trial and error, learned repetitive behaviour. If this is evidence of dinosaurs building ships, then the rats will be constructing Death Stars soon...

In all seriousness, plenty of birds have been shown to be extremely intelligent.  For example, I think crows have been observed dropping shells or things they wanted to break onto roads, then waiting until a car comes along and smashes it.

Crows began demonstrating the ability to construct tools using wires during experiments to see if they could do a task with a premade tool. The researchers forgot to provide a hook for the birds, so the birds bent a wire into a hook and used it instead. This ability is not shared by other birds of close relation meaning it is a trait that they most likely evolved long after branching off from most prehistoric dinosaur species. There is no reason to believe their ancient ancestors shared the ability, but crows certainly are advanced and have a local languages.

Wow. Best answer I've read so far in this wonderful forum. Go on, enlighten me.....by who?

By other dinosaurs.

How did the other dinosaurs get there?