James's theory on dinosaurs

  • 1799 Replies
  • 499827 Views
?

zork

  • 3338
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #840 on: September 14, 2010, 10:26:06 AM »
Very true Brother Engrish. We also need to recognise that jet powered Ichthyosaurs should be considered more advanced than swimming Ichthyosaurs due to the advanced nature of their propulsion, which may or may not have been diesel based.
I would say that the sea creatures are currently more advanced because they use jet propulsion systems for moving. Birds just flap their wings.
Rowbotham had bad eyesight
-
http://thulescientific.com/Lynch%20Curvature%202008.pdf - Visually discerning the curvature of the Earth
http://thulescientific.com/TurbulentShipWakes_Lynch_AO_2005.pdf - Turbulent ship wakes:further evidence that the Earth is round.

*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #841 on: September 14, 2010, 10:56:13 AM »
Very true Brother Engrish. We also need to recognise that jet powered Ichthyosaurs should be considered more advanced than swimming Ichthyosaurs due to the advanced nature of their propulsion, which may or may not have been diesel based.
I would say that the sea creatures are currently more advanced because they use jet propulsion systems for moving. Birds just flap their wings.
Let's not fail to give credit to the mammals, bats, whales, dolphins, etc. that use sophisticated echo-location for navigation! Obviously by James's reasoning whales must have had an advanced civilization too!
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45089
  • +87/-120
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #842 on: September 14, 2010, 12:31:23 PM »
I would also like to point out that a bird's nest is very similar to a boat. If a dinosaur can build a boat-like nest, couldn't a dinosaur build a nest-like boat? 

Boat-like nests are not the same as the sea faring naval armadas that you have proposed in this thread.

An armada is merely a large fleet. Is it unlikely that Dinosaurs sailed together in large groups much like humans did for a large part of our history?

How large of groups that dinosaurs may or may not have sailed in is irrelevant when no one has demonstrated that dinosaurs were capable of building sea worthy vessels.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Ichimaru Gin :]

  • Undefeated FEer
  • Planar Moderator
  • 8880
  • +3/-3
  • Semper vigilans
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #843 on: September 14, 2010, 01:22:09 PM »
But you can watch them do so today!
I saw a slight haze in the hotel bathroom this morning after I took a shower, have I discovered a new planet?

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45089
  • +87/-120
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #844 on: September 14, 2010, 01:23:03 PM »
But you can watch them do so today!

Watch who do what today?  ???
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #845 on: September 14, 2010, 01:35:21 PM »
Can you watch dinosaurs build ocean-capable boats today?

I'd just like to point out to everyone that nobody has provided any evidence that dinosaurs were an advanced civilization, or that they were capable of building ocean-crossing boats.
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

?

Crustinator

  • 7783
  • +0/-0
  • Bamhammer horror!
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #846 on: September 14, 2010, 02:14:51 PM »
Very true Brother Engrish. We also need to recognise that jet powered Ichthyosaurs should be considered more advanced than swimming Ichthyosaurs due to the advanced nature of their propulsion, which may or may not have been diesel based.
I would say that the sea creatures are currently more advanced because they use jet propulsion systems for moving. Birds just flap their wings.
Let's not fail to give credit to the mammals, bats, whales, dolphins, etc. that use sophisticated echo-location for navigation! Obviously by James's reasoning whales must have had an advanced civilization too!

Actually it's widely accepted by scientists that whales may or may not have had access to flame throwers at least up until the last ice age. It is quite likely that if they did indeed have access to suh technology then they would have used them for herding plankton.

*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #847 on: September 14, 2010, 02:19:46 PM »
Very true Brother Engrish. We also need to recognise that jet powered Ichthyosaurs should be considered more advanced than swimming Ichthyosaurs due to the advanced nature of their propulsion, which may or may not have been diesel based.
I would say that the sea creatures are currently more advanced because they use jet propulsion systems for moving. Birds just flap their wings.
Let's not fail to give credit to the mammals, bats, whales, dolphins, etc. that use sophisticated echo-location for navigation! Obviously by James's reasoning whales must have had an advanced civilization too!

Actually it's widely accepted by scientists that whales may or may not have had access to flame throwers at least up until the last ice age. It is quite likely that if they did indeed have access to suh technology then they would have used them for herding plankton.
I am so enlightened. Thanks brother!

What I love right now is how loosely the FEers use the term "civilization". Please show me any evidence of a non-human civilization. <cue Jeopardy! theme music>
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #848 on: September 14, 2010, 03:33:59 PM »
Birds don't have a civilization capable of building ocean-crossing boats, therefore Dinosaurs didn't have them either.


Please, that conclusion in now way follows from the preceding statement. After all, pre-historic humans did not have a civilisation capable of building ocean-crossing boats, but it does not follow that modern humans do not have one.

Just like how humans can tape their figure together and build boats, but it does not follow that dinosaurs could do the same. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #849 on: September 14, 2010, 04:42:57 PM »
Very true Brother Engrish. We also need to recognise that jet powered Ichthyosaurs should be considered more advanced than swimming Ichthyosaurs due to the advanced nature of their propulsion, which may or may not have been diesel based.
I would say that the sea creatures are currently more advanced because they use jet propulsion systems for moving. Birds just flap their wings.
Let's not fail to give credit to the mammals, bats, whales, dolphins, etc. that use sophisticated echo-location for navigation! Obviously by James's reasoning whales must have had an advanced civilization too!

Actually it's widely accepted by scientists that whales may or may not have had access to flame throwers at least up until the last ice age. It is quite likely that if they did indeed have access to suh technology then they would have used them for herding plankton.
I am so enlightened. Thanks brother!

What I love right now is how loosely the FEers use the term "civilization". Please show me any evidence of a non-human civilization. <cue Jeopardy! theme music>
ITT prehistoric ants.  You do know there is evidence that some members of their civilization used the mummification process long before the Egyptians?

*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #850 on: September 14, 2010, 05:07:17 PM »

What I love right now is how loosely the FEers use the term "civilization". Please show me any evidence of a non-human civilization. <cue Jeopardy! theme music>
ITT prehistoric ants.  You do know there is evidence that some members of their civilization used the mummification process long before the Egyptians?
Sorry, you did not provide any evidence. Don Pardo, please tell our contestant about their lovely parting gifts. <cue Weird Al.>
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #851 on: September 15, 2010, 10:29:56 AM »
Here is up-to-date photographic evidence of a dinosaur travelling on a wooden boat which it has built:

"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #852 on: September 15, 2010, 10:43:18 AM »

Another victory for FE!!!!

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #853 on: September 15, 2010, 10:47:27 AM »
That is not traveling on the ocean.

I'd just like to point out to everyone that nobody has provided any evidence that dinosaurs were an advanced civilization, or that they were capable of building ocean-crossing boats.
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #854 on: September 15, 2010, 11:19:34 AM »
Here is up-to-date photographic evidence of a dinosaur travelling on a wooden boat which it has built:


Please demonstrate that it built that boat as you claim.
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #855 on: September 15, 2010, 11:24:01 AM »
What kind of demonstration could possibly be offered? What form would that sort of evidence even take?

Your demands are completely unreasonable; any non-fundamentalist would quite rightly infer that the boat was built by the dinosaur. It is testament to your globularist fanaticism that you are unwilling to accept the truth when it is staring you right in the face (from aboard its boat).
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #856 on: September 15, 2010, 11:30:32 AM »
What kind of demonstration could possibly be offered? What form would that sort of evidence even take?

Your demands are completely unreasonable; any non-fundamentalist would quite rightly infer that the boat was built by the dinosaur. It is testament to your globularist fanaticism that you are unwilling to accept the truth when it is staring you right in the face (from aboard its boat).
Please stop making claims then that you can't support. The existance of a boat does not mean that the current occupant it. I sit in a wonderful nome for example that I did not build. I suppose if I posted a photo of a birdhouse you'd agree that occupants built it. For shame, especially on the name calling. You're above that, and, as a mod, you should respect the rules. I am not a globular fanatic, and I insist you apologize.
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #857 on: September 15, 2010, 11:35:58 AM »
The existance of a boat does not mean that the current occupant it. I sit in a wonderful nome

What is an existance, nome, and what is the current occupant doing to "it"?

I see your blatant globularism has affected your brain so strongly that you are now making up words in order to try and argue for RE.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2010, 11:38:02 AM by EnglshGentleman »

*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #858 on: September 15, 2010, 11:42:05 AM »
I shall not apologize, because I am not calling you names, you are a globular fundamentalist, it is not a slur, it is a sincere observation about your beliefs.

Let's continue our analysis of the photograph, with respect to the points you have made. I appreciate that you did not build your own nome, however, one may look at your nome (presumably) and reasonably infer "this was built by a human". It bears, I assume, the hallmarks of human construction - the use of bricks, nails, and whatever else.

Since the boat in the picture is built in the style of other dinosaur buildings and structures which we can observe, it is perfectly reasonable to assume that was built, if not by the dinosaur which is occupying it, at least by a dinosaur. For comparison, here is a dinosaur tree-house built in very similar style:

"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901

?

General Disarray

  • Official Member
  • 5032
  • +0/-0
  • Magic specialist
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #859 on: September 15, 2010, 01:00:28 PM »
I'd just like to point out to everyone that nobody has provided any evidence that dinosaurs were an advanced civilization, or that they were capable of building ocean-crossing boats.
You don't want to make an enemy of me. I'm very powerful.

*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #860 on: September 15, 2010, 01:05:50 PM »
I shall not apologize, because I am not calling you names, you are a globular fundamentalist, it is not a slur, it is a sincere observation about your beliefs.
You called be a fanatic, sir. Do be honest. I am not a fanatic. You've insulted me and, especially as a mod, you should apologize. I am offended. If name calling in the upper forums continues, you damage that very goal of estiblishing a open climate of serious debate. Have you no shame, sir? None at all?
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #861 on: September 15, 2010, 01:09:53 PM »
Let's continue our analysis of the photograph, with respect to the points you have made. I appreciate that you did not build your own nome, however, one may look at your nome (presumably) and reasonably infer "this was built by a human". It bears, I assume, the hallmarks of human construction - the use of bricks, nails, and whatever else.

Since the boat in the picture is built in the style of other dinosaur buildings and structures which we can observe, it is perfectly reasonable to assume that was built, if not by the dinosaur which is occupying it, at least by a dinosaur. For comparison, here is a dinosaur tree-house built in very similar style:


I had thought you were dogplatter. Thanks for the confirmation.

When you're done making outlandish assumptions, do post your evidence. Please show us a avian dinosaur building a sea-faring boat. If you're sure such events happen, no doubt and without dreaming, you should be able to provide evidence. Of course, you might want to tell us the reason the bird would need a boat when you get a chance, and show us the bird using the boat in that manner.
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

?

zork

  • 3338
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #862 on: September 15, 2010, 01:22:18 PM »
Here is up-to-date photographic evidence of a dinosaur travelling on a wooden boat which it has built:
It's a bird, not dinosaur. And I just see that it sits on the nest which is on the water. No marks of traveling. It may well be built on the rock which is under the nest.
Rowbotham had bad eyesight
-
http://thulescientific.com/Lynch%20Curvature%202008.pdf - Visually discerning the curvature of the Earth
http://thulescientific.com/TurbulentShipWakes_Lynch_AO_2005.pdf - Turbulent ship wakes:further evidence that the Earth is round.

*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #863 on: September 15, 2010, 03:35:51 PM »
Let's continue our analysis of the photograph, with respect to the points you have made. I appreciate that you did not build your own nome, however, one may look at your nome (presumably) and reasonably infer "this was built by a human". It bears, I assume, the hallmarks of human construction - the use of bricks, nails, and whatever else.

Since the boat in the picture is built in the style of other dinosaur buildings and structures which we can observe, it is perfectly reasonable to assume that was built, if not by the dinosaur which is occupying it, at least by a dinosaur. For comparison, here is a dinosaur tree-house built in very similar style:


I had thought you were dogplatter. Thanks for the confirmation.

When you're done making outlandish assumptions, do post your evidence. Please show us a avian dinosaur building a sea-faring boat. If you're sure such events happen, no doubt and without dreaming, you should be able to provide evidence. Of course, you might want to tell us the reason the bird would need a boat when you get a chance, and show us the bird using the boat in that manner.

Why would modern dinosaurs need to build boats when they can fly?  ???

They would have no motivation to, therefore they wouldn't.

*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #864 on: September 15, 2010, 03:44:09 PM »
Why would modern dinosaurs need to build boats when they can fly?  ???

They would have no motivation to, therefore they wouldn't.
So you agree that James's' claim is false. Thanks for the support.

By the way, I do find it odd that fish still build luxury yachts when they already have airliners.
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #865 on: September 15, 2010, 03:51:39 PM »
Here is up-to-date photographic evidence of a dinosaur travelling on a wooden boat which it has built:



Since when was a nest a boat? 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #866 on: September 15, 2010, 04:01:57 PM »

*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #867 on: September 15, 2010, 04:03:37 PM »
Birds are considered dinosaurs.

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/avians.html
Just like humans are considered fish. So do you have a point?
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

*

gotham

  • 3624
  • +2/-6
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #868 on: September 15, 2010, 04:06:15 PM »
Birds are considered dinosaurs.

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/avians.html
Just like humans are considered fish. So do you have a point?
Yes, that birds are dinosaurs.

*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: James's theory on dinosaurs
« Reply #869 on: September 15, 2010, 04:06:34 PM »
Birds are considered dinosaurs.

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/avians.html
Just like humans are considered fish. So do you have a point?

Evidence? Please point me to a site where humans are considered a type of fish.