James's theory on dinosaurs

The reason is that much of dinosaurs "intelligence" was oppressed when the mammals took power. All records showing their witty repartee have been destroyed.

Actually, I saw something on the History channel that said that nearly all traces of human existence will disappear 50 million years after humans do.

But will our wit survive us, as it failed to do with the ancient dinosaurs?

But will our wit survive us, as it failed to do with the ancient dinosaurs?

With all due respect James, the dinosaurs wit did not fail to survive. Despite humans efforts to eradicate evidence we still have many works from the Greater Pangean Library, including all 6 volumes of Diplodocus Aurelius' "Nature and The Natural", which I find hilarious in places, but you really have to understand the context it was written in and who he was writing for.

Do not mock me, I am one of the leading scientists of our time. My theories are of the most profound importance!

Do not mock me, I am one of the leading scientists of our time. My theories are of the most profound importance!

James. Science can only make progress by challenging the theories that have existed before. This is what the dinosaurs failed to recognise when they built Azilaar.

James, I have a great deal of respect for your theories and knowledge.

Interesting where the impetus for research can spring from.  Recently, I was searching locally for an area to work on replicating some experiments in ENAG and look who was looking out in the direction where the solution may be? 




The canal goes for a distance of about 20 miles in that direction so it was lucky I was walking by right then.   

James, I have a great deal of respect for your theories and knowledge.

Interesting where the impetus for research can spring from.  Recently, I was searching locally for an area to work on replicating some experiments in ENAG and look who was looking out in the direction where the solution may be? 




The canal goes for a distance of about 20 miles in that direction so it was lucky I was walking by right then.   

  That is a very nice picture, I can see the rajasaurus in the sky very clearly.

That picture is obviously faked.

That picture is obviously faked.

Justify this statement.

By the standards of FET, if pictures can be faked, then they are faked. No similar claim by FE'ers has been justified further, so I see no need to justify this further.

It clearly is a doctored image, but it's very pretty all the same.

Point taken on the claim that photos can be doctored.  In this case between me, myself and I, I know that it is all original and I must accept the compliment about doctoring skills that I lack.

Dinosaurs are naturally contemplative and stoic; it does not surprise me in the slightest to see a large dinosaur gazing wistfully out at the waters on which its ancestors made their great voyages. It warms my heart to see such an image, thank you Gotham for your lovely picture.

Perhaps dinosaurs have collective consciousness. Yes. I believe that is the case.

When I see a flock of dinosaurs diving and swerving together in large number in the sky, I am often struck by the extent to which they seem to move with single-minded coordination and purpose, but so too do men when they march about or dance. I conceive that the minds of dinosaurs are linked to the same extent as those of men, that as Jung mentioned they have a cultural collective consciousness, that they have minds of their own but that on occassion these minds may link by way of their mental pathways or their cultural convergences.

When I see a flock of dinosaurs diving and swerving together in large number in the sky, I am often struck by the extent to which they seem to move with single-minded coordination and purpose, but so too do men when they march about or dance. I conceive that the minds of dinosaurs are linked to the same extent as those of men, that as Jung mentioned they have a cultural collective consciousness, that they have minds of their own but that on occassion these minds may link by way of their mental pathways or their cultural convergences.

Parsec already explained your mindlink with ichimaru, and it involved a penis and a butt. I haven't seen that with the dinosaurs, so if their minds link it must be in a different way.

Dinosaurs are naturally contemplative and stoic; it does not surprise me in the slightest to see a large dinosaur gazing wistfully out at the waters on which its ancestors made their great voyages. It warms my heart to see such an image, thank you Gotham for your lovely picture.

Unfortunately it is not natural for dinosaurs to stand on fences or rails. I must therefore conclude that the picture is fake.

Quote from: James on March 01, 2011, 07:18:05 PM

Dinosaurs are naturally contemplative and stoic; it does not surprise me in the slightest to see a large dinosaur gazing wistfully out at the waters on which its ancestors made their great voyages. It warms my heart to see such an image, thank you Gotham for your lovely picture.

Unfortunately it is not natural for dinosaurs to stand on fences or rails. I must therefore conclude that the picture is fake.

Modern dinosaurs are highly adaptable to their environment.

Quote from: James on March 01, 2011, 07:28:16 PM

When I see a flock of dinosaurs diving and swerving together in large number in the sky, I am often struck by the extent to which they seem to move with single-minded coordination and purpose, but so too do men when they march about or dance. I conceive that the minds of dinosaurs are linked to the same extent as those of men, that as Jung mentioned they have a cultural collective consciousness, that they have minds of their own but that on occassion these minds may link by way of their mental pathways or their cultural convergences.

Parsec already explained your mindlink with ichimaru, and it involved a penis and a butt. I haven't seen that with the dinosaurs, so if their minds link it must be in a different way.

Please don't make low content posts in the upper fora. If you want to explore our close intellectual admiration for each other, then please start a thread in the Lounge or RM.

Perhaps dinosaurs have collective consciousness. Yes. I believe that is the case.

Thats quite a jump to make within the span of one post.  Why do you think this is the case?

Perhaps dinosaurs have collective consciousness. Yes. I believe that is the case.

....

So you now propose something then instantly believe it? Thank you for showing your complete lack of zetetic method in one post.

Quote from: Ichimaru Gin :] on March 01, 2011, 07:23:00 PM

Perhaps dinosaurs have collective consciousness. Yes. I believe that is the case.

....

So you now propose something then instantly believe it? Thank you for showing your complete lack of zetetic method in one post.

I rather think of it as a good demonstration of how the "zetetic method" is practiced on this site.

Raist is posting back up in the upper foras?

I propose he probably should stick to the lower fora. Yes. Now I instantly believe that is the case as well. 

I propose he probably should stick to the lower fora. Yes. Now I instantly believe that is the case as well.  

Ichi, your posting in the upper fora has slowly become a disgrace to FE theory. I say this in the most serious manner. Your suggestion of ridiculous ideas without any real evidence harms FE theory in a way that I can no longer tolerate. I will not have a debate with you because I know your methods and know that your insincerity makes you as hard headed as CR90, but I will put forth that you need to reconsider what you are doing. Either return to serious debate or leave the upper fora to people that have something to contribute.

I have abandoned the upper fora simply because the debate has moved from factual to conjecture, and ridiculous conjecture is not my strong suit. I know you are a bit new here, but at a time I was a firm contributor to the upper fora.

As a moderator I would suggest you stop ridiculing me and address my point directly. I suggest you follow your own advice and stick to the lower fora. Being a moderator does not give you the right to spam the upper fora under the guise of sincerity.

Edit: As I recall when you joined this site you mostly stuck to the lower forum, aside from a few debates where you were strictly asking questions you stayed out of the upper fora. The only contribution you have made sense then is to make baseless untestable claims. Please stick to the lower fora with your spam.

Quote from: Ichimaru Gin :] on March 01, 2011, 07:23:00 PM

Perhaps dinosaurs have collective consciousness. Yes. I believe that is the case.

Thats quite a jump to make within the span of one post.  Why do you think this is the case?

We know for a fact that dinosaurs worked together in building of boats and castles. How could they do so? It is pretty clear that they employed some form of tele-cerebral-communication (TCC) which is beyond our understanding.

When I see a flock of dinosaurs diving and swerving together in large number in the sky, I am often struck by the extent to which they seem to move with single-minded coordination and purpose, but so too do men when they march about or dance. I conceive that the minds of dinosaurs are linked to the same extent as those of men, that as Jung mentioned they have a cultural collective consciousness, that they have minds of their own but that on occassion these minds may link by way of their mental pathways or their cultural convergences.

I agree James. Even more curious is the social structures and concepts they uphold. Though there may be no physical distinction of territory on a tree, they are still able to recognize ownership of a region up to the inch. This is true across species, new members of the area, and newborn avian dinosaurs. Curious since they are surely not present at 'home' all the time.

Being a moderator does not give you the right to spam the upper fora under the guise of sincerity.

You are right.

Being a member of the Zetetic Council allows him to do that.

Quote from: James on March 01, 2011, 07:28:16 PM

When I see a flock of dinosaurs diving and swerving together in large number in the sky, I am often struck by the extent to which they seem to move with single-minded coordination and purpose, but so too do men when they march about or dance. I conceive that the minds of dinosaurs are linked to the same extent as those of men, that as Jung mentioned they have a cultural collective consciousness, that they have minds of their own but that on occassion these minds may link by way of their mental pathways or their cultural convergences.

I agree James. Even more curious is the social structures and concepts they uphold. Though there may be no physical distinction of territory on a tree, they are still able to recognize ownership of a region up to the inch. This is true across species, new members of the area, and newborn avian dinosaurs. Curious since they are surely not present at 'home' all the time.

Using a computer model with a few simple rules allows us to model perfectly avian flocking behavior.

Remember kids, just because you are too stupid to realize how something works, doesn't mean it is done by mind linking.