James's theory on dinosaurs

Recently, I was walking past a dinosaur and just for fun addressed it as "chopper" even though that is not its real name.  The dinosaur did a double take and then responded with exuberant laughter exhibiting a well developed sense of humor.

This led me to think that if dinosaurs have a sense of humor then they could also have in them other traits that represent the building blocks of an even more advanced civilization than we now give them credit for.  It has already been discussed that they do have a history of building, travel and social abilities.

What if they had developed to a level where their community interests and capacity included what we now know as theater?      

Could they not have constructed amphitheaters for purposes of staging dramatic performances or perhaps used natural amphitheaters that exist even to this day to facilitate such dramatic performances?  

It would not be such a stretch to consider this potential if they were really that socially advanced.

What if the sky was orange?

I cannot decide which group is more damaging to FET: its genuine adherents or false ones.

I cannot decide which group is more damaging to FET: its genuine adherents or false ones.

It is not all that far fetched considering what has already been established regarding dinosaurs.  You may want to spend a little more time reviewing this thread.   

Quote from: Around And About on February 17, 2011, 06:06:17 PM

I cannot decide which group is more damaging to FET: its genuine adherents or false ones.

It is not all that far fetched considering what has already been established regarding dinosaurs.  You may want to spend a little more time reviewing this thread.   

Birds are generally referred to as "modern dinosaurs" in order to avoid confusion with the more familiar prehistoric dinosaurs.  That is unless your intention is to cause confusion.

Quote from: Around And About on February 17, 2011, 06:06:17 PM

I cannot decide which group is more damaging to FET: its genuine adherents or false ones.

It is not all that far fetched considering what has already been established regarding dinosaurs.  You may want to spend a little more time reviewing this thread.   

Hmm, yeah...or I may not. Good luck on your search for the truth though, or whatever.

I cannot decide which group is more damaging to FET: its genuine adherents or false ones.

Wise words indeed.

Recently, I was walking past a dinosaur and just for fun addressed it as "chopper" even though that is not its real name.  The dinosaur did a double take and then responded with exuberant laughter exhibiting a well developed sense of humor.

It seems you are placing a heavy burden on the response of the dinosaur. In fact it is much more probable that the dinosaur in question heard "chomper", a common ribbing among dinosaurs. The rest of your post is baseless specualtion.

Quote from: gotham on February 17, 2011, 05:14:09 PM

Recently, I was walking past a dinosaur and just for fun addressed it as "chopper" even though that is not its real name.  The dinosaur did a double take and then responded with exuberant laughter exhibiting a well developed sense of humor.

It seems you are placing a heavy burden on the response of the dinosaur. In fact it is much more probable that the dinosaur in question heard "chomper", a common ribbing among dinosaurs. The rest of your post is baseless specualtion.

Fascinating.  I was not aware of that common ribbing factor and am pleased to now know about it. I had previously spent a great deal of time mulling over the intrinsic nature of my post based on what I thought I had heard so I will now have to take a closer look at my conclusions.   

The reason is that much of dinosaurs "intelligence" was oppressed when the mammals took power. All records showing their witty repartee have been destroyed.

Actually, I saw something on the History channel that said that nearly all traces of human existence will disappear 50 million years after humans do.

But will our wit survive us, as it failed to do with the ancient dinosaurs?

But will our wit survive us, as it failed to do with the ancient dinosaurs?

With all due respect James, the dinosaurs wit did not fail to survive. Despite humans efforts to eradicate evidence we still have many works from the Greater Pangean Library, including all 6 volumes of Diplodocus Aurelius' "Nature and The Natural", which I find hilarious in places, but you really have to understand the context it was written in and who he was writing for.

Do not mock me, I am one of the leading scientists of our time. My theories are of the most profound importance!

Do not mock me, I am one of the leading scientists of our time. My theories are of the most profound importance!

James. Science can only make progress by challenging the theories that have existed before. This is what the dinosaurs failed to recognise when they built Azilaar.

James, I have a great deal of respect for your theories and knowledge.

Interesting where the impetus for research can spring from.  Recently, I was searching locally for an area to work on replicating some experiments in ENAG and look who was looking out in the direction where the solution may be? 




The canal goes for a distance of about 20 miles in that direction so it was lucky I was walking by right then.   

James, I have a great deal of respect for your theories and knowledge.

Interesting where the impetus for research can spring from.  Recently, I was searching locally for an area to work on replicating some experiments in ENAG and look who was looking out in the direction where the solution may be? 




The canal goes for a distance of about 20 miles in that direction so it was lucky I was walking by right then.   

  That is a very nice picture, I can see the rajasaurus in the sky very clearly.

That picture is obviously faked.

That picture is obviously faked.

Justify this statement.

By the standards of FET, if pictures can be faked, then they are faked. No similar claim by FE'ers has been justified further, so I see no need to justify this further.

It clearly is a doctored image, but it's very pretty all the same.

Point taken on the claim that photos can be doctored.  In this case between me, myself and I, I know that it is all original and I must accept the compliment about doctoring skills that I lack.

Dinosaurs are naturally contemplative and stoic; it does not surprise me in the slightest to see a large dinosaur gazing wistfully out at the waters on which its ancestors made their great voyages. It warms my heart to see such an image, thank you Gotham for your lovely picture.

Perhaps dinosaurs have collective consciousness. Yes. I believe that is the case.

When I see a flock of dinosaurs diving and swerving together in large number in the sky, I am often struck by the extent to which they seem to move with single-minded coordination and purpose, but so too do men when they march about or dance. I conceive that the minds of dinosaurs are linked to the same extent as those of men, that as Jung mentioned they have a cultural collective consciousness, that they have minds of their own but that on occassion these minds may link by way of their mental pathways or their cultural convergences.

When I see a flock of dinosaurs diving and swerving together in large number in the sky, I am often struck by the extent to which they seem to move with single-minded coordination and purpose, but so too do men when they march about or dance. I conceive that the minds of dinosaurs are linked to the same extent as those of men, that as Jung mentioned they have a cultural collective consciousness, that they have minds of their own but that on occassion these minds may link by way of their mental pathways or their cultural convergences.

Parsec already explained your mindlink with ichimaru, and it involved a penis and a butt. I haven't seen that with the dinosaurs, so if their minds link it must be in a different way.

Dinosaurs are naturally contemplative and stoic; it does not surprise me in the slightest to see a large dinosaur gazing wistfully out at the waters on which its ancestors made their great voyages. It warms my heart to see such an image, thank you Gotham for your lovely picture.

Unfortunately it is not natural for dinosaurs to stand on fences or rails. I must therefore conclude that the picture is fake.

Quote from: James on March 01, 2011, 07:18:05 PM

Dinosaurs are naturally contemplative and stoic; it does not surprise me in the slightest to see a large dinosaur gazing wistfully out at the waters on which its ancestors made their great voyages. It warms my heart to see such an image, thank you Gotham for your lovely picture.

Unfortunately it is not natural for dinosaurs to stand on fences or rails. I must therefore conclude that the picture is fake.

Modern dinosaurs are highly adaptable to their environment.

Quote from: James on March 01, 2011, 07:28:16 PM

When I see a flock of dinosaurs diving and swerving together in large number in the sky, I am often struck by the extent to which they seem to move with single-minded coordination and purpose, but so too do men when they march about or dance. I conceive that the minds of dinosaurs are linked to the same extent as those of men, that as Jung mentioned they have a cultural collective consciousness, that they have minds of their own but that on occassion these minds may link by way of their mental pathways or their cultural convergences.

Parsec already explained your mindlink with ichimaru, and it involved a penis and a butt. I haven't seen that with the dinosaurs, so if their minds link it must be in a different way.

Please don't make low content posts in the upper fora. If you want to explore our close intellectual admiration for each other, then please start a thread in the Lounge or RM.

Perhaps dinosaurs have collective consciousness. Yes. I believe that is the case.

Thats quite a jump to make within the span of one post.  Why do you think this is the case?