The book Earth Not a Globe proves the earth is flat.http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za00.htm
[now disproved] bendy light theory
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
Quote from: Thermal Detonator on November 01, 2009, 03:59:37 AM[now disproved] bendy light theoryPlease stop claiming that bendy light has been disproved. It has not.
Your beliefs are irrelevant in this thread.
Quote from: markjo on October 31, 2009, 11:59:57 PMTom, until you can show us a photo of what you believe the sun really looks like in a vacuum, you have no basis of comparison between a genuine and a fake picture of the sun in a vacuum.Why, are there stage lights in space?
Tom, until you can show us a photo of what you believe the sun really looks like in a vacuum, you have no basis of comparison between a genuine and a fake picture of the sun in a vacuum.
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on November 01, 2009, 03:50:55 AMQuote from: markjo on October 31, 2009, 11:59:57 PMTom, until you can show us a photo of what you believe the sun really looks like in a vacuum, you have no basis of comparison between a genuine and a fake picture of the sun in a vacuum.Why, are there stage lights in space?I don't know. Can you provide of picture of a stage light in a vacuum so that we can compare that with the Apollo picture in question?
Better bring a better augment, something not so stupid.
What makes you think it is a stage light?
Quote from: markjo on November 01, 2009, 08:43:13 AMQuote from: Tom Bishop on November 01, 2009, 03:50:55 AMQuote from: markjo on October 31, 2009, 11:59:57 PMTom, until you can show us a photo of what you believe the sun really looks like in a vacuum, you have no basis of comparison between a genuine and a fake picture of the sun in a vacuum.Why, are there stage lights in space?I don't know. Can you provide of picture of a stage light in a vacuum so that we can compare that with the Apollo picture in question?Actually you're the one who is supposed to be justifying the existence of stage lights in space.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on November 01, 2009, 12:28:43 PMQuote from: markjo on November 01, 2009, 08:43:13 AMQuote from: Tom Bishop on November 01, 2009, 03:50:55 AMQuote from: markjo on October 31, 2009, 11:59:57 PMTom, until you can show us a photo of what you believe the sun really looks like in a vacuum, you have no basis of comparison between a genuine and a fake picture of the sun in a vacuum.Why, are there stage lights in space?I don't know. Can you provide of picture of a stage light in a vacuum so that we can compare that with the Apollo picture in question?Actually you're the one who is supposed to be justifying the existence of stage lights in space.Answer me this then, if you don't know what a light looks like in space, how can that photo try to justify it? Or how do you know the real sun wouldn't look the same when messed with in a photo editor?
Actually you're the one who is supposed to be justifying the existence of stage lights in space.
The real sun doesn't look like that in a photo editor.
Quote from: Round_Earth(No, flat) on November 01, 2009, 12:30:55 PMWhat makes you think it is a stage light? http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=33855.msg830773#msg830773
Quote from: Christianrocker90 on November 01, 2009, 12:34:54 PMQuote from: Tom Bishop on November 01, 2009, 12:28:43 PMQuote from: markjo on November 01, 2009, 08:43:13 AMQuote from: Tom Bishop on November 01, 2009, 03:50:55 AMQuote from: markjo on October 31, 2009, 11:59:57 PMTom, until you can show us a photo of what you believe the sun really looks like in a vacuum, you have no basis of comparison between a genuine and a fake picture of the sun in a vacuum.Why, are there stage lights in space?I don't know. Can you provide of picture of a stage light in a vacuum so that we can compare that with the Apollo picture in question?Actually you're the one who is supposed to be justifying the existence of stage lights in space.Answer me this then, if you don't know what a light looks like in space, how can that photo try to justify it? Or how do you know the real sun wouldn't look the same when messed with in a photo editor?The real sun doesn't look like that in a photo editor. Try it yourself.
Why do they always say we have the burden of proof? There is so much proof out there that proves them all wrong. They choose not to accept it (even though its kind of retarded). Once one of them actually goes to space they wont ever be able to prove themselves right. All they have done so far is make up there own non proven ideas and make a website. Im sorry FE's but the burden of proof is on you. RE's have tons of proof.
Quote from: Milky on November 01, 2009, 10:09:58 PMWhy do they always say we have the burden of proof? There is so much proof out there that proves them all wrong. They choose not to accept it (even though its kind of retarded). Once one of them actually goes to space they wont ever be able to prove themselves right. All they have done so far is make up there own non proven ideas and make a website. Im sorry FE's but the burden of proof is on you. RE's have tons of proof.We aren't the ones who came and joined your website and started demanding proof, nor did we force you to start posting here. You've come here to us, so the burden of proof is on you. Alternatively, you're free to leave at any time.
This is not some proslytizing faith. Unlike the high priests of globularism, we encourage you to come to your own conclusions.