Tangible lit means "touchable".
...
eyes
So you appeal to tangible meaning touchable, and then jump straight to your eyes, and appeal to what you can see, not touch?
If you are going to jump to what can be seen, there is no point in bringing up the literate definition of tangible.
I'm sorry, but do YOU have any tangible proof than when your eyes see an area that looks flat
Spouting the same delusional BS wont help you.
You should be sorry for spouting so much BS just because you can't handle reality.
I am yet to see an area that looks flat.
Plenty of locations are rough, hilly terrain; and some appears to be a very large curve, as evidenced by the horizon blocking the view to distant objects, yet moving towards the horizon or getting higher allowing me to see those objects.
a level tells you an area is flat
The level doesn't tell you it is flat, the straight edge would, and that has some level of uncertainty.
It certainly is not telling you that Earth is not curved.
The best it could tell you is that the rate of curvature is less than some value.
your hands and feet touch an area and you don't feel on a slope, you're "really" standing on a curve.
Why would you feel a slope?
A blind person could prove you wrong.
So a blind person would be better at arguing for a FE than you?
Because you are yet to provide anything that proves Earth is flat.
I already mentioned this. ... You didn't get it (as usual)
You mean you baselessly asserted it, without any rational justification, had it entirely refuted, and then proceeded to flee from that refutation because you can't handle reality.