Regarding the Photoelectric Suspension Theory..

  • 68 Replies
  • 15235 Views
?

EireEngineer

  • 1204
  • +0/-0
  • Woo Nemesis
Re: Regarding the Photoelectric Suspension Theory..
« Reply #60 on: November 03, 2009, 05:58:58 PM »
Yeah. Notice how he shut up.  I will be happy to clarify any questions he has about the operation of RADAR if he still doesnt get it. lol
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the precipitate.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: Regarding the Photoelectric Suspension Theory..
« Reply #61 on: November 03, 2009, 07:33:47 PM »
Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the Arecibo, those are NASA funded installations, aren't they?

I knew you would result back to special pleading. And yes they are, so?

Well if it's NASA controlled and funded, it doesn't really help your case.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45093
  • +87/-123
Re: Regarding the Photoelectric Suspension Theory..
« Reply #62 on: November 03, 2009, 08:34:31 PM »
Well if it's NASA controlled and funded, it doesn't really help your case.

And if that's the best you can do, it doesn't help you case much either, Tom.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: Regarding the Photoelectric Suspension Theory..
« Reply #63 on: November 03, 2009, 08:57:34 PM »
Well if it's NASA controlled and funded, it doesn't really help your case.

And if that's the best you can do, it doesn't help you case much either, Tom.

The fact that your "evidence" is all controlled and produced by single entity and all you can do is point your finger and say "NASA said so," demonstrates the weakness of your arguments.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45093
  • +87/-123
Re: Regarding the Photoelectric Suspension Theory..
« Reply #64 on: November 03, 2009, 10:02:51 PM »
Well if it's NASA controlled and funded, it doesn't really help your case.

And if that's the best you can do, it doesn't help you case much either, Tom.

The fact that your "evidence" is all controlled and produced by single entity and all you can do is point your finger and say "NASA said so," demonstrates the weakness of your arguments.

What makes you believe that NASA controls and produces all of the evidence?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: Regarding the Photoelectric Suspension Theory..
« Reply #65 on: November 03, 2009, 11:00:08 PM »
What makes you believe that NASA controls and produces all of the evidence?

Because all I ever hear is "NASA said so".

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45093
  • +87/-123
Re: Regarding the Photoelectric Suspension Theory..
« Reply #66 on: November 04, 2009, 06:18:34 AM »
What makes you believe that NASA controls and produces all of the evidence?

Because all I ever hear is "NASA said so".

Then I suggest that you clean the wax out of your ears.  There have been tons of posts that have provided evidence with no reference to NASA.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Thermal Detonator

  • 3125
  • +0/-0
  • Definitively the best avatar maker.
Re: Regarding the Photoelectric Suspension Theory..
« Reply #67 on: November 04, 2009, 12:35:52 PM »
What makes you believe that NASA controls and produces all of the evidence?

Because all I ever hear is "NASA said so".

Both Skeleton and myself pointed out this experiment had also been conducted by MIT. Which is not NASA funded.
Gayer doesn't live in an atmosphere of vaporised mustard like you appear to, based on your latest photo.

?

EireEngineer

  • 1204
  • +0/-0
  • Woo Nemesis
Re: Regarding the Photoelectric Suspension Theory..
« Reply #68 on: November 07, 2009, 11:22:14 AM »
Yes, but Tom will probably come up with a theory about MIT being part of the conspiracy.  Special pleading atop special pleading.  If he ever bothered to actually look at the science instead of blaming a conspiracy, he would change his mind. Wait...I forgot who I am talking about.
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the precipitate.