« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

conclusive evidence

  • 30 Replies
  • 14792 Views
?

steveo66443

conclusive evidence
« on: October 04, 2009, 05:55:16 AM »
In frequently asked questions you say there is no "conclusive evidence" to support that the world is a globe, I would like to see your conclusive evidence and no, maps and Mr James McIntyre's models do not fall under conclusive evidence. And if cannot provide the evidence where did you get your information from and further more how can you prove that the earth is not a globe.
Logged
*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2009, 07:50:46 PM »
Read "Earth Not a Globe" by Samuel Rowboatham. There is a copy free online.

Also, since the earth appears flat from out local area, we assume it is flat until sufficient evidence is given otherwise.
Logged
?

sphaira

  • 96
  • +0/-0
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2009, 07:54:32 PM »
the countless photos from space and satellites are still not enough to convince you, you arrogant fools?
Logged
?

youareallwrong

Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #3 on: October 04, 2009, 07:55:21 PM »
Quote from: steveo66443 on October 04, 2009, 05:55:16 AM
In frequently asked questions you say there is no "conclusive evidence" to support that the world is a globe, I would like to see your conclusive evidence and no, maps and Mr James McIntyre's models do not fall under conclusive evidence. And if cannot provide the evidence where did you get your information from and further more how can you prove that the earth is not a globe.
They have none.  ;D
Logged
*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2009, 07:56:34 PM »
Quote from: sphaira on October 04, 2009, 07:54:32 PM
the countless photos from space and satellites are still not enough to convince you, you arrogant fools?
I have countless photos of dragons, but I still can't ride a flying, fire breathing monster, now can I?
Logged
?

youareallwrong

Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2009, 07:57:46 PM »
Quote from: Waste of Mind on October 04, 2009, 07:56:34 PM
Quote from: sphaira on October 04, 2009, 07:54:32 PM
the countless photos from space and satellites are still not enough to convince you, you arrogant fools?
I have countless photos of dragons, but I still can't ride a flying, fire breathing monster, now can I?
Too bad you don't have 'photos' of dragons.
Logged
?

sphaira

  • 96
  • +0/-0
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2009, 07:59:17 PM »
you have drawings or paintings of dragons i'm sure.  look up the difference between them and photograph before you try to make an intelligent comment.
Logged
*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2009, 08:00:17 PM »
Quote from: youareallwrong on October 04, 2009, 07:57:46 PM
Quote from: Waste of Mind on October 04, 2009, 07:56:34 PM
Quote from: sphaira on October 04, 2009, 07:54:32 PM
the countless photos from space and satellites are still not enough to convince you, you arrogant fools?
I have countless photos of dragons, but I still can't ride a flying, fire breathing monster, now can I?
Too bad you don't have 'photos' of dragons.
http://images.google.com/images?q=dragon&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

These are just as authentic as the "photos" produced by NASA.
Logged
?

youareallwrong

Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2009, 08:04:41 PM »
Quote from: Waste of Mind on October 04, 2009, 08:00:17 PM
Quote from: youareallwrong on October 04, 2009, 07:57:46 PM
Quote from: Waste of Mind on October 04, 2009, 07:56:34 PM
Quote from: sphaira on October 04, 2009, 07:54:32 PM
the countless photos from space and satellites are still not enough to convince you, you arrogant fools?
I have countless photos of dragons, but I still can't ride a flying, fire breathing monster, now can I?
Too bad you don't have 'photos' of dragons.
http://images.google.com/images?q=dragon&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

These are just as authentic as the "photos" produced by NASA.
Nope. Not at all.
Logged
?

sphaira

  • 96
  • +0/-0
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2009, 08:08:31 PM »
those are drawings, paintings, computer generated images which have absolutely no truth to them at all, which is a fact.  your opinion is that the NASA photos are fake, and you really have no substantiated proof of such
Logged
*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2009, 08:10:58 PM »
Quote from: sphaira on October 04, 2009, 08:08:31 PM
those are drawings, paintings, computer generated images which have absolutely no truth to them at all, which is a fact.
Quote from: sphaira on October 04, 2009, 08:08:31 PM
your opinion is that the dragon photos are fake, and you really have no substantiated proof of such
Logged
?

sphaira

  • 96
  • +0/-0
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #11 on: October 04, 2009, 08:15:18 PM »
oh clever you, i absolutely love your wittiness.  again, those are not photographs in case you forgot from elementary school, here is a definition of a photograph.

pho?to?graph  (ft-grf)
n.
An image, especially a positive print, recorded by a camera and reproduced on a photosensitive surface.
v. pho?to?graphed, pho?to?graph?ing, pho?to?graphs
v.tr.
To take a photograph of.
v.intr.
1. To practice photography.
2. To be the subject for photographs: She photographs well.
photo?grapha?ble adj.
pho?togra?pher (f-tgr-fr) n.
Logged
*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #12 on: October 04, 2009, 08:17:36 PM »
What if I take a picture of them while they're on my computer screen? Then I can develop them and they will fit that definition of "photograph".
Logged
?

sphaira

  • 96
  • +0/-0
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #13 on: October 04, 2009, 08:21:44 PM »
i shall then rephrase.  get a camera, go out to a dragon's lair and take a picture, with your camera, of the Dragon.  then i may believe your comments have some validity.
Logged
*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #14 on: October 04, 2009, 08:23:12 PM »
Quote from: sphaira on October 04, 2009, 08:21:44 PM
i shall then rephrase.  get a camera, go out to a dragon's lair and take a picture, with your camera, of the Dragon.  then i may believe your comments have some validity.
I did, here you go.
Logged
?

sphaira

  • 96
  • +0/-0
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #15 on: October 04, 2009, 08:24:39 PM »
stop being a smartass and instead provide real arguments that don't make you seem like a mental deficient.
Logged
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #16 on: October 04, 2009, 08:26:55 PM »
Quote from: sphaira on October 04, 2009, 08:24:39 PM
stop being a smartass and instead provide real arguments that don't make you seem like a mental deficient.

Oh, sweet irony.
Logged
Quote from: Ævan on August 11, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #17 on: October 04, 2009, 08:27:15 PM »
Quote from: sphaira on October 04, 2009, 08:24:39 PM
stop being a smartass and instead provide real arguments that don't make you seem like a mental deficient.
You tell me to take a picture of a dragon, I show you a picture of a dragon. My dragon picture is just as authentic as NASA's pictures.
Logged
?

sphaira

  • 96
  • +0/-0
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #18 on: October 04, 2009, 08:28:48 PM »
i told you to take a photograph of a dragon, that is a computer generated image.  can you actually understand the difference??
Logged
*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #19 on: October 04, 2009, 08:31:27 PM »
I never said anything to the contrary. My dragon picture is still just as authentic as NASA's.
Logged
?

sphaira

  • 96
  • +0/-0
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #20 on: October 04, 2009, 08:35:13 PM »
as of right now, the NASA bullshit is irrelevant.  provide me with a PHOTOGRAPH of a dragon, not an image that is either drawn, painted, generated on a computer, or any other method that is not taken from a camera.
Logged
*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #21 on: October 04, 2009, 08:36:49 PM »
Ok, I took a picture of my screen. Now are dragons real?
Logged
?

sphaira

  • 96
  • +0/-0
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #22 on: October 04, 2009, 08:42:58 PM »
agai, stop being a smartass.  provide me with a photograph of a real, live dragon that you took yourself whilst in the company of a dragon
Logged
*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #23 on: October 04, 2009, 08:43:54 PM »
Quote from: sphaira on October 04, 2009, 08:42:58 PM
agai, stop being a smartass.  provide me with a photograph of a real, live dragon that you took yourself whilst in the company of a dragon
Quote from: Waste of Mind on October 04, 2009, 08:23:12 PM
I did, here you go.

Logged
?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #24 on: October 04, 2009, 08:45:09 PM »
How about an eyewitness account?  I saw two dragons yesterday.
Logged
?

sphaira

  • 96
  • +0/-0
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #25 on: October 04, 2009, 08:51:52 PM »
ah and the ridiculousness continues.  if you actually think that your dragon image is a photograph, then it is as much a photograph as this is:

http://www.ezmuseum.com/images/salvadordali.jpg
Logged
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #26 on: October 04, 2009, 08:53:40 PM »
Quote from: sphaira on October 04, 2009, 08:51:52 PM
ah and the ridiculousness continues.  if you actually think that your dragon image is a photograph, then it is as much a photograph as this is:

http://www.ezmuseum.com/images/salvadordali.jpg

So you would agree that photographs, in themselves, prove nothing?
Logged
Quote from: Ævan on August 11, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45160
  • +98/-136
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #27 on: October 04, 2009, 09:21:37 PM »
Quote from: Waste of Mind on October 04, 2009, 08:00:17 PM
Quote from: youareallwrong on October 04, 2009, 07:57:46 PM
Quote from: Waste of Mind on October 04, 2009, 07:56:34 PM
Quote from: sphaira on October 04, 2009, 07:54:32 PM
the countless photos from space and satellites are still not enough to convince you, you arrogant fools?
I have countless photos of dragons, but I still can't ride a flying, fire breathing monster, now can I?
Too bad you don't have 'photos' of dragons.
http://images.google.com/images?q=dragon&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

These are just as authentic as the "photos" produced by NASA.

Not all dragons are of the flying, fire breathing type (from your link):
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #28 on: October 05, 2009, 08:19:55 AM »
Quote from: markjo on October 04, 2009, 09:21:37 PM

Not all dragons are of the flying, fire breathing type (from your link):


Yep, those look just like the ones I saw Saturday.  I was extremely disappointed about the missing wings.
Logged
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45160
  • +98/-136
Re: conclusive evidence
« Reply #29 on: October 05, 2009, 09:43:16 AM »
Quote from: Mrs. Peach on October 05, 2009, 08:19:55 AM
Quote from: markjo on October 04, 2009, 09:21:37 PM

Not all dragons are of the flying, fire breathing type (from your link):

Yep, those look just like the ones I saw Saturday.  I was extremely disappointed about the missing wings.

Chinese dragons generally don't have wings either.
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »