Temperature of the crust

Quote from: John Davis on October 01, 2009, 12:09:11 PM

Quote from: Anorthosite on September 30, 2009, 04:13:53 AM

Quote from: Tom Bishop on September 30, 2009, 03:58:34 AM

Quote from: Anorthosite on September 30, 2009, 03:57:01 AM

Quote from: Tom Bishop on September 30, 2009, 03:25:40 AM

Quote

The FAQ doesn't say "known".

Obviously it's not referring to the "unknown" earth.

So you're supporting the infinite earth model?

Does every flat earther feel this way?

What part of "unknown" do you have trouble understanding?

Because if it isn't infinite, my original & unaddressed point still stands.

He's not talking about the infinite model - hes talking about areas yet to be discovered.  Theres no telling how much landmass is beyond the Antarctic on the Cambridge model.

It would have to be quite staggeringly large for there not to be a temperature gradient.

And if we're not in the middle of it, there would be an offset temperature gradient as well.

Just to make sure we are all on the same page here:

Why do you expect fluctuations in temperature?

The edges of the earth would be exposed to space.

in RE, every where you go, at a certain depth the temperature is pretty even, and stays that way the deeper you dig.

in FE, the further south you went and made an equal depth hole, you'd get a colder temperature due to loss of heat into space.

Did we ever get a satisfactory answer to this one?

Did we ever get a satisfactory answer to this one?

Anyone able to answer this?

How do you know that the temperature of the crust is in Antarctica, have you checked?

The edges of the earth would be exposed to space.

in RE, every where you go, at a certain depth the temperature is pretty even, and stays that way the deeper you dig.

in FE, the further south you went and made an equal depth hole, you'd get a colder temperature due to loss of heat into space.

The difference would be completely negligible if the Earth had a large enough radius and none given the infinite earth model.

How do you know that the temperature of the crust is in Antarctica, have you checked?

Why mention Antarctica? The effect should be noticeable long before you reach that far south.

Quote from: SupahLovah on October 13, 2009, 09:28:53 AM

The edges of the earth would be exposed to space.

in RE, every where you go, at a certain depth the temperature is pretty even, and stays that way the deeper you dig.

in FE, the further south you went and made an equal depth hole, you'd get a colder temperature due to loss of heat into space.

The difference would be completely negligible if the Earth had a large enough radius and none given the infinite earth model.

This

Quote from: Raist on June 20, 2010, 05:19:18 PM

Quote from: SupahLovah on October 13, 2009, 09:28:53 AM

The edges of the earth would be exposed to space.

in RE, every where you go, at a certain depth the temperature is pretty even, and stays that way the deeper you dig.

in FE, the further south you went and made an equal depth hole, you'd get a colder temperature due to loss of heat into space.

The difference would be completely negligible if the Earth had a large enough radius and none given the infinite earth model.

This

Do you consider this to be evidence that the earth is either infinite or stretches well beyond the proposed ice wall? Be careful how you answer this question, there is a follow up.

Quote from: John Davis on June 21, 2010, 12:01:49 PM

Quote from: Raist on June 20, 2010, 05:19:18 PM

Quote from: SupahLovah on October 13, 2009, 09:28:53 AM

The edges of the earth would be exposed to space.

in RE, every where you go, at a certain depth the temperature is pretty even, and stays that way the deeper you dig.

in FE, the further south you went and made an equal depth hole, you'd get a colder temperature due to loss of heat into space.

The difference would be completely negligible if the Earth had a large enough radius and none given the infinite earth model.

This

Do you consider this to be evidence that the earth is either infinite or stretches well beyond the proposed ice wall? Be careful how you answer this question, there is a follow up.

Evidence? No one has yet shown that a temperature change in the crust doesn't happen.

Also, it could be assumed that there is a thin and far reaching magma layer within the Earth.

No one has even shown, mathematically or otherwise, that there would be a noticeable drop in temperature between the two.

Evidence? No one has yet shown that a temperature change in the crust doesn't happen.

Studies of thousands of points in the earth's crust have been made. There is no drop in temperature as you go south.

Also, it could be assumed that there is a thin and far reaching magma layer within the Earth.

Why would this matter?

No one has even shown, mathematically or otherwise, that there would be a noticeable drop in temperature between the two.

To what are you referring when you say "the two"?

Quote from: Raist on June 22, 2010, 09:41:43 AM

Evidence? No one has yet shown that a temperature change in the crust doesn't happen.

Studies of thousands of points in the earth's crust have been made. There is no drop in temperature as you go south.

Quote

Also, it could be assumed that there is a thin and far reaching magma layer within the Earth.

Why would this matter?

Quote

No one has even shown, mathematically or otherwise, that there would be a noticeable drop in temperature between the two.

To what are you referring when you say "the two"?

The two models.

It would matter because a flat and large magma chamber within the earth would keep the entire earth at a more steady temp than a small round one.

Please show that a temperature change would happen in fe mathematically or otherwise plz.

Because the earth is infinite.

I understand that low-content posting is not allowed in this Forum. What evidence do you have to support this claim?

I see a great deal of evidence to the contrary of your statement. Thermodynamics for example would require a infinite number of "spotlights" to keep even our section as warm as it is. The photographs of the Earth from space show it as finite. The testimony of astronauts describe it as finite. Various satellites in orbit circumnavigate the globe in various orientations and inclinations can be confirmed any clear night by an unbiased earth-based observer.

Quote

The FAQ doesn't say "known".

Obviously it's not referring to the "unknown" earth.

How do you know thier is more to the earth?

Quote from: Tom Bishop on September 30, 2009, 03:25:40 AM

Quote

The FAQ doesn't say "known".

Obviously it's not referring to the "unknown" earth.

How do you know thier there is more to the earth?

Why does he need to know that to state that the known Earth is the known Earth?

Quote from: The Question1 on June 28, 2010, 10:35:51 AM

Quote from: Tom Bishop on September 30, 2009, 03:25:40 AM

Quote

The FAQ doesn't say "known".

Obviously it's not referring to the "unknown" earth.

How do you know thier there is more to the earth?

Why does he need to know that to state that the known Earth is the known Earth?

Obviously because he is implying thier is an unknown part of the earth not covered in any of the FE maps(beyond the icewall no doubt.)

Quote from: John Davis on September 27, 2009, 10:57:13 PM

Because the earth is infinite.

I understand that low-content posting is not allowed in this Forum. What evidence do you have to support this claim?

I see a great deal of evidence to the contrary of your statement. Thermodynamics for example would require a infinite number of "spotlights" to keep even our section as warm as it is. The photographs of the Earth from space show it as finite. The testimony of astronauts describe it as finite. Various satellites in orbit circumnavigate the globe in various orientations and inclinations can be confirmed any clear night by an unbiased earth-based observer.

Sorry if that was considered low content to you.

The most obvious and easy way to see the infinite nature of the earth is to simply measure its gravitational pull fairly at different altitudes from the slab.

To address your other claims, I don't think you have shown that it is true that there would be an infinite number of spot lights to keep our section warm.  However, there is likely an infinite amount of spot lights over the earth based on simple probability.  The view of the earth from above is distorted (incorrect word) by the aether.  Satellites are eitehr stationary or rotating above in the aether.

Whats aether

Quote from: ClockTower on June 28, 2010, 05:53:37 AM

Quote from: John Davis on September 27, 2009, 10:57:13 PM

Because the earth is infinite.

I understand that low-content posting is not allowed in this Forum. What evidence do you have to support this claim?

I see a great deal of evidence to the contrary of your statement. Thermodynamics for example would require a infinite number of "spotlights" to keep even our section as warm as it is. The photographs of the Earth from space show it as finite. The testimony of astronauts describe it as finite. Various satellites in orbit circumnavigate the globe in various orientations and inclinations can be confirmed any clear night by an unbiased earth-based observer.

Sorry if that was considered low content to you.

The most obvious and easy way to see the infinite nature of the earth is to simply measure its gravitational pull fairly at different altitudes from the slab.

To address your other claims, I don't think you have shown that it is true that there would be an infinite number of spot lights to keep our section warm.  However, there is likely an infinite amount of spot lights over the earth based on simple probability.  The view of the earth from above is distorted (incorrect word) by the aether.  Satellites are eitehr stationary or rotating above in the aether.

Your posts continue with their low content. First, FET does not agree whether the FE is finite. Second, do you realize that you have to infer an infinite number of 'suns' provides an infinite amount of energy to tackle the problem? Third, FET doesn't support sustained space travel, so how would anything get above the aether and stay there. Tell you what: head over to the believer's forum and when the believers agree on the size of the Earth, visit us again.