In Case of Zombies

  • 856 Replies
  • 121604 Views
?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #270 on: August 25, 2009, 05:50:48 PM »
Well, that would be a trade-off, as it would make getting the new maggot stocks so much easier. 

?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #271 on: August 25, 2009, 06:00:58 PM »
Have on hand large flocks of maggot eating robins and chickadees for the squeamish.  :)

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #272 on: August 25, 2009, 06:23:19 PM »
I think the zombies will naturally have maggots. Flies will lay eggs on a normal person's dying flesh, a zombie that is unable to even attempt to remove them would be full of maggots in weeks. That would probably be the number one cause of zombie "death"

Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #273 on: August 25, 2009, 11:04:40 PM »
personally I'd either go out to my friends farm who has an ample supply of guns and ammo for the zombies that would head out there, or go about 2 miles where there is a Sams club, Wal-mart and home depot all next to each other where i can fortify the no windowed cement minimal doors Sam's club with supply's i get from home depot, and get food weapons from Wal-mart
My lawn has holiday spirt

*

Chris Spaghetti

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12631
  • +0/-4
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #274 on: August 26, 2009, 04:46:34 AM »
Problem: Everyone is going to try and head to the local supermarket. Chances are good that most of the deaths in places like wal-mart won't be from zombies but fighting amongst survivors.

*

Wendy

  • 18427
  • +0/-0
  • I laugh cus you fake
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #275 on: August 26, 2009, 05:04:25 AM »
True. Zombies are most likely to have numerous infections as well. The exposed flesh of their wounds and just general decay will be like a haven for bacteria.

Depending on what zombie universe you've got, you won't have that much decay in some cases.
Here's an explanation for ya. Lurk moar. Every single point you brought up has been posted, reposted, debated and debunked. There is a search function on this forum, and it is very easy to use.

*

Jack1704

  • Official Member
  • 11207
  • +0/-0
  • Francine?!?!?
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #276 on: August 26, 2009, 09:58:24 AM »
Ahat sort of universe needs clarity in certain cases to determine a solution.
Stop all this nonesense and bring on the lapdancers.
I understand Jack1704. It's a Brit thing.

?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #277 on: September 01, 2009, 03:23:53 PM »
Now we can get back to the reeeealy serious stuff.  ;D

*

Jack1704

  • Official Member
  • 11207
  • +0/-0
  • Francine?!?!?
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #278 on: September 01, 2009, 03:25:03 PM »
I missed this thread!!!
Stop all this nonesense and bring on the lapdancers.
I understand Jack1704. It's a Brit thing.

*

Sexual Harassment Panda

  • 7071
  • +0/-0
  • Now more sophisticated
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #279 on: September 01, 2009, 03:25:57 PM »
How long will zombies last without eating brains?
|^^^^^^^^^^^\||_____          
|     STFU          |||""'|"""\___            O
| ______________|||___|__|__|)          -|- 
  (@)@)""""""**|(@)(@)**|(@)          / \

New Flat Earth FAQ: http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30512.0

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10930
  • +0/-0
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #280 on: September 01, 2009, 03:26:32 PM »
They don't need to eat at all, especially not brains.
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

*

Jack1704

  • Official Member
  • 11207
  • +0/-0
  • Francine?!?!?
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #281 on: September 01, 2009, 03:29:18 PM »
They don't need to eat at all, especially not brains.
So why do they?
Stop all this nonesense and bring on the lapdancers.
I understand Jack1704. It's a Brit thing.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10930
  • +0/-0
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #282 on: September 01, 2009, 03:30:22 PM »
They don't need to eat at all, especially not brains.
So why do they?

Biting is an instinct implanted by the virus to spread it, they're not intended to actually eat them.
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #283 on: September 01, 2009, 03:44:45 PM »
I am baiting some traps with some really sticky caramel.  That should take care of their really rotten teeth.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #284 on: September 01, 2009, 03:45:05 PM »
They don't need to eat at all, especially not brains.
So why do they?

Biting is an instinct implanted by the virus to spread it, they're not intended to actually eat them.

Then they would live only a few weeks. They would have no source of energy.

*

Sexual Harassment Panda

  • 7071
  • +0/-0
  • Now more sophisticated
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #285 on: September 02, 2009, 01:29:48 PM »
They don't need to eat at all, especially not brains.
So why do they?

Biting is an instinct implanted by the virus to spread it, they're not intended to actually eat them.

Then they would live only a few weeks. They would have no source of energy.

This was what I was going to point out.
|^^^^^^^^^^^\||_____          
|     STFU          |||""'|"""\___            O
| ______________|||___|__|__|)          -|- 
  (@)@)""""""**|(@)(@)**|(@)          / \

New Flat Earth FAQ: http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30512.0

?

Nomad

  • Official Member
  • 16894
  • +0/-0
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #286 on: September 02, 2009, 01:34:52 PM »
I agree.  Being "undead" shouldn't be exempt from needing to metabolize food to provide energy for motor functions.  As with a living body, undead bodies would probably start cannibalizing itself for energy and muscles would atrophy to the point of non-mobility...
Nomad is a superhero.

8/30 NEVAR FORGET

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #287 on: September 04, 2009, 11:35:19 AM »
Or, something that has NEVER been in a zombie movie, they would eat each other. They have no legitimate way of differentiating a zombie from a normal person. They should behave like rabid animals, not like huge mass pack hunters.

They should attack anything on site, zombie or otherwise, which would also allow you a better chance of survival with them killing each other.

*

Jack1704

  • Official Member
  • 11207
  • +0/-0
  • Francine?!?!?
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #288 on: September 04, 2009, 11:47:10 AM »
Or, something that has NEVER been in a zombie movie, they would eat each other. They have no legitimate way of differentiating a zombie from a normal person. They should behave like rabid animals, not like huge mass pack hunters.

They should attack anything on site, zombie or otherwise, which would also allow you a better chance of survival with them killing each other.
Too right, if they kill each other, then you would only need to hold up a few days.
Stop all this nonesense and bring on the lapdancers.
I understand Jack1704. It's a Brit thing.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10930
  • +0/-0
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #289 on: September 04, 2009, 12:34:18 PM »
Or, something that has NEVER been in a zombie movie, they would eat each other. They have no legitimate way of differentiating a zombie from a normal person. They should behave like rabid animals, not like huge mass pack hunters.

They should attack anything on site, zombie or otherwise, which would also allow you a better chance of survival with them killing each other.

And if they only eat fresh meat like nearly all other predator?
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #290 on: September 04, 2009, 01:08:41 PM »
And like I said right off the bat, we should hire a zombie consultant so we have a better idea of what we might be dealing with.
  No one ever listens to me.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45100
  • +87/-125
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #291 on: September 04, 2009, 01:16:58 PM »
And like I said right off the bat, we should hire a zombie consultant so we have a better idea of what we might be dealing with.
  No one ever listens to me.

Like this guy?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10930
  • +0/-0
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #292 on: September 04, 2009, 01:19:41 PM »
And like I said right off the bat, we should hire a zombie consultant so we have a better idea of what we might be dealing with.
  No one ever listens to me.

Like this guy?


I would hire him.
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

?

Proleg

Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #293 on: September 04, 2009, 01:21:38 PM »
Rob Zombie necros long-dead movie franchises. He's earned his title.

?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #294 on: September 04, 2009, 01:26:03 PM »
We should ask for credentials and recommendations, first.  Frankly, he looks a little too strung out to accomplish much of anything but he does indeed make a great first impression.

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10930
  • +0/-0
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #295 on: September 04, 2009, 01:42:26 PM »
We should ask for credentials and recommendations, first.  Frankly, he looks a little too strung out to accomplish much of anything but he does indeed make a great first impression.

He's seen more B-movies than any other living man, that's a hell of a qualification.
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #296 on: September 04, 2009, 01:54:23 PM »
Good point.
Next question: what is his fee?

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10930
  • +0/-0
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #297 on: September 04, 2009, 02:04:55 PM »
Good point.
Next question: what is his fee?

He's a pretty cool guy, I think he'd take a position of zombie consultant for the Flat Earth Society for free, it's not a full time job (and doesn't afraid of anything or something).
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

?

Anteater7171

  • 9408
  • +0/-0
  • I am the FAQ!!!
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #298 on: September 04, 2009, 02:07:01 PM »
Ideally I'd take one of these, ammo, and food, then run for the hills



It's light
Accurate
Compact
Light ammunition, so you can carry a ton
Reasonable power, enough to kill a zombie or harvest game
50 Round magazine


Currently the best I have is this


Exact same set up but an Eotech as opposed to an Aimpoint, and no flashlight.

Pretty light
Extremely accurate
Light ammo, though not quite as light as the 5.7
30 round magazines
Decent power, enough to blow a zombies head up
I don't remember anything. Well, I do, but it's really vague. Like I was on drugs the whole time.

?

Mrs. Peach

  • Official Member
  • 6229
  • +0/-0
Re: In Case of Zombies
« Reply #299 on: September 04, 2009, 02:59:18 PM »
Ideally I'd take one of these, ammo, and food, then run for the hills


Yeah, but what if it turns out that these are mountain zombies? or hill zombies?
They aren't all beach zombies.