atheism billboard

  • 304 Replies
  • 67966 Views
*

Soze

  • 1291
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Proponent
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #30 on: July 26, 2009, 07:17:46 PM »
So what is a disbelief? A belief in a negative?
No, it's a lack of a belief.  ::)

When approaching something scientifically a lack of belief is default. A belief requires evidence. See the difference now? There is no evidence needed to be skeptical. As an atheist I don't say "god doesn't exist", because that would also require evidence.

Skepticism = 0
Belief = 1
Belief in opposite = -1

Yes, people that want to force a disbelief on someone else are stupid, and has issues.
Nobody said they were forcing anything. You're intentionally misrepresenting the argument. Also fixed because people is a plural word.

Quote
If someone else's belief bothers you, then you have issues.
Who says it does?
« Last Edit: July 26, 2009, 07:19:19 PM by Soze »

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #31 on: July 26, 2009, 08:00:08 PM »
So what is a disbelief? A belief in a negative?
No, it's a lack of a belief.  ::)

When approaching something scientifically a lack of belief is default. A belief requires evidence. See the difference now? There is no evidence needed to be skeptical. As an atheist I don't say "god doesn't exist", because that would also require evidence.

Skepticism = 0
Belief = 1
Belief in opposite = -1


So they are forming a group for people that do not know whether or not there is a god? So I assume these groups would be doing work to see whether or not there is a god.

What you have described are people that believe there is no God.

*

Soze

  • 1291
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Proponent
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #32 on: July 26, 2009, 08:08:10 PM »
So they are forming a group for people that do not know whether or not there is a god? So I assume these groups would be doing work to see whether or not there is a god.

What you have described are people that believe there is no God.
No, you're jumping to conclusions because you're not seeing the alternatives. It has more to do with promoting skepticism, than actually knowing the unknowable.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #33 on: July 26, 2009, 08:10:51 PM »
So they are forming a group for people that do not know whether or not there is a god? So I assume these groups would be doing work to see whether or not there is a god.

What you have described are people that believe there is no God.
No, you're jumping to conclusions because you're not seeing the alternatives. It has more to do with promoting skepticism, than actually knowing the unknowable.
Yup, I see idiotic groups as being idiotic. If they seriously were a group promoting skepticism they wouldn't be an "atheist" group. Forming a group of people that share only a disbelief in god is completely pointless. How long can you talk about not believing in god before you need a new topic?

?

Proleg

Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #34 on: July 26, 2009, 08:14:51 PM »
The slogan seems to be advertising more of a support group than anything. Kind of like "being a homosexual doesn't make you a bad person" (it does, but that's besides the point). Same deal.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #35 on: July 26, 2009, 08:20:24 PM »
If they are a support group then again it is another group catering to people that want to feel prosecuted. People need to grow a pair and stop trying to make de facto friends using their beliefs.

*

Soze

  • 1291
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Proponent
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #36 on: July 26, 2009, 08:21:41 PM »
Yup, I see idiotic groups as being idiotic. If they seriously were a group promoting skepticism they wouldn't be an "atheist" group.
Why not? Religion is the first and foremost contradicting force acting against science.

Quote
Forming a group of people that share only a disbelief in god is completely pointless.
The billboard isn't asking for meetings or get togethers. It is notifying people that it is alright to not believe.
Edit: These people will never meet, nor do they likely have any interest in meeting.

Quote
How long can you talk about not believing in god before you need a new topic?
If you think this is a derailment, feel free to split the thread into two topics.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2009, 08:38:19 PM by Soze »

?

Proleg

Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #37 on: July 26, 2009, 08:25:10 PM »
If they are a support group then again it is another group catering to people that want to feel prosecuted. People need to grow a pair and stop trying to make de facto friends using their beliefs.
Exactly what I tell suicidal queers.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #38 on: July 26, 2009, 08:33:36 PM »
If they are a support group then again it is another group catering to people that want to feel prosecuted. People need to grow a pair and stop trying to make de facto friends using their beliefs.
Exactly what I tell suicidal queers.

Settle down unless you want a ban proleg. That post crosses the line.

*

Pongo

  • 6752
  • +1/-0
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #39 on: July 27, 2009, 01:53:33 AM »
Why does it matter to them at all? I have never in my life cared whether someone believed in something or not. It in no way effects me, and if they are intelligent to decide something like that for themselves, they are probably intelligent enough to be religious in a reasonable manner.

Atheism has turned into a belief system.

Do you not care in the slightest that islamic extremists want to kill you?  Would you walk willingly into their company with the cavalier attitude of "I don't care what you believe, it in no way affects I me"?  I hope you get the opportunity to demonstrate this view for us in the near future.  

A rudimentary understanding of sociology would show you the importance of groups and an individual's need for acceptance.  You ignorance on the issue appears to be vast.

I would be willing to listen to your arguments of why you think atheism is a belief system, because by strict definition it applies.  However, I think that you are using it to imply that atheists hold some sort of "faith" in their beliefs.  Which, if true, strikes me as a very odd argument.

I don't see why having a meeting of atheists is pointless.  Like, I can't even think of a reason why anyone would find this distasteful unless they were working under feeble-minded prejudices.  What exactly scares you about a social gathering of people that agree on the same topic?  Is it because it's a tangible threat to your God-club?  If it's okay for people to have elitist, suppressive, brainwashing, lying, and socializing groups that believe in God, then I say it should be okay for people to have elitist, suppressive, brainwashing, lying, and socializing groups that do not believe in God.

You're letting your small brain be clouded by your preconceptions of atheism.  If you took a random sampling of atheists you would find many different degrees of them, from ones that know there are no gods to ones that think you can't prove it one way or the other.  The purpose of the billboard wasn't to gather a set of exactly like-minded people to sit around and believe a disbelief or try and disprove the existence of God (which is impossible), but to let people know that it's okay to not believe.

Quit wasting your God-given brain and use it before posting ignorant trite.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #40 on: July 27, 2009, 06:47:57 AM »
Why does it matter to them at all? I have never in my life cared whether someone believed in something or not. It in no way effects me, and if they are intelligent to decide something like that for themselves, they are probably intelligent enough to be religious in a reasonable manner.

Atheism has turned into a belief system.

Do you not care in the slightest that islamic extremists want to kill you?  Would you walk willingly into their company with the cavalier attitude of "I don't care what you believe, it in no way affects I me"?  I hope you get the opportunity to demonstrate this view for us in the near future.  

A rudimentary understanding of sociology would show you the importance of groups and an individual's need for acceptance.  You ignorance on the issue appears to be vast.
I understand this completely. Hence me pointing out that need in my post.
I would be willing to listen to your arguments of why you think atheism is a belief system, because by strict definition it applies.  However, I think that you are using it to imply that atheists hold some sort of "faith" in their beliefs.  Which, if true, strikes me as a very odd argument.
Of course not, I just think it's retarded to form a belief system around the single group that has no belief system. Belief systems cause a group to become unchangeable
I don't see why having a meeting of atheists is pointless. It's like a meeting for people that don't really like bananas. They have NOTHING in common except for the fact that they aren't religious. If the constant subject of their conversation is their lack of religion and how it affects their life it really is the most pathetic thing on Earth because they are letting religion control their lives and they aren't even religious. Do you not see the irony of a group that quits religion then forms a group to talk about how they no longer form groups to talk about religion? Like, I can't even think of a reason why anyone would find this distasteful unless they were working under feeble-minded prejudices.  What exactly scares you about a social gathering of people that agree on the same topic?  Is it because it's a tangible threat to your God-club?  If it's okay for people to have elitist, suppressive, brainwashing, lying, and socializing groups that believe in God, then I say it should be okay for people to have elitist, suppressive, brainwashing, lying, and socializing groups that do not believe in God.

You're letting your small brain be clouded by your preconceptions of atheism.  If you took a random sampling of atheists you would find many different degrees of them, from ones that know there are no gods to ones that think you can't prove it one way or the other.  The purpose of the billboard wasn't to gather a set of exactly like-minded people to sit around and believe a disbelief or try and disprove the existence of God (which is impossible), but to let people know that it's okay to not believe.

Quit wasting your God-given brain and use it before posting ignorant trite.

Now let me just put this out there, and listen to this.

If you quit a religion, become an atheist, why would you join a group to get together, to talk about how you are no longer religious and how its ok. It's the same bullshit most religious groups do, getting together to talk about how persecuted they are. So yes, I am small minded about groups that get together to have little BAWWW parties about how society doesn't accept them but they are right and they are the only one's that know it.

I'm not small minded about atheists or agnostic people, but I do question people that say there "is not a god" and claim they are on the scientifically backed side of the issue.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2009, 05:06:07 PM by Jack »

?

Jesus Crotch

  • 1250
  • +0/-0
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #41 on: July 27, 2009, 09:07:01 AM »
Why does it matter to them at all? I have never in my life cared whether someone believed in something or not. It in no way effects me, and if they are intelligent to decide something like that for themselves, they are probably intelligent enough to be religious in a reasonable manner.

Atheism has turned into a belief system.

Do you not care in the slightest that islamic extremists want to kill you?  Would you walk willingly into their company with the cavalier attitude of "I don't care what you believe, it in no way affects I me"?  I hope you get the opportunity to demonstrate this view for us in the near future.  

A rudimentary understanding of sociology would show you the importance of groups and an individual's need for acceptance.  You ignorance on the issue appears to be vast.
I understand this completely. Hence me pointing out that need in my post.
I would be willing to listen to your arguments of why you think atheism is a belief system, because by strict definition it applies.  However, I think that you are using it to imply that atheists hold some sort of "faith" in their beliefs.  Which, if true, strikes me as a very odd argument.
Of course not, I just think it's fucking retarded to form a belief system around the single group that has no belief system. Belief systems cause a group to become unchangeable
I don't see why having a meeting of atheists is pointless. It's like a meeting for people that don't really like bananas. They have NOTHING in common except for the fact that they aren't religious. If the constant subject of their conversation is their lack of religion and how it affects their life it really is the most pathetic thing on Earth because they are letting religion control their lives and they aren't even religious. Do you not see the irony of a group that quits religion then forms a group to talk about how they no longer form groups to talk about religion? Like, I can't even think of a reason why anyone would find this distasteful unless they were working under feeble-minded prejudices.  What exactly scares you about a social gathering of people that agree on the same topic?  Is it because it's a tangible threat to your God-club?  If it's okay for people to have elitist, suppressive, brainwashing, lying, and socializing groups that believe in God, then I say it should be okay for people to have elitist, suppressive, brainwashing, lying, and socializing groups that do not believe in God.

You're letting your small brain be clouded by your preconceptions of atheism.  If you took a random sampling of atheists you would find many different degrees of them, from ones that know there are no gods to ones that think you can't prove it one way or the other.  The purpose of the billboard wasn't to gather a set of exactly like-minded people to sit around and believe a disbelief or try and disprove the existence of God (which is impossible), but to let people know that it's okay to not believe.

Quit wasting your God-given brain and use it before posting ignorant trite.

Now let me just put this out there, and listen to this.

If you quit a religion, become an atheist, why would you join a group to get together, to talk about how you are no longer religious and how its ok. It's the same bullshit most religious groups do, getting together to talk about how persecuted they are. So yes, I am small minded about groups that get together to have little BAWWW parties about how society doesn't accept them but they are right and they are the only one's that know it.

I'm not small minded about atheists or agnostic people, but I do question people that say there "is not a god" and claim they are on the scientifically backed side of the issue.

OK, you're missing the whole point, Raist.  Atheists and freethinkers are having meetings and putting ads on buses in London and billboards all over because religion and religious people and organizations are screwing up our planet.  ID morons are trying to get their BS taught to our children in American schools.  The pope is telling starving people in third world countries they'll burn in hell if they wear condoms to stop spreading AIDS and making more children they can't feed.  Islamic fundamentalists are blowing people up all over the world, beheading apostates, and 'circumcising' women.

Most importantly, people everywhere are closing their eyes to truth, and refusing to accept the actual answers to some pretty important questions.  If you get rid of all the silly higher power nonsense, it's pretty hard to convince people that killing innocent civilians is OK.  Indoctrinate them into a religion, and it's a piece of cake.

Religion is a cancer, and those who recognize it are trying to help free the world of its influence.

If atheism is a belief system, clear is a color.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2009, 05:10:07 PM by Jack »
"An honest god is the noblest work of man. ... God has always resembled his creators. He hated and loved what they hated and loved and he was invariably found on the side of those in power." - Robert G. Ingersoll

http://theflatearthsociety.me

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #42 on: July 27, 2009, 11:27:20 AM »
Most importantly, people everywhere are closing their eyes to truth, and refusing to accept the actual answers to some pretty important questions.  If you get rid of all the silly higher power nonsense, it's pretty hard to convince people that killing innocent civilians is OK.  Indoctrinate them into a religion, and it's a piece of cake.

I see what you're saying here but I think it's kind of a nonsensical argument to use against religion in general.  You're equating the sweet grandma who has faith in God and goes to church every Sunday with radical terrorists and that's not fair.  Besides that, history has shown us that it simply isn't true.  There have been plenty of wars where innocent people have died that religion didn't even play a part in.  It can be a scapegoat, but sometimes that's all it is.  The Holocaust, one of the greatest exterminations of innocent civilians in history, was about national pride, not religion.  It doesn't take indoctrination into a religion to convince people to do crazy, twisted things, it simply takes a leader with an enormous amount of charisma.  You could eradicate religion from the face of the Earth and these people would still be running the world, and convincing people to do insane things.  They would find a way.

To say that religion is evil in and of itself because Islamic terrorists blow themselves up on a public bus is silly and absurd.

Quote
Religion is a cancer, and those who recognize it are trying to help free the world of its influence.

This is how modern atheism has become a belief system.  Under its most radical (and I might add charismatic) proponents it's gone well past simple non-belief and into the strong and radical belief that religion itself is evil and must be stopped.  Religion is attacked simply for existing.  Not only is that disgustingly intolerant, it's also rather politically retarded, and socially short-sighted.  In the end this brand of militant atheism is only creating a rift in society between believers and non-believers in which each side feels smugly superior to the other.  It's not helping anything.

Religion is flawed.  But so is capitalism.  So is socialism.  So is democracy.  Any large social construct of this kind is going to have its benefits and its flaws.  Religion is no different.  So if you're going to argue that religion itself is inherently evil and completely worthless you're going to have to demonstrate that it doesn't benefit society in any way.  I know a lot of sensible people who happen to be religious and aren't militant in any way who would disagree with that perspective.

As human beings we have the inherent right to believe what we want to believe, and relate to the world how we want to relate to it.  The militant atheists would like nothing better than to take that away.  Civilization in general has been moving to the point where different social groups who would have been at war with each other in the past are learning to live with each other, and it's almost like the militant atheists would like to destroy that progress, in the name of rationality.  It doesn't seem very rational to me.



As for my opinion of the billboard itself, it was put there to stir waves and cause trouble.  That much seems fairly obvious to me.  As much as I think it's a positive message in and of itself it still represents everything I hate about modern atheism.

Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

Pongo

  • 6752
  • +1/-0
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #43 on: July 27, 2009, 11:34:13 AM »
I stopped reading your post and was compelled to ask you if you really just said the Holocaust wasn't about religion?

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #44 on: July 27, 2009, 11:48:53 AM »
I stopped reading your post and was compelled to ask you if you really just said the Holocaust wasn't about religion?

Yes.  It wasn't about religion, it was about race.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #45 on: July 27, 2009, 12:01:04 PM »
I think Roundy puts this all quite well. And the Holocaust definitly wasn't about religion, Jews were spoiling the racial purity in Nazi Germany. If it was about religion the Nazis wouldn't have fought alongside Finnish Jews and given them Iron Crosses.
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #46 on: July 27, 2009, 12:23:45 PM »
Why does it matter to them at all? I have never in my life cared whether someone believed in something or not. It in no way effects me, and if they are intelligent to decide something like that for themselves, they are probably intelligent enough to be religious in a reasonable manner.

Atheism has turned into a belief system.

Do you not care in the slightest that islamic extremists want to kill you?  Would you walk willingly into their company with the cavalier attitude of "I don't care what you believe, it in no way affects I me"?  I hope you get the opportunity to demonstrate this view for us in the near future.  

A rudimentary understanding of sociology would show you the importance of groups and an individual's need for acceptance.  You ignorance on the issue appears to be vast.
I understand this completely. Hence me pointing out that need in my post.
I would be willing to listen to your arguments of why you think atheism is a belief system, because by strict definition it applies.  However, I think that you are using it to imply that atheists hold some sort of "faith" in their beliefs.  Which, if true, strikes me as a very odd argument.
Of course not, I just think it's fucking retarded to form a belief system around the single group that has no belief system. Belief systems cause a group to become unchangeable
I don't see why having a meeting of atheists is pointless. It's like a meeting for people that don't really like bananas. They have NOTHING in common except for the fact that they aren't religious. If the constant subject of their conversation is their lack of religion and how it affects their life it really is the most pathetic thing on Earth because they are letting religion control their lives and they aren't even religious. Do you not see the irony of a group that quits religion then forms a group to talk about how they no longer form groups to talk about religion? Like, I can't even think of a reason why anyone would find this distasteful unless they were working under feeble-minded prejudices.  What exactly scares you about a social gathering of people that agree on the same topic?  Is it because it's a tangible threat to your God-club?  If it's okay for people to have elitist, suppressive, brainwashing, lying, and socializing groups that believe in God, then I say it should be okay for people to have elitist, suppressive, brainwashing, lying, and socializing groups that do not believe in God.

You're letting your small brain be clouded by your preconceptions of atheism.  If you took a random sampling of atheists you would find many different degrees of them, from ones that know there are no gods to ones that think you can't prove it one way or the other.  The purpose of the billboard wasn't to gather a set of exactly like-minded people to sit around and believe a disbelief or try and disprove the existence of God (which is impossible), but to let people know that it's okay to not believe.

Quit wasting your God-given brain and use it before posting ignorant trite.

Now let me just put this out there, and listen to this.

If you quit a religion, become an atheist, why in the flying fuck would you join a group to get together, to talk about how you are no longer religious and how its ok. It's the same bullshit most religious groups do, getting together to talk about how persecuted they are. So yes, I am small minded about groups that get together to have little BAWWW parties about how society doesn't accept them but they are right and they are the only one's that know it.

I'm not small minded about atheists or agnostic people, but I do question people that say there "is not a god" and claim they are on the scientifically backed side of the issue.

OK, you're missing the whole point, Raist.  Atheists and freethinkers are having meetings and putting ads on buses in London and billboards all over because religion and religious people and organizations are fucking up our planet.  ID morons are trying to get their BS taught to our children in American schools.  The pope is telling starving people in third world countries they'll burn in hell if they wear condoms to stop spreading AIDS and making more children they can't feed.  Islamic fundamentalists are blowing people up all over the world, beheading apostates, and 'circumcising' women.

Most importantly, people everywhere are closing their eyes to truth, and refusing to accept the actual answers to some pretty important questions.  If you get rid of all the silly higher power nonsense, it's pretty hard to convince people that killing innocent civilians is OK.  Indoctrinate them into a religion, and it's a piece of cake.

Religion is a cancer, and those who recognize it are trying to help free the world of its influence.

If atheism is a belief system, clear is a color.

That pretty much proves my "atheism is a belief system statement"

As for your "religious people are destroying the planet." That is incorrect. Politicians have worked to manipulate religious groups into taking stupid positions, just like politicians have manipulated everyone else into taking positions. If you really want to start a group based on saving the world, base it on something other than lack of religion.

The second you base it off of atheism you lose every intelligent christian and every intelligent religious person on Earth. It was thinking like yours that drove Einstein out of nazi germany and into america. Any group whose mission is to save the world, should not base itself on a divisive issue. Especially one that has literally nothing to do with their objective.

These groups will literally accomplish nothing because they can not unite people, they can only divide them, that is why I call them a retarded idea. You might as well start a global peace group around the KKK. Let us say you'll "offend a few potential members"
« Last Edit: July 27, 2009, 05:06:43 PM by Jack »

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #47 on: July 27, 2009, 12:26:44 PM »
These groups will literally accomplish nothing because they can not unite people, they can only divide them, that is why I call them a fucking retarded idea.

Amen.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

?

Jesus Crotch

  • 1250
  • +0/-0
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #48 on: July 27, 2009, 06:04:14 PM »
Most importantly, people everywhere are closing their eyes to truth, and refusing to accept the actual answers to some pretty important questions.  If you get rid of all the silly higher power nonsense, it's pretty hard to convince people that killing innocent civilians is OK.  Indoctrinate them into a religion, and it's a piece of cake.

I see what you're saying here but I think it's kind of a nonsensical argument to use against religion in general.  You're equating the sweet grandma who has faith in God and goes to church every Sunday with radical terrorists and that's not fair.  Besides that, history has shown us that it simply isn't true.  There have been plenty of wars where innocent people have died that religion didn't even play a part in.  It can be a scapegoat, but sometimes that's all it is.  The Holocaust, one of the greatest exterminations of innocent civilians in history, was about national pride, not religion.  It doesn't take indoctrination into a religion to convince people to do crazy, twisted things, it simply takes a leader with an enormous amount of charisma.  You could eradicate religion from the face of the Earth and these people would still be running the world, and convincing people to do insane things.  They would find a way.

To say that religion is evil in and of itself because Islamic terrorists blow themselves up on a public bus is silly and absurd.


Actually, what I'm saying is beyond that.  The sweet grandma, through her very sweetness and almost certain voting, gives both emotional and electoral legitimacy to the entire religious farce.  She, and the 'mainstream' members of religion provide the front organization for the corrupt, evil nonsense perpetrated by the 'extremists'.  The point is, without religion, there can be no religious extremists, and the choice is a no-brainer to me.

LOL at the argument that not ALL conflicts and atrocities have had religion at their root - even if it were true, which it isn't, who cares?  Even if just one of the disgusting, horrific conflicts over whose imaginary friend is cooler could have been avoided, it would outweigh the sum of religion's positive contributions to society.  And the unavoidable truth is that without christianity and islam, there are no Crusades (20 million people killed in the first one alone, all in the name of god, on both sides).  Without christianity, there would have been no Inquisition (12 million plus killed, most for being intellectuals).

And if you think Holocaust wasn't religious, you don't know jack about WWII or Hitler.  Despite what christians try to claim based on a couple of quotes, Hitler wasn't just religious, he was a religious nut obsessed with both judeo-christian and occult texts and relics.  Let's not forget, he was eradicating catholics, too.  Was that about race?



Quote
Religion is a cancer, and those who recognize it are trying to help free the world of its influence.

This is how modern atheism has become a belief system.  Under its most radical (and I might add charismatic) proponents it's gone well past simple non-belief and into the strong and radical belief that religion itself is evil and must be stopped.  Religion is attacked simply for existing.  Not only is that disgustingly intolerant, it's also rather politically retarded, and socially short-sighted.  In the end this brand of militant atheism is only creating a rift in society between believers and non-believers in which each side feels smugly superior to the other.  It's not helping anything.

Religion is flawed.  But so is capitalism.  So is socialism.  So is democracy.  Any large social construct of this kind is going to have its benefits and its flaws.  Religion is no different.  So if you're going to argue that religion itself is inherently evil and completely worthless you're going to have to demonstrate that it doesn't benefit society in any way.  I know a lot of sensible people who happen to be religious and aren't militant in any way who would disagree with that perspective.

As human beings we have the inherent right to believe what we want to believe, and relate to the world how we want to relate to it.  The militant atheists would like nothing better than to take that away.  Civilization in general has been moving to the point where different social groups who would have been at war with each other in the past are learning to live with each other, and it's almost like the militant atheists would like to destroy that progress, in the name of rationality.  It doesn't seem very rational to me.



As for my opinion of the billboard itself, it was put there to stir waves and cause trouble.  That much seems fairly obvious to me.  As much as I think it's a positive message in and of itself it still represents everything I hate about modern atheism.



Again, if atheism is a belief system, clear is a color.

I don't believe religion has been and is a force of domination, prejudice, subjugation, and taxation for the past 5,000 years, I know this fact from studying history.  This isn't some leap of atheistic 'faith', it's just the only conclusion that can be drawn from an examination of the histories of the world's major religions if one's judgment is not clouded by beliefs.  I don't attack religion for existing, or even for what I think it might do; I attack it for what it has done, is doing, and proudly promises to keep doing until all of us heathens are saved.  Evangelistic religions have declared war on rational thought and independent examination of one's spiritual options all over the world because by their very nature, they are discriminatory, divisive, and oppressive.

It's not a matter of whether religion benefits society in ANY way.  Cancer kills child molesters, which clearly benefits society, are you going to advocate for the abolition of cancer research?  Religion has poisoned the minds of billions of people for thousands of years - it has retarded progress both socially and technologically.  It has divided families, destroyed nations, killed millions upon millions, and made a very few very rich and very powerful.  If you ever are able to take the 'god is real' goggles off long enough to get true clarity on the subject, you will feel guilty for having even once spoken out in its defense.

I would have no problem letting religious morons have their silly rituals and pay their silly tithes, except they won't stop trying to take over the world and ruin it for people who actually think about the reality of our existence.  Tell you what, as soon as there are no more islamic terrorists, fundamentalist presidents keeping us from moving forward on stem cell research, attempts to promote ID as some sort of scientific concept to children, and nuns telling AIDS patients they claim to want to help they shouldn't wear condoms - and  all the other disgusting, revolting, horrific crap done in the name of god or gods on the planet... when all that has been completely eradicated, I'll stop advocating for the forced sterilization of the devout.

That pretty much proves my "atheism is a belief system statement"

As for your "religious people are destroying the planet." That is incorrect. Politicians have worked to manipulate religious groups into taking stupid positions, just like politicians have manipulated everyone else into taking positions. If you really want to start a group based on saving the world, base it on something other than lack of religion.

LOLWUT?  Half of religious nutcases I'm afraid of ARE the politicians.  Are you talking about the Pope?  You don't really think he believes any of this bible bullshit, do you?  He's a politician, even more so than Dubyah and Palin.

The second you base it off of atheism you lose every intelligent christian and every intelligent religious person on Earth. It was thinking like yours that drove Einstein out of nazi germany and into america. Any group whose mission is to save the world, should not base itself on a divisive issue. Especially one that has literally nothing to do with their objective.

OK, so a couple of dozen smart people get left behind.  So what?  That's like worrying about there being a good lawyer in heaven!  I'll take 1 moderately intelligent atheist on my side fighting for reason and progress for 10 'intelligent christians' praying against me.  Make it a thousand pray-ers.  you have seen the statistics, right?  There is an easily plotted, inversely proportional relationship between IQ and depth of religious belief.  If we have 10% of the population, we've got at least 75% of the IQ points.  Sorry if that seems arrogant or whatever, it's just statistical probability.

These groups will literally accomplish nothing because they can not unite people, they can only divide them, that is why I call them a retarded idea. You might as well start a global peace group around the KKK. Let us say you'll "offend a few potential members"

Hmmm.  This makes no sense to me at all.  The only people we're looking to unite are ourselves, and we're doing that at a pretty amazing rate.  The money the 'Atheist Bus Campaign' hoped to raise in six months, it raised in 24 hours, and the largest of the atheist organizations I belong to has over 3 million members, and has sponsored summer camps for kids, marches on Washington, and my local affiliate is working to have the 'invocations' abolished at the council meetings of several cities near me.  It is estimated that more atheists voted in the critical swing states than the margin between McCain and Obama in those states, and how many atheists do you really think voted for Palin to be one heart attack away from 'the button'?

It seems to me that we're starting to accomplish things all over, and with a new atheism-inspired book on the bestseller list every 8-10 months, more freethinkers keep finding something to get passionate about every day.

Our founders knew that religion was an antiquated concept when they wrote the Constitution, that's why there's no mention of god or gods anywhere in it, and why the first is the first and not the fourth or seventh - they knew how important that shit was.  It's even more antiquated now, but we keep allowing children to be abused through indoctrination, doomed to a life full of lies, silly superstitious beliefs, and fear of a made-up hell.  I'm over it, and trying to do what I can to get people to take the blinders off, for the good of us all, and before it's too late, and one of these pissing matches gets out of hand.
"An honest god is the noblest work of man. ... God has always resembled his creators. He hated and loved what they hated and loved and he was invariably found on the side of those in power." - Robert G. Ingersoll

http://theflatearthsociety.me

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #49 on: July 27, 2009, 06:10:47 PM »
I only skimmed that, but you have some serious deep seated issues with religion.

As for the rest, believe what you will, but it has become a belief system.

Extremism in all forms is evil, from the religious extremists that cause the wrongs you paint all religious people with, to the eco terrorists that blow up buildings and kill people for no other reason than "it's 'right.'" Your extremism is just as bad as the people praying for the death of soldiers, it is the misguided black and white hate that we see in every republican.

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #50 on: July 27, 2009, 06:16:30 PM »
Quote
If you ever are able to take the 'god is real' goggles off long enough to get true clarity on the subject, you will feel guilty for having even once spoken out in its defense.

Er Roundy isn't wearing any god is real goggles...
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #51 on: July 27, 2009, 07:07:18 PM »
Actually, what I'm saying is beyond that.  The sweet grandma, through her very sweetness and almost certain voting, gives both emotional and electoral legitimacy to the entire religious farce.  She, and the 'mainstream' members of religion provide the front organization for the corrupt, evil nonsense perpetrated by the 'extremists'.  The point is, without religion, there can be no religious extremists, and the choice is a no-brainer to me.

The point is, even without religion there would still be dangerous extremists, and if they didn't have religion as a scapegoat they would find something else to hang their arguments on.

Quote
LOL at the argument that not ALL conflicts and atrocities have had religion at their root - even if it were true, which it isn't, who cares?

You've got to be kidding me.  You really think that all conflicts have had religion at their root?  Funny, and I thought war was mostly about exercising power.  If anything religion is just a scapegoat in most conflicts.

Quote
Even if just one of the disgusting, horrific conflicts over whose imaginary friend is cooler could have been avoided, it would outweigh the sum of religion's positive contributions to society.  And the unavoidable truth is that without christianity and islam, there are no Crusades (20 million people killed in the first one alone, all in the name of god, on both sides).  Without christianity, there would have been no Inquisition (12 million plus killed, most for being intellectuals).

Without religion, the extremists at the front of these movements would have found another reason to exercise their despotism.  It is naive to think that we wouldn't have had such dark periods in history if there had been no religion.

Quote
And if you think Holocaust wasn't religious, you don't know jack about WWII or Hitler.  Despite what christians try to claim based on a couple of quotes, Hitler wasn't just religious, he was a religious nut obsessed with both judeo-christian and occult texts and relics.  Let's not forget, he was eradicating catholics, too.  Was that about race?

Whether Hitler was religious or not is irrelevant.  The central goal of the Holocaust was the preservation of the Aryan race.  Perhaps you should do some research into the subject if you believe otherwise.

Quote
Again, if atheism is a belief system, clear is a color.

You seem to have misunderstood what I said.  I never said that lack of belief in God itself is a belief system.  It's when you use it as an excuse to persecute those who disagree with you that it becomes dangerously dogmatic.  Sadly, that's how people see atheism these days, thanks to charismatic speakers and writers like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, and people like you who spout their dogma as if it was absolute truth and not what it is: a subjective opinion.

Quote
I don't believe religion has been and is a force of domination, prejudice, subjugation, and taxation for the past 5,000 years, I know this fact from studying history.  This isn't some leap of atheistic 'faith', it's just the only conclusion that can be drawn from an examination of the histories of the world's major religions if one's judgment is not clouded by beliefs.  I don't attack religion for existing, or even for what I think it might do; I attack it for what it has done, is doing, and proudly promises to keep doing until all of us heathens are saved.  Evangelistic religions have declared war on rational thought and independent examination of one's spiritual options all over the world because by their very nature, they are discriminatory, divisive, and oppressive.

Right, bad things have come from religion, as they have from every largely-held ideological position in human history.  Good things have come from it too and that's what you seem to be ignoring.  Somehow we've managed to get past slavery, for example, despite the majority of people being religious.  You can't hold an entire group of belief systems accountable for the actions of a minority of practitioners.

Quote
It's not a matter of whether religion benefits society in ANY way.  Cancer kills child molesters, which clearly benefits society, are you going to advocate for the abolition of cancer research?

That's the most ridiculous argument I've ever heard.

Quote
Religion has poisoned the minds of billions of people for thousands of years - it has retarded progress both socially and technologically.  It has divided families, destroyed nations, killed millions upon millions, and made a very few very rich and very powerful.  If you ever are able to take the 'god is real' goggles off long enough to get true clarity on the subject, you will feel guilty for having even once spoken out in its defense.

Um, first of all, I'm agnostic, and I was brought up by an atheist and an agnostic.  Believe me, I'm not wearing any "God is real" goggles.  ::)

I just wish you'd drop the "Dawkins is infallible" goggles.  Ironic that you're trying to argue that atheism isn't a belief system and all you're really doing in defense of your position is spouting his rhetoric.

Religion, itself, did not do any of those things.  People practicing religion have done them, and as I pointed out, such people are the minority.  To say that religion in its entirety should be completely eradicated because of the actions of the minority is a bit like saying that all black people should be in jail because a lot of them shoot each other and deal drugs.

Your first line, "Religion has poisoned the minds of billions of people for thousands of years", really, sums up your position adequately.  You think that simply the fact that people believe in God is a negative result of religion.  It's rather outlandish.  There are still things that science can't answer, and there are things that science will likely never be able to answer.  If religion gives some people comfort over such issues, how can it be a bad thing in and of itself?  Because it's not rational?  Is it your opinion that a belief system must be rational to do good?  I'd like to see that position supported.

Besides, maybe the fact that religion has retarded technological progress is a good thing.  Just look at what technology has done to the world the past two centuries.

Quote
I would have no problem letting religious morons have their silly rituals and pay their silly tithes, except they won't stop trying to take over the world and ruin it for people who actually think about the reality of our existence.  Tell you what, as soon as there are no more islamic terrorists, fundamentalist presidents keeping us from moving forward on stem cell research, attempts to promote ID as some sort of scientific concept to children, and nuns telling AIDS patients they claim to want to help they shouldn't wear condoms - and  all the other disgusting, revolting, horrific crap done in the name of god or gods on the planet... when all that has been completely eradicated, I'll stop advocating for the forced sterilization of the devout.

This is the thing; not all religious people are trying to take over the world, and not all are forcing their dangerous opinions on others.  If you want to go to war with religion, do it with the fundamentalists and extremists.  Leave the poor people who are just trying to lead spiritual lives alone.  There's nothing inherently wrong with it.

You can also blame the democratic system itself for some of these things as much as religion.  Perhaps you should renounce your Canadian citizenship and go live in a cabin in Nunavit, lest you look like a hypocrite.

The final line in this part of your post is the reason why you're never going to make any progress.  Like I said earlier, such an attitude is just politically retarded.  You're not going to convince people they're wrong by alienating them.  I would say that such a position does more damage to the atheist movement than help, and you're far from alone in your position.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #52 on: July 27, 2009, 07:18:31 PM »
If we are going to blatantly throw around Hitler references here's one, Hitler began excluding jews from his political party (the race not the religion, though either way he was not religious.) and then he started saying that they were inferior and their very existence was ruining society, and the cause of all of its ills. Please don't act like hitler the next time you are going to compare religion to him.

?

Jesus Crotch

  • 1250
  • +0/-0
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #53 on: July 27, 2009, 08:17:02 PM »
Roundy, you can't sidestep the evil that religion has manifested on this planet by saying that the acts of an institution would inevitably have been committed by some secular force - that's just nonsense.  It's like saying America doesn't owe anything to the native population, because someone would have come along and destroyed them if we hadn't.  The point that I made quite clearly was that it doesn't matter if there would have been SOME 'dark periods' as you called them (how many dead does it take before it warrants the title 'atrocity'?  I guess more than 20 million.), there wouldn't have been THOSE 'dark periods'.  How can you possibly try to argue that religion has done enough good to offset the senseless, violent deaths of 200 million people, only about 5-7% of which were military combatants?

Of what good, precisely, are you speaking?  The lead-joined aqueducts the Holy Roman Empire brought to Europe, which scientists believe caused mild brain damage to millions for a thousand years?  Or was it the invention of the Rack, the trial by ordeal, and the Star Chamber?  Maybe it was that deity-sanctioned slavery?  Seriously, what good has religion brought to this world?

Also, I'm pretty sure I've got a bit more research into WWII and the Holocaust than you.  The preservation of the Aryan race was the primary justification used in propaganda to bring the population on board with the initial separation of the jews into the ghettos and eventually into the camps.  Anti-semitism was prevalent in Germany at the time and convenient to the NAZI party.  Goebbels and Hitler blamed all of Europe's problems of the time (which were actually caused by the US and UK) on the Jews, and convinced the German people to do the same.  They blamed the war itself on the Jews, as if they were the ones driving tanks into Poland. 

The point is this:  He chose as the symbol of his party the swastika, which he became fascinated with as part of the coat of arms of the monastery school he attended, and he wanted more than anything in the world to be a priest.  He believed wholeheartedly in the jewish myths, the occult, and god.  He fought the Jews, in his own words, "fighting for the work of the Lord."  His hatred may have been inspired by sociology and politics, but his belief that he could exterminate innocent civilians already subjected to the most cruel slavery and torture the world has ever seen came straight from his belief in his imaginary friend. 

Oh, and sorry to lump you in with the delusional, that was my mistake.

If we are going to blatantly throw around Hitler references here's one, Hitler began excluding jews from his political party (the race not the religion, though either way he was not religious.) and then he started saying that they were inferior and their very existence was ruining society, and the cause of all of its ills. Please don't act like hitler the next time you are going to compare religion to him.

What?  I didn't bring up Hitler, and I certainly didn't compare him to anyone as an argument.  Also, what the hell are you talking about?  Hitler started hating on Jews in Vienna in the early '20s, at the latest, long before he had anything to do with any political party.
"An honest god is the noblest work of man. ... God has always resembled his creators. He hated and loved what they hated and loved and he was invariably found on the side of those in power." - Robert G. Ingersoll

http://theflatearthsociety.me

*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13115
  • +0/-0
  • swiggity swooty
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #54 on: July 27, 2009, 08:22:42 PM »
I often wonder what the future may hold as far as religion is concerned. Everyday, more and more advancements in scientific research are made. It's ever changing and evolving and expanding. Religion cannot, in my eyes, possibly keep up. Most texts were written thousands of years ago, and never originally planned for the things we now have in our lives to exist (although some may claim the texts supposedly predict such things, but I don't buy into it).

One can only wonder if religion will become dead as a whole in the future just as Roman, Egyptian and Greek mythology has become.

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #55 on: July 27, 2009, 09:56:59 PM »
Roundy, you can't sidestep the evil that religion has manifested on this planet by saying that the acts of an institution would inevitably have been committed by some secular force - that's just nonsense.  It's like saying America doesn't owe anything to the native population, because someone would have come along and destroyed them if we hadn't.  The point that I made quite clearly was that it doesn't matter if there would have been SOME 'dark periods' as you called them (how many dead does it take before it warrants the title 'atrocity'?  I guess more than 20 million.), there wouldn't have been THOSE 'dark periods'.  How can you possibly try to argue that religion has done enough good to offset the senseless, violent deaths of 200 million people, only about 5-7% of which were military combatants?

Of what good, precisely, are you speaking?  The lead-joined aqueducts the Holy Roman Empire brought to Europe, which scientists believe caused mild brain damage to millions for a thousand years?  Or was it the invention of the Rack, the trial by ordeal, and the Star Chamber?  Maybe it was that deity-sanctioned slavery?  Seriously, what good has religion brought to this world?

Well, in general, religion provides comfort for many who need it, provides many with a sense of purpose, and helps people get over their fear of death.  In my opinion, those are good things, and they've literally affected billions of people.  Christianity helped catalyze the civil rights movement (remember Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr?) and is responsible for many hospitals (they won't give you an abortion but they won't turn you away for not taking Christ into your bosom) and charitable institutions, worldwide.  The medieval Muslims were very scholarly people, who gave us significant advances in science, mathematics, medicine, and astronomy; they were key in developing the scientific method and revolutionized optics, and gave the world hospitals and libraries.  For that matter, many of the significant scientific advances during the Enlightenment period were made by devout Christians.

Quote
Also, I'm pretty sure I've got a bit more research into WWII and the Holocaust than you.

How arrogant of you to say.  I'm sure you make that assumption about everything you argue, with whomever you're arguing.

Quote
The preservation of the Aryan race was the primary justification used in propaganda to bring the population on board with the initial separation of the jews into the ghettos and eventually into the camps.  Anti-semitism was prevalent in Germany at the time and convenient to the NAZI party.  Goebbels and Hitler blamed all of Europe's problems of the time (which were actually caused by the US and UK) on the Jews, and convinced the German people to do the same.  They blamed the war itself on the Jews, as if they were the ones driving tanks into Poland. 

The point is this:  He chose as the symbol of his party the swastika, which he became fascinated with as part of the coat of arms of the monastery school he attended, and he wanted more than anything in the world to be a priest.  He believed wholeheartedly in the jewish myths, the occult, and god.  He fought the Jews, in his own words, "fighting for the work of the Lord."  His hatred may have been inspired by sociology and politics, but his belief that he could exterminate innocent civilians already subjected to the most cruel slavery and torture the world has ever seen came straight from his belief in his imaginary friend.

Well however you want to spin it you can blame nationalism for the atrocities committed during the Holocaust more than religion.  Clearly you agree that it was racial motives that galvanized the Germans to support Hitler over anything else, which was what gave him the power he had to do what he did.  Psychosis isn't peculiar to the religious so the idea that he wouldn't have felt justified, in his own mind, for exterminating the Jews is doubtful, in my opinion, and at any rate only something about which we can speculate since we don't know how Hitler would have turned out if he hadn't been influenced in his thinking by religion.

I agree that the religious have been behind many atrocities throughout history, and that they justified their acts with religion, but being power-mad despots, I have a feeling they would have committed their atrocities whether they were religious or not, assuming they would have been able to gain power without religion.  It's been a tool used by those who were (and are) evil, to be sure.  But in the end, I'm pretty sure that's all it is, a tool.  I don't remember ever reading a chapter in the Bible that advocated the extermination of non-believers (if you know of one, please tell me, it would be interesting to see), at least by humans (God, evidently, can do whatever he wants).  I think it's ultimately not religion itself that is at the root of evil, but rather perversion of it, and at any rate the primary motive is generally political.

Quote
Oh, and sorry to lump you in with the delusional, that was my mistake.

No problem, but seriously, lurk moar.  ;D
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

?

Jesus Crotch

  • 1250
  • +0/-0
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #56 on: July 28, 2009, 12:07:09 AM »

Well, in general, religion provides comfort for many who need it, provides many with a sense of purpose, and helps people get over their fear of death.  In my opinion, those are good things, and they've literally affected billions of people.  Christianity helped catalyze the civil rights movement (remember Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr?) and is responsible for many hospitals (they won't give you an abortion but they won't turn you away for not taking Christ into your bosom) and charitable institutions, worldwide.  The medieval Muslims were very scholarly people, who gave us significant advances in science, mathematics, medicine, and astronomy; they were key in developing the scientific method and revolutionized optics, and gave the world hospitals and libraries.  For that matter, many of the significant scientific advances during the Enlightenment period were made by devout Christians.

What I see is that the comfort comes at the cost of a lifetime of guilt for the actions of a character in a 5000 year old fairy tale, and for not following rules designed to control.  While it did help spread the message during the civil rights movement, it was also the primary justification for the enslavement of the African people, and the colonization and subsequent redivision and rape of their continent.  Most of the hospitals are funded by the church, but those funds are swindled from the pockets of the congregation to begin with.  Wherever you look, you find any small positives that come from the religion itself outweighed by the negatives, often the very ones attached by dogma to the good deeds, like Mother Theresa withholding pain medication from terminally ill homosexuals in India to help them 'make the right choice' and denounce their evil ways.  The best minds of the time are going to advance science, whether consumed by belief or playing along, there just won't be as much advancement as there would be were they unrestricted by dogma - they don't need to be afraid to find an equal number of ribs on men and women, or that the sun does not, in fact, orbit the earth.

Quote
Also, I'm pretty sure I've got a bit more research into WWII and the Holocaust than you.

How arrogant of you to say.  I'm sure you make that assumption about everything you argue, with whomever you're arguing.


No, just when I've studied a subject that doesn't get studied a whole lot, and fairly exhaustively.  I'm a Jew adopted by catholics, and was encouraged to explore my genetic roots.  I've met and talked with holocaust survivors, watches all 9 hours or whatever it is of Shoah, did a huge paper on that, Took a two part course in college, The Great World Wars, put on by the History and Political Science departments...  If I might be wrong, and you want to compare Holocaust research schlong lengths, we should probably do it in PM, my list of references is a couple of pages long.

And you know damn well I've only played that card about this subject and comparative religions, as that was my major.  You lurk plenty.

Well however you want to spin it you can blame nationalism for the atrocities committed during the Holocaust more than religion.  Clearly you agree that it was racial motives that galvanized the Germans to support Hitler over anything else, which was what gave him the power he had to do what he did.  Psychosis isn't peculiar to the religious so the idea that he wouldn't have felt justified, in his own mind, for exterminating the Jews is doubtful, in my opinion, and at any rate only something about which we can speculate since we don't know how Hitler would have turned out if he hadn't been influenced in his thinking by religion.

I agree that the religious have been behind many atrocities throughout history, and that they justified their acts with religion, but being power-mad despots, I have a feeling they would have committed their atrocities whether they were religious or not, assuming they would have been able to gain power without religion.  It's been a tool used by those who were (and are) evil, to be sure.  But in the end, I'm pretty sure that's all it is, a tool.  I don't remember ever reading a chapter in the Bible that advocated the extermination of non-believers (if you know of one, please tell me, it would be interesting to see), at least by humans (God, evidently, can do whatever he wants).  I think it's ultimately not religion itself that is at the root of evil, but rather perversion of it, and at any rate the primary motive is generally political.

OK, let me come at this a different way:  Religion tells its believers that they have the answers, and that any answers they don't have, they need only to read the bible, or the koran, or talk to this wise man or that oracle, and you will know what you need to know.  It teaches you at a very young age that actual thought about what you are being force fed is not beneficial to your eternal soul at all - it has to, the story it asks us to swallow is a funny pill, indeed.  It teaches people to ignore ludicrous contradictions like the bible tracing Jesus' lineage to King David through Joseph.  If you can ignore that your infallible book, written by god himself, says that either Mary wasn't a virgin, or that Jesus isn't related to David (and therefore not the prophesied messiah), and still believe in Christ the savior and the virgin Mary, you're willing to suspend reason.

Also consider Penn's child killer/atheist (or heretic, at least) gambit.  If god tells a religious person to kill their baby, they either choose not to, which means they don't really believe all that 'god is perfect and all-loving' stuff, or they choose to obey, which means they're insane and dangerous and need to get the hell away from me.

As for the bible advocating genocide:

Deuteronomy 7:2 says, "And when the Lord your God gives them over to you, and you defeat them; then you must utterly destroy them; you shall make no covenant with them, and show no mercy to them."

God gave a whole boatload of tribal nations over to his chosen marauding, pillaging people.

Joshua 10:40 states, "So Joshua smote the whole land; he left none remaining, but utterly destroyed all that breathed, as the Lord God of Israel commanded."

I can't remember the one where he tells the Jews to sew salt into the enemy's land AFTER they kill all the men and children, and rape all the women to completely mix the next generation.  Deuteronomy and Numbers are full of lovely commands by god to, "March on Christian So-o-o-ol-dier..." and just how much violence they were to inflict on the goyim for having the audacity to be living in the promised land, or even nearby.

"An honest god is the noblest work of man. ... God has always resembled his creators. He hated and loved what they hated and loved and he was invariably found on the side of those in power." - Robert G. Ingersoll

http://theflatearthsociety.me

*

Euclid

  • 942
  • +1/-0
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #57 on: July 28, 2009, 12:12:09 AM »
Quote
I don't remember ever reading a chapter in the Bible that advocated the extermination of non-believers (if you know of one, please tell me, it would be interesting to see), at least by humans (God, evidently, can do whatever he wants).

Samuel 15:2-3

"Thus says the LORD of hosts, 'I will punish the Amalekites for what they did in opposing the Israelites when they came up out of Egypt. Now go and attack Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have; do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.'"

Yes, this refers to the extermination of a specific people from the Old Testament (and it is supposed to be spoken by God himself).  I'm sure many could construe this to justify genocide in whatever situation suited them.  However, there is no text which outright calls for the extermination of all nonbelievers (excluding mention of hell of course.)
« Last Edit: July 28, 2009, 12:14:19 AM by Euclid »
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist
Yes, thanks to the tireless efforts of Euclid and a few other mathematically-inclined members, electromagnetic acceleration is fast moving into the forefront of FE research.
8)

*

Pongo

  • 6752
  • +1/-0
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #58 on: July 28, 2009, 12:27:50 AM »
The bible is full of commandments to kill people.   Here is my favorite.  

If your very own brother, or your son or daughter, or the wife you love, or your closest friend secretly entices you, saying, "Let us go and worship other gods" (gods that neither you nor your fathers have known, gods of the peoples around you, whether near or far, from one end of the land to the other), do not yield to him or listen to him. Show him no pity. Do not spare him or shield him. You must certainly put him to death. Your hand must be the first in putting him to death, and then the hands of all the people. Stone him to death, because he tried to turn you away from the LORD your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. Then all Israel will hear and be afraid, and no one among you will do such an evil thing again.

Deuteronomy 13:6-10


The reason that you don't remember ever reading them is because no one reads the bible (though I have very rarely met a christian that does not swear that they have) and because the people that teach you about such things conveniently glaze over those parts.
« Last Edit: July 28, 2009, 12:30:38 AM by Pongo »

?

Daz555

  • 165
  • +0/-0
Re: atheism billboard
« Reply #59 on: July 28, 2009, 03:00:05 AM »
This is how modern atheism has become a belief system.  Under its most radical (and I might add charismatic) proponents it's gone well past simple non-belief and into the strong and radical belief that religion itself is evil and must be stopped.  Religion is attacked simply for existing.  Not only is that disgustingly intolerant, it's also rather politically retarded, and socially short-sighted.  In the end this brand of militant atheism is only creating a rift in society between believers and non-believers in which each side feels smugly superior to the other.  It's not helping anything.
What you describe there is anti-theism, not athiesm.