JACK AND THE BEANSTALK




Jack and the Beanstalk is not a fairy tale. It really happened. There were giant trees whose height reached for more than six miles, all the way to the first dome.
https://secretenergy.com/are-these-giant-prehistoric-trees/https://eden-saga.com/en/gigantic-trees.htmlThere are other instances where huge areas of the surface of the Earth were leveled precisely.
https://www.ancient-code.com/the-mysterious-flattened-mountaintop-of-monte-alban-and-its-ancient-pyramid-city/Monte Alban is a mountain where its top seems to have been literally cut off and leveled, to make an extremely flat tabletop mountain.
What sort of technology was used? Its builders managed somehow to flatten an area the size of more than 50 football fields, resulting in a massive plateau, eerily similar to the one found in Giza, Egypt.
Like Machu Picchu in Peru, the locals leveled an entire mountaintop to build this complex, without the use of the wheel, iron tools or pack animals.
The question that no one seems to be asking is what kind of technology was used to cut the giant trees as well as to level a whole mountain top. There is only one answer: ball lightning technology (activation of the first state of ether in objects).
The Beatles series continues:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1276587#msg1276587 (Surfs Up from the Smile album, and much more)
-------------------------------------------------------------
https://kachina2012.wordpress.com/2009/02/11/ka-and-chirality-and-chiram-abiff/ (comments: Geomagnetic
Polarity Reversal: A Theoretical Modus Operandi of
Punctuated Equilibrium Evolution
By Jay A. Yoder)
DNA mutation geomagnetic pole reversal
Discontinuities in the fossil record provide the basis
for the evolutionary theory of punctuated-equilibrium
proposed by Eldredge and Gould (1972). Their theory
suggests that the production of new species (as evidence
of evolution) occurs by rapid bursts that are delineated
by long periods (50,000 – 100,000 years in most cases) of
stasis where no apparent changes take place. This
contemporary theory of evolution, however, has not gained
widespread acceptance and remains highly controversial
(Futuyma 1986; Sober 1995). Clearly, to produce a
significant evolutionary burst of this magnitude would
require a most striking event leading to an abrupt change
in gene frequency. Of the forces that are touted to alter
gene frequency and drive evolution (inverse of Hardy-
Weinberg Law assumptions; Griffiths 1996), none appear
capable of generating such a dramatic alteration so
quickly. Though genetic drift has been invoked to explain
this anomaly, its impact, too, has been challenged
(Futuyma 1986; Sober 1995). How evolution becomes
‘punctuated’ is puzzling.
One possibility could involve magnetic (polarity)
reversal, a relatively rapid change in the polarity of
Earth’s geomagnetic field where the North Pole becomes
the south magnetic pole and vice versa (Jacobs 1984).
This theoretical force of evolution operates on Ecke et
al.’s (1995) newly-discovered relationship between chiral
symmetry ( handedness) and the orientation of the
magnetic field; spiral defect patterns displaying
distinct handedness form observed in a chaotic flow of
carbon dioxide in a Rayleigh-Benard convection broke
symmetry when the rotation about the vertical axis
(spiral analog of the magnetic field) was reversed. These
investigators concluded that the winding direction of a
spiral was analogous to a magnetic spin. That is, a
right-handed magnetic spin generates a clockwise spiral
and a left-handed magnetic spin reverses the spiral
counterclockwise.
With regard to DNA, a change in the orientation of the
magnetic field would therefore translate into a left-
handed (counterclockwise spiral) to right-hand (clockwise
spiral) switch (Z-DNA to B-DNA that can now be
transcribed) or the reverse (B-DNA to Z-DNA whose role
may be involved with regulating expression of certain
genes or in genetic recombination) (Lodish et al. 1995;
Griffiths 1996). Such changes in handedness of DNA would
lead to gene activation or deactivation (Lodish et al.
1995), differential gene expression, and a change in gene
frequency that drives evolution. Most strikingly, as is
well known to geologists, reversals in the orientation of
the Earth’s magnetic field occur every 10,000 – 100,000
years (Jacobs 1984) and thus, the pronounced bursts of
speciation associated with punctuated-equilibrium
evolution are reflected by abrupt changes in gene
frequency as a result thereof.
My theory operates on the following premises:
1.) The DNA double-helix exists in both right-handed,
clockwise spiral (B-DNA) and left-handed,
counterclockwise spiral (Z-DNA, though only in short
tracts) forms in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells (Lodish
et al. 1995; Griffiths 1996);
2.) Only B-DNA is transcribed, whereas Z-DNA is not
(Lodish et al. 1995; Griffiths 1996);
3.) A change in magnetic field orientation affects
chirality or handedness; the winding direction of a
spiral is analogous to a magnetic spin (Ecke et al.
1995);
4.) Geomagnetic polarity reversals involve changes in the
polarity of the Earth’s magnetic field, where the North
Pole becomes the south magnetic pole and vice versa
(Jacobs 1984);
5.) Geomagnetic polarity reversals occur relatively
rapidly (Jacobs 1984);
6.) A polarity reversal occurs every 10,000 – 100,000
years (Jacobs 1984);
and on the following assumptions:
1.) A switch in the handedness of DNA (Z to B or the
reverse) is responsible for the differential gene
expression and hence, changes in gene frequency (Hardy-
Weinberg equilibrium is violated; evolution = 0) (Lodish
et al. 1995; Griffiths 1996). Short Z-DNA tracts may play
a role in the regulation of the expression of certain
genes or in genetic recombination (Lodish et al. 1995;
Griffiths 1996).
2.) The direction of winding (handedness) of DNA is
influenced by the orientation of the magnetic field, an
assumption taken from Ecke et al.’s (1995) observations.
Thus, an inversion of B-polarity causes a change in the
winding direction.
3.) Certain sequences of DNA are more labile
(‘electromagnetically vulnerable’, thus more prone to
reversal of spin) than others with regard to magnetism,
otherwise, a magnetic reversal as described would lead to
more dramatic changes in simply activating or
deactivating genes. Massive species extinction may be
expected if net Z-DNA switched to B-DNA, because the
‘blue print’ has been completely altered, not just
modified. Thus, the entire genome does not reverse spin;
a change from B-DNA to intranscribable Z-form would be
lethal to all organisms.
In accordance with this theory, variations in timing
between ‘punctuated’ peaks of speciation can be accounted
for by such natural phenomena as (Jacobs 1984; Butler
1992):
1.) Short periods of constant geometric polarity, usually
10,000 years (polarity epochs = polarity interval; the
time interval is called a magnetic epoch).
Taken together, these considerations imply that the
bursts of speciation associated with punctuated-
equilibrium evolution derive from a simple handedness-
switch from B-DNA to Z-DNA, or B to Z, in response to a
relatively rapid reversal in the orientation in Earth’s
magnetic field. For the first time, this reveals that
Earth’s magnetic field is an important natural force of
evolution.
Additionaly Considerations
Single-stranded DNA possessed by certain viruses,
prokaryotes and protists is anticipated to react to
magnetism in a like manner, because their DNA is probably
twisted in some way due to the presence of chiral centers
in nucleotides. Evolution would be expected to proceed
slowly in organisms living in certain geographic
‘islands’ that are unaffected by shifts in magnetic
field. Reversals in magnetic polarity as described may be
more likely to produce a genesis instead of evolution;
changing the ‘handedness’ of an organism’s DNA may be
expected to be completely intranscribable in many
species, and, thereby yield many ‘new’ species. The
fossil record would thus show many of the extinct species
shortly after the magnetic reversal. Reversal times may
correlate directly with bursts of speciation;
alternatively, they may be out of sync.
As a final comment, proof that the magnetic field exerts
an impact on gene expression has recently been
demonstrated Rao and Henderson (1996) reported
electromagnetic field sensitivity on regulation of the
c-fos gene that encodes the Fos protein, an important
nuclear transcription factor. Thus, there is a link
between magnetic field and gene expression.
Author’s note – The purpose of this article is to foster
discussion, with the hope that it will lead to new
research in this particular area.
Literature Cited
Butler RF. 1992. Paleomagnetism. Oxford; Blackwell
Scientific Publications.
Ecke RE, Hu Y, Mainieri R, and Ahlers G. 1995. Excitation
of spirals and chiral symmetry breaking in Rayleigh
Benard Convection. Science 269:1704-1707.
Eldredge N, and Gould SJ. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an
alternative to phyletic gradualism. In TJM. Schopf (Ed.),
Models in paleobiology San Francisco; Freeman, Cooper and
Company pp. 82-115.
Futuyma DJ. 1986. Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland;
Sinaur.
Griffiths AJF, Miller JH, Suzuki DT, Lewontin RC, and
Gelbart WM. 1996. An introduction to Genetic Analysis.
New York; WH. Freeman.
Jacobs JA. 1994. Reversals of the Earth’s Magnetic Field.
Bristol; Adam Hilger.
Lodish H, Baltimore D, Berk A, Zipursky SL, Matsudaira P,
and Darnell J. 1995. Molecular Cell Biology. New York;
WH. Freeman.
Rao S, and Henderson AS. Regulation of c-fos is affected
by electromagnetic fields. Journal of Cellular
Biochemistry. 1996. 63:358-365.
Sober E. Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. 1995.
Cambridge; The MIT Press.
Here is a summary I found online…
First, the Earth’s magnetic field may influence the
dominant ‘handedness’ (or chirality) of DNA (basically
which direction it spirals). B-DNA (right-handed DNA) is
transcribed, while Z-DNA (left handed) is mostly unstable
and it may be used for other processes. If a magnetic
reversal were to occur, this might cause transcription of
B-DNA to cease and Z-DNA transcription to take over (at
least for certain electromagnetically sensitive genes).
Thus, under such a scenario, biological creatures would
undergo rapid mutations (or extinctions depending on the
size and scope of the genetic changes). This is
ultimately what the author believes causes the observed
punctuated equilibrium in the fossil record.