Did you observe him saying that he would do this? Because he said it right there. Are you calling him a liar? Don't try and dress this is up as anything other than what it is- you are accusing him of being unwilling to do what he has openly stated he is willing to do.
It's harsh but yes, I can call him liar till he hasn't shown otherwise. Because I can also claim all kind of things here without any need to do them. Does that make me willing or capable of doing them if I just say it here on internet?
And again you emphasize the fact that FET people have no interest in publicity of their theory but other must do this if these others are interested.
For years I participated in public debate (though not regarding FET), and it has convinced me that public debate/discussion does not favour the best argument, but the best debator. Go to any debating society, and every week they'll have debates where one side is for and the other against a particular motion. The reason they have this setup is because they recognise that a good debator can argue any point, no matter how valid or invalid it may be.
That is why I personally believe that the debate is a better format for discussions of this (or any) nature.
I see your point, but in my opinion the shape of the Earth isn't such subjective thing you can seriously debate for or against without any scientific research and only with your subjective opinions and thoughts. It's not really hard science then, it's rather philosophy then.
But I still cant bring myself to call it real arguing because this kind of arguing can't really go further from superficial. Because if anyone is really interested in FET then you can't refer him to any modern scientific work about that.
......What?
I guess you can refer me then to some modern scientific work about flat earth?