UFO's

  • 78 Replies
  • 13661 Views
*

Guessed

  • 5379
Re: UFO's
« Reply #60 on: July 07, 2009, 10:02:37 AM »
Existence implies life. How could they exist there if they can't live there?
Is Dino open source?

Quote from: grogberries


*

svenanders

  • 831
  • I'm always right. If you disagree, you're wrong.
Re: UFO's
« Reply #61 on: July 07, 2009, 10:11:35 AM »
Existence implies life. How could they exist there if they can't live there?

They could just float dead?

*

svenanders

  • 831
  • I'm always right. If you disagree, you're wrong.
Re: UFO's
« Reply #62 on: July 07, 2009, 11:09:46 AM »


Not these kind of fireflies.

*

Sexual Harassment Panda

  • 7082
  • Now more sophisticated
Re: UFO's
« Reply #63 on: July 07, 2009, 01:01:28 PM »
Existence implies life. How could they exist there if they can't live there?

They could just float dead?

This, they will still be there, just that they won't be alive. A book exists on the table in front of me, but it's not alive.
|^^^^^^^^^^^\||_____          
|     STFU          |||""'|"""\___            O
| ______________|||___|__|__|)          -|- 
  (@)@)""""""**|(@)(@)**|(@)          / \

New Flat Earth FAQ: http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30512.0

*

svenanders

  • 831
  • I'm always right. If you disagree, you're wrong.
Re: UFO's
« Reply #64 on: July 07, 2009, 01:10:52 PM »
Existence implies life. How could they exist there if they can't live there?

They could just float dead?

This, they will still be there, just that they won't be alive. A book exists on the table in front of me, but it's not alive.

Exactly my point as well.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: UFO's
« Reply #65 on: July 07, 2009, 02:37:26 PM »
Exactly my point as well.

So that was what you meant by:

Why can't a firefly exist in space?
Because they can't live there.

Was it?
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Pongo

  • Planar Moderator
  • 6753
Re: UFO's
« Reply #66 on: July 07, 2009, 02:51:31 PM »
New theory. The sun is not a spotlight, but rather a huge colony of fireflies.

That's dumb.  If anything, the sun is composed of glow worms.

Re: UFO's
« Reply #67 on: July 07, 2009, 02:56:23 PM »
Existence implies life. How could they exist there if they can't live there?

They could just float dead?

This, they will still be there, just that they won't be alive. A book exists on the table in front of me, but it's not alive.

Exactly my point as well.


Nice troll.
I fail, but at least I don't not jerk off to "cake".

*

svenanders

  • 831
  • I'm always right. If you disagree, you're wrong.
Re: UFO's
« Reply #68 on: July 07, 2009, 03:04:42 PM »
« Last Edit: July 08, 2009, 07:55:11 AM by svenanders »

*

Sexual Harassment Panda

  • 7082
  • Now more sophisticated
Re: UFO's
« Reply #69 on: July 08, 2009, 07:28:47 AM »
Exactly my point as well.

So that was what you meant by:

Why can't a firefly exist in space?
Because they can't live there.


Was it?

I believe so.

No, you didn't mean what I said, but as soon as you realized you were out-witted by a retard, you jumped on the bandwagon. Also, fix'd quote fail.
|^^^^^^^^^^^\||_____          
|     STFU          |||""'|"""\___            O
| ______________|||___|__|__|)          -|- 
  (@)@)""""""**|(@)(@)**|(@)          / \

New Flat Earth FAQ: http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30512.0

*

svenanders

  • 831
  • I'm always right. If you disagree, you're wrong.
Re: UFO's
« Reply #70 on: July 08, 2009, 07:54:40 AM »
Exactly my point as well.

So that was what you meant by:

Why can't a firefly exist in space?
Because they can't live there.


Was it?

I believe so.

No, you didn't mean what I said, but as soon as you realized you were out-witted by a retard, you jumped on the bandwagon. Also, fix'd quote fail.

What I meant was that they can exist in space, like the book on a table example, if some one puts them there, but they can't exist, as in live and do what they normally do.

Now back on topic.
Anyone else want to explain the video i presented?
« Last Edit: July 08, 2009, 07:56:39 AM by svenanders »

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12993
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: UFO's
« Reply #71 on: July 08, 2009, 08:11:50 AM »

*

svenanders

  • 831
  • I'm always right. If you disagree, you're wrong.
Re: UFO's
« Reply #72 on: July 08, 2009, 08:20:55 AM »
Fireflies.

Doesn't look like fireflies to me. Now stop trolling and GTFO!

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12993
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: UFO's
« Reply #73 on: July 08, 2009, 08:24:50 AM »
The earth doesn't look round to me. Now stop trolling and GTFO!

*

Sexual Harassment Panda

  • 7082
  • Now more sophisticated
Re: UFO's
« Reply #74 on: July 08, 2009, 08:26:14 AM »
That video is so easily faked. I mean come on, it's a black screen with some yellow dots flying around on it.
|^^^^^^^^^^^\||_____          
|     STFU          |||""'|"""\___            O
| ______________|||___|__|__|)          -|- 
  (@)@)""""""**|(@)(@)**|(@)          / \

New Flat Earth FAQ: http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30512.0

*

svenanders

  • 831
  • I'm always right. If you disagree, you're wrong.
Re: UFO's
« Reply #75 on: July 08, 2009, 08:32:41 AM »
That video is so easily faked. I mean come on, it's a black screen with some yellow dots flying around on it.

It's not enough to say that the video is faked. Unless you can prove that the video is faked, your argument is worthless.

*

svenanders

  • 831
  • I'm always right. If you disagree, you're wrong.
Re: UFO's
« Reply #76 on: July 08, 2009, 08:34:09 AM »
The earth doesn't look round to me. Now stop trolling and GTFO!

The earth shape got nothing to do with this thread. Stop derailing!

*

Sexual Harassment Panda

  • 7082
  • Now more sophisticated
Re: UFO's
« Reply #77 on: July 08, 2009, 09:13:24 AM »
That video is so easily faked. I mean come on, it's a black screen with some yellow dots flying around on it.

It's not enough to say that the video is faked. Unless you can prove that the video is faked, your argument is worthless.

Can you prove that the video is real?
|^^^^^^^^^^^\||_____          
|     STFU          |||""'|"""\___            O
| ______________|||___|__|__|)          -|- 
  (@)@)""""""**|(@)(@)**|(@)          / \

New Flat Earth FAQ: http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30512.0

*

Soze

  • 1291
  • Flat Earth Proponent
Re: UFO's
« Reply #78 on: July 12, 2009, 10:04:57 PM »
No, have you?
Was I making any claims?

They need oxygen to live. There are no oxygen in space.

Let me be more precise, since you're pointing out semantics.
There is not enough oxygen in space for a firefly to breath.

It's not semantics...
I asked if you had proof (because you made a claim). In response, you asked if I had any proof. Since I wasn't taking a position, I wasn't obligated to provide proof. I pointed out that I had made no claims. You now tell me it is semantics?