The All-Powerful TGC ~ An Analysis of "Grand Conspiracies" in Logical Debate.

Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on June 20, 2009, 08:57:29 PM

Quote from: mazty88 on June 20, 2009, 07:43:28 PM

Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on June 19, 2009, 08:20:43 PM

Quote from: Skeptek on June 15, 2009, 10:18:07 AM

Debating the probability of any Grand Conspiracy is exactly what we should NOT be doing.  It only detracts from any real scientific debate.  That's why I created this thread.

You created this thread to troll.

Showing a flaw in logical reasoning isn't trolling.
Not accepting a bullsh*t argument for what it is, however, is trolling.

Right.  You make a thread that purports to be about grand conspiracies, and how they apply to this forum, but if a FEer brings up our grand conspiracy they are going off topic or trolling.  To be honest it's really not even all that clever and I feel sorry for those who have already fallen for it.

There's number 9 on the "Tools of The Debate Impostor" list once again.  This thread is not "about grand conspiracies" in any way that involves discussing the theories themselves.  It's only about how using any one as an argument is proof of pseudoscience.

But then... you knew that didn't you?  The "Tools of The Debate Impostor" are the favored tactics for getting off-topic and Number 9 is a Doozy!  Well executed, but not very creative.

Do you have any evidence to support your outlandish claims?

You're a fucking joke. 

Do you have any evidence to support your outlandish claims?

You're a fucking joke. 

This thread and my others are the best evidence I could have ever hoped for, thanks to you and folks like you.

Although from your point of view, the joke is quite large and quite funny, it is not all there is to who and/or what I am, so the statement is not quite accurate.  I will however, grant you - if you insist - that I am one funny mother-fucker.