regaurding flatness

  • 16 Replies
  • 4367 Views
?

SourMilk

  • 23
  • +0/-0
regaurding flatness
« on: May 14, 2009, 05:07:21 PM »
if I went to the edge of an ocean and pointed a high powered telescope directly foward, why wouldn't I be able to see people on the next continent? if the earth is flat, I should be able to see them

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2009, 05:10:54 PM »
Read the FAQ
Use the search function.
Lurk moar.


To answer your question, there are two theories behind this. The first is that air is slightly opaque. The second is due to "Electromagnetic Accelration", or "bendy light".

Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2009, 05:16:04 PM »
Read the FAQ
Use the search function.
Lurk moar.


To answer your question, there are two theories behind this. The first is that air is slightly opaque. The second is due to "Electromagnetic Accelration", or "bendy light".
Both of which are quickly falsified by FEers themselves.
That ship's masts appear first as the come into port from sea is admitted by even Rowbotham, himself. Clearly opaqueness would affect both the mast and the hull in the same way.

That "bendy light" is still a ridiculous concept is admitted by even the FAQ themselves.

?

SourMilk

  • 23
  • +0/-0
Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2009, 05:16:32 PM »
omg, bendy light is the best you can come up with? ok, so how about this, why are there stars on the horzon when there should be objects blocking the stars of view? unless the stars light some how get all bendy on us and jump infront of the objects

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2009, 05:27:55 PM »
Read the FAQ
Use the search function.
Lurk moar.


To answer your question, there are two theories behind this. The first is that air is slightly opaque. The second is due to "Electromagnetic Accelration", or "bendy light".
Both of which are quickly falsified by FEers themselves.
That ship's masts appear first as the come into port from sea is admitted by even Rowbotham, himself. Clearly opaqueness would affect both the mast and the hull in the same way.

That "bendy light" is still a ridiculous concept is admitted by even the FAQ themselves.
I was responding to this post.
if I went to the edge of an ocean and pointed a high powered telescope directly foward, why wouldn't I be able to see people on the next continent? if the earth is flat, I should be able to see them

Ship masts are explainable through perspective effects, bendy light, or some spiral theory that grogberries is working on.

omg, bendy light is the best you can come up with? ok, so how about this, why are there stars on the horzon when there should be objects blocking the stars of view? unless the stars light some how get all bendy on us and jump infront of the objects
This is an English speaking forum, please speak English.

?

MisterHamper

  • 212
  • +0/-0
Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2009, 05:33:32 PM »
some spiral theory that grogberries is working on.


Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2009, 05:33:56 PM »
...

Ship masts are explainable through perspective effects, bendy light, or some spiral theory that grogberries is working on.

...

You can't both explain ship masts and claim that being unable to see distant continents is caused by opaqueness of the atmosphere, at the same time. Do pay attention.

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2009, 05:36:09 PM »
some spiral theory that grogberries is working on.


I didn't say this was why,I was just saying that it is a POSSIBLE (not probable) reason.

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2009, 05:38:12 PM »
...

Ship masts are explainable through perspective effects, bendy light, or some spiral theory that grogberries is working on.

...

You can't both explain ship masts and claim that being unable to see distant continents is caused by opaqueness of the atmosphere, at the same time. Do pay attention.
The favored reason for the continent is opaqueness, and ship mast by perspective effects. (or both can be explained with bendy light.) Please pay attention.

?

SourMilk

  • 23
  • +0/-0
Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #9 on: May 14, 2009, 05:39:02 PM »
some spiral theory that grogberries is working on.


I didn't say this was why,I was just saying that it is a POSSIBLE (not probable) reason.

but it's the only thing you can come up with, our reasoning, along with everyone with an elemetary education is it goes around the horizon

Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #10 on: May 14, 2009, 05:44:23 PM »
...

Ship masts are explainable through perspective effects, bendy light, or some spiral theory that grogberries is working on.

...

You can't both explain ship masts and claim that being unable to see distant continents is caused by opaqueness of the atmosphere, at the same time. Do pay attention.
The favored reason for the continent is opaqueness, and ship mast by perspective effects. (or both can be explained with bendy light.) Please pay attention.
Did you read the part where I said you can't have both without irresolvable conflict? Do you care to address that now?

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #11 on: May 14, 2009, 05:50:32 PM »
some spiral theory that grogberries is working on.


I didn't say this was why,I was just saying that it is a POSSIBLE (not probable) reason.

but it's the only thing you can come up with, our reasoning, along with everyone with an elemetary education is it goes around the horizon
I offered two other, far more likely, explanations. You are obviously putting that elementary education to work with the whole comprehension thing.

...

Ship masts are explainable through perspective effects, bendy light, or some spiral theory that grogberries is working on.

...

You can't both explain ship masts and claim that being unable to see distant continents is caused by opaqueness of the atmosphere, at the same time. Do pay attention.
The favored reason for the continent is opaqueness, and ship mast by perspective effects. (or both can be explained with bendy light.) Please pay attention.
Did you read the part where I said you can't have both without irresolvable conflict? Do you care to address that now?
Please explain how they conflict. As far as I see,they actually work together rather well.

Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #12 on: May 14, 2009, 06:54:39 PM »
...

...

Ship masts are explainable through perspective effects, bendy light, or some spiral theory that grogberries is working on.

...

You can't both explain ship masts and claim that being unable to see distant continents is caused by opaqueness of the atmosphere, at the same time. Do pay attention.
The favored reason for the continent is opaqueness, and ship mast by perspective effects. (or both can be explained with bendy light.) Please pay attention.
Did you read the part where I said you can't have both without irresolvable conflict? Do you care to address that now?
Please explain how they conflict. As far as I see,they actually work together rather well.
Well, at least you're reading what I write now...

It's really easy to see the conflict. If one accepts the perspective effect hides distant objects, then there's no opportunity for the opaqueness to interfere with seeing distant continents.

?

grogberries

  • 3468
  • +0/-0
  • I am large! I contain multitudes!
Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #13 on: May 14, 2009, 07:02:01 PM »
some spiral theory that grogberries is working on.



This is what people look like when they realise their life is a lie and that light travels in spirals.
Think hard. Think Flat.

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #14 on: May 14, 2009, 07:06:27 PM »
I try to avoid reading what others write.
I have not done extensive research on the topic, but isn't opaqueness a key part of the perspective effect?

?

Roger765

  • 64
  • +0/-0
Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #15 on: May 14, 2009, 07:07:22 PM »
The quoting style of this forum is retarded, why must i view the same picture 4 times. This is pure retardation.

Re: regaurding flatness
« Reply #16 on: May 14, 2009, 07:09:23 PM »
I try to avoid reading what others write.
I have not done extensive research on the topic, but isn't opaqueness a key part of the perspective effect?
Obviously... and
No.