Origin of the "Conspiracy"

  • 67 Replies
  • 14679 Views
?

MisterHamper

  • 212
  • +0/-0
Re: Origin of the "Conspiracy"
« Reply #60 on: May 07, 2009, 06:05:34 PM »
I don't personally believe anyone is guarding the ice wall. It's possible that they have a couple of guys who helicopter out when someone is getting a little too close for comfort, but other than that, you're right, it wouldn't be feasible to have so many men guarding a wall that very few people (if anyone) are trying to find anyway.

LOL How do you guys know they spent exactly 47 million dollars?

I'm not actually sure where that number came from but I imagine it was estimated based on a number of factors.

Yeah right, ofcourse it was. That number came from someones ass is what it did.
You dont even know if they use GPS-airships or huge GPS-towers, or how they "protect" and "cover" the giant ice-wall. It could be anywhere from 50 million to 10 billion they should use. If they spent only 50 million, it would mean they could only hire 1000 men for 1 year.

I don't personally believe anyone is guarding the ice wall. It's possible that they have a couple of guys who helicopter out when someone is getting a little too close for comfort, but other than that, you're right, it wouldn't be feasible to have so many men guarding a wall that very few people (if anyone) are trying to find anyway.

And noone would find a giant ice-wall covering the whole fucking planet. And noone would notice planes is actually turning 180 degrees whenever they should be traveling over the Pacific Ocean, so they can "circumnavigate". Noone ever looks up at the sky and see those planes. It is not common for planes to even make a large turn. They fly straight pretty much every time. Noone ever records how much time or fuel a plane spent on going from one place to another, to see if it took the right route. Right, I think I got it now! Noone would be able to tell that planes and boats didn't went straight, but in fact made a 180 degree turn. For boats in a day, for planes in an hour.

By the way, NASA have way more than 1000 men right now, and that is WITHOUT having to cover up a stupid conspiracy like this.

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12960
  • +0/-0
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: Origin of the "Conspiracy"
« Reply #61 on: May 07, 2009, 06:37:28 PM »
It's an ice wall,not an ice dome.

?

MisterHamper

  • 212
  • +0/-0
Re: Origin of the "Conspiracy"
« Reply #62 on: May 07, 2009, 06:49:11 PM »
It's an ice wall,not an ice dome.

It would still be OVER ten times the size of Africa in order to reach around the whole world.
And no-one have found a continent ten times the size of Africa, that is right infront of their noses.

Oh yeah, that's right. Noone ever explores for new land. How did Europeans find Africa and America and Asia back in the old days?
If you actually knew you flew/sailed through the Southern Ocean, and not the Pacific Ocean (which you would easily be able to tell as a captain/pilot, because you would have to make TWO somewhat sharp 180 degree turn), people would wonder what's "behind" the Pacific Ocean.

But oh yeah, that's right. People wouldn't wonder about that. They wouldn't give a fuck that their plane or boat magically turns left or right.

*

W

  • 2288
  • +0/-0
Re: Origin of the "Conspiracy"
« Reply #63 on: May 07, 2009, 06:54:09 PM »
But oh yeah, that's right. People wouldn't wonder about that. They wouldn't give a fuck that their plane or boat magically turns left or right.

Look, you have your opinion, and we have ours. Why are you so angry about that?
If you say that the earth is flat, you are destroying centuries of evolution.

?

MisterHamper

  • 212
  • +0/-0
Re: Origin of the "Conspiracy"
« Reply #64 on: May 07, 2009, 07:16:13 PM »
But oh yeah, that's right. People wouldn't wonder about that. They wouldn't give a fuck that their plane or boat magically turns left or right.

Look, you have your opinion, and we have ours. Why are you so angry about that?

I am not mad, I just cant believe this is all real. You guys must be trolls. It is the most ridiculous conspiracy I have ever heard. And to call people, that don't believe in that conspiracy for idiots is just as stupid.

You NEVER give any proof at all in any of the posts in this forum. Your whole FAQ is one big bullshit. All your theories is flawed. When someone from RET come with real proof, as have happened many times before, you either 1) make up an even more bullshit excuse or 2) just ignore it, or 3) call him a noob.

If this was really serious, you are doing a pretty damn bad job at uncovering this whole conspiracy. But is it really serious? Can people be that stupid?

I have already proven how things can stick to the Earth (fx people, or water), how you only can see the top of things from far away (the masts on ships fx), why the Earth LOOKS flat, why there is no conspiracy, how you can PROVE there is not a constant circumnavigation, how GPS must work and MUCH MORE.
And what have you guys done? Given some one-liners and bullshit. This is ridiculous. You guys can't be real.

*

W

  • 2288
  • +0/-0
Re: Origin of the "Conspiracy"
« Reply #65 on: May 07, 2009, 08:00:34 PM »
I don't like the assertion that anyone who doesn't subscribe to the majority views is "stupid." In fact, I think it's very closed minded.
If you say that the earth is flat, you are destroying centuries of evolution.

?

MisterHamper

  • 212
  • +0/-0
Re: Origin of the "Conspiracy"
« Reply #66 on: May 08, 2009, 03:44:54 AM »
I don't like the assertion that anyone who doesn't subscribe to the majority views is "stupid." In fact, I think it's very closed minded.

It isn't about sucscribing to whatever the majority believes. It's subscribiing to believe something as silly as the Earth being flat, and then explaining all the things going on in the world by silly bullshit that everyone can see is not true. And THEN don't answering those people, that actually have solid proof of the Earth being round. You guys are the very closed-minded. I would love to see some PROOF from a Flat Earth'er. Pretty much all RET's would, I believe, and not because we want the world to be flat, but because we like the truth. But there is no proof at all. You guys hate to see proof of a Round Earth, which there is TONS of.

?

munkirench

  • 231
  • +0/-0
Re: Origin of the "Conspiracy"
« Reply #67 on: May 08, 2009, 04:42:29 PM »
Exactly... the problem with FET is that it assumes that it is correct to reject the majority view, instead of realizing that "majority" views on matters of fact occur because there exists such a thing as truth.  It's not a question of "blindly following the majority" but of every member of the majority reaching the same conclusion independently.

Like I've said in a different post, FEer (probably) started out with an ideal of "question everything" (which I absolutely agree with) to "reject everything".  Which really is stupid.  And by stupid I don't mean silly, or ridiculous.  I mean it is the product of a retarded mind.
When I look out my window, I see exactly what RET predicts.