Antarctic Cruises

  • 29 Replies
  • 5546 Views
*

E349

  • 68
  • Velociraptor Exterminator
Antarctic Cruises
« on: April 13, 2009, 07:12:19 AM »
I am sure that this topic has been covered before, but what of the matter of Antarctic cruises? At this point in time a number of Cruise Liners make Antarctic voyages in which thousands of individuals, myself being one of them, can get up close and personal with such antarctic features as continental ice shelfs and the likes of such. How exactly does this fit into FE conspiracy theories? If the governments of the world are conspiring to keep the public ignorant, why would they allow the public to experience, first hand, one of the most closely guarded aspects of the secret, the giant ice wall? Please discuss.
If not responding is a win, then FET has won many times. You just won a small battle yourself.
Hooray! I am WIN

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2009, 07:21:50 AM »
I am sure that this topic has been covered before, but what of the matter of Antarctic cruises? At this point in time a number of Cruise Liners make Antarctic voyages in which thousands of individuals, myself being one of them, can get up close and personal with such antarctic features as continental ice shelfs and the likes of such. How exactly does this fit into FE conspiracy theories? If the governments of the world are conspiring to keep the public ignorant, why would they allow the public to experience, first hand, one of the most closely guarded aspects of the secret, the giant ice wall? Please discuss.

Are you suggesting it would look better for the Conspiracy if they stopped all civilians travelling beyond 60° S latitude?
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2009, 06:52:23 PM »
[size=1000pt]booh yahh robosteve suck that one[/size]

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2009, 06:54:09 PM »
It would certainly stop people having first hand evidence of flat earth busting concepts such as permanant daylight and permanant night.

Those phenomena are not only known to occur, but are also adequately explained by Flat Earth Theory.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13149
  • swiggity swooty
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #4 on: April 13, 2009, 06:54:39 PM »
[size=1000pt]booh yahh robosteve suck that one[/size]

fail

?

utilitarianism

  • 176
  • do you know the muffin man...
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2009, 07:51:23 PM »
it is more than possible that there are layers of ice on the water before the actual ice wall. it is probable that you were simply taken too a large sheet of ice possibly having fallen off the ice wall and told that it was a "continental ice shelf"

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #6 on: April 14, 2009, 01:31:50 PM »
Really? There's nothing in the FAQ.

OK well the floor is yours, explain away Robot.

Permanent night is easily explained away. The Sun gets too far away from the extremities of the Earth to be visible.

Permanent day in the hubward circle is also easy to explain. The Sun simply circles around it without getting far away enough to set.

Permanent day in the rimward annulus may be explained by the presence of an enormous mirror in the sky, far above the stars, which reflects the sunlight back down onto the part of the Ice Wall that would otherwise be dark.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #7 on: April 14, 2009, 02:04:16 PM »
Um you do know that the sun sets prior to permanant night, right?

If the sun was too far away it would simple remain in the sky and peter out as the observer travelled south. That's not what is observed.

No. Please read the FAQ and lurk moar.

Bear in mind that sunlight travels millions of miles to get to the earth.

No it doesn't.

Hmm, so sometimes the sun does set, and othertimes it just remains in the sky. Pretty weird how you can pick both sides at once huh?

Not really. When it's closer, it's in the sky. Pretty simple, once you factor in EA theory.

Enormous mirrors in the sky. LOL. I can't believe I wasted my time replying to this thread and then I get to shite like that. You owe me 5 minutes of my life. :(

You asked the question, I gave an answer. If someone else has an alternative theory, I'd love to hear it.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #8 on: April 14, 2009, 02:22:20 PM »
"No" is not an answer. I read the FAQ. It doesn't explain this topic. Hence the debate.

Also, you seem to want to reject the FAQ (especially the bit about light not bending) Can you tell me which bits I should believe and which I shouldn't? Ta.

"No" is a perfectly valid answer when you are showing your ignorance of the content of the FAQ. Also, the FAQ is a perfectly valid document, provided you keep in mind that there are a few different strains of FET and not every Flat Earther will agree with absolutely everything in it - but it is generally accepted as an explanation for most basic phenomena.

Yes it does. Learn basic astronomy/ physics. http://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu/cosmic_kids/AskKids/sundist.shtml

I thought we were discussing FET, in which the Sun is a lot closer than that.

Except light doesn't bend. Read the FAQ. And you're f*cking with Pythagoras in ways that would make a kindergarden teacher want to speak to your parents.

I don't believe Pythagoras' Theorem says anything about the angles in a triangle. And even if it did, a three-sided figure with one side that is not straight is not a triangle.

And I illustrated how ridiculous your answer was. The alternative theory is a round earth. You might remember hearing about it at school...

You didn't illustrate anything. You stated that it was ridiculous with no reasoning or evidence for your claim.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #9 on: April 14, 2009, 02:32:08 PM »
Oh dear lord. Get thee to a school with a sympathetic teacher.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras%27_theorem

Take careful notice of the difference between a side and an angle.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #10 on: April 14, 2009, 04:59:53 PM »
Take careful notice of the use of the phrase "right angle".

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #11 on: April 14, 2009, 06:08:38 PM »
Take careful notice of the use of the phrase "right angle".

Take careful notice of the difference between the words "angle" and "angles".

I don't believe Pythagoras' Theorem says anything about the angles in a triangle.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12993
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #12 on: April 14, 2009, 07:08:12 PM »
I'm still wondering how the hell triangles factor into this.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #13 on: April 14, 2009, 07:46:24 PM »
I'm still wondering how the hell triangles factor into this.

They would, if light travelled in straight lines.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

E349

  • 68
  • Velociraptor Exterminator
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #14 on: April 15, 2009, 07:10:38 AM »
I don't quite think that you guys are grasping what I am trying to get at. Here let me explain the series of events as I see it:

1) Some ancient "scientist" and a corrupt government space agency discover that, contrary to the beliefs of millions of people and the conclusions derived from thousands of scientific observations, the earth is in fact as flat as a pancake. Oh.....and there's a giant wall of ice surrounding the earth.

2) The corrupt space agency realizes that there is no money to be made from flat-earth space discovery and creates an elaborate plan to hide the reality from the ignorant and unsuspecting population. They form a vast bureaucracy and *efficiently* manage to carry out a program of misinformation while staying within their *budget constraints*.

3) This forum is created and you, the "enlightened" individuals who will spread this universal truth, go about divulging the information that the government has spent billions of dollars to cover up.

4) The government does absolutely nothing about this because they know that nobody will believe you and that everybody will dismiss you as a group of crazies. I wonder why? ::)

5) Cruise line companies exploit the last natural frontier that the earth possesses, the ice wall. They show thousands of obese tourists the massive geological formation that the government has spent billions of dollars and employed thousands of guards to hide and defend.

6) The government, once again, does absa-fucking-lutely nothing about this.

Now, I don't know if I being obtuse or something, but this sounds like the most poorly contrived conspiracy theory ever. You are telling me that the government is trying very hard to dupe us with the concept of gravity, but that it isn't doing shit to hide the 17,000 mile-long wall of ice whose farthest side proves the idea of a flat earth.

G-G-G-G-GET THE FUCK OUT

*question: since when has the government ever been able to do anything efficiently or within its budget constraints?
If not responding is a win, then FET has won many times. You just won a small battle yourself.
Hooray! I am WIN

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12993
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2009, 09:13:02 AM »
I don't quite think that you guys are grasping what I am trying to get at. Here let me explain the series of events as I see it:

1) Some ancient "scientist" and a corrupt government space agency discover that, contrary to the beliefs of millions of people and the conclusions derived from thousands of scientific observations, the earth is in fact as flat as a pancake. Oh.....and there's a giant wall of ice surrounding the earth.
Pancakes come in many different levels of thickness.
2) The corrupt space agency realizes that there is no money to be made from flat-earth space discovery and creates an elaborate plan to hide the reality from the ignorant and unsuspecting population. They form a vast bureaucracy and *efficiently* manage to carry out a program of misinformation while staying within their *budget constraints*.
NASA's budget is bigger than the GDP of small countries. And contrary to unpopular belief, money is power.
3) This forum is created and you, the "enlightened" individuals who will spread this universal truth, go about divulging the information that the government has spent billions of dollars to cover up.
Another win for Captain Obvious.
4) The government does absolutely nothing about this because they know that nobody will believe you and that everybody will dismiss you as a group of crazies. I wonder why? ::)
Also,because if they took it down it would just 1. Raise suspicion. and 2. Be put back up in a different country outside their control.
5) Cruise line companies exploit the last natural frontier that the earth possesses, the ice wall. They show thousands of obese tourists the massive geological formation that the government has spent billions of dollars and employed thousands of guards to hide and defend.
It wouldn't be suspicious at all if cruise lines were just flat out told "NO, you cant go there. You don't need to know why."
6) The government, once again, does absa-fucking-lutely nothing about this.
See above.
Now, I don't know if I being obtuse or something, but this sounds like the most poorly contrived conspiracy theory ever. You are telling me that the government is trying very hard to dupe us with the concept of gravity, but that it isn't doing shit to hide the 17,000 mile-long wall of ice whose farthest side proves the idea of a flat earth.

G-G-G-G-GET THE FUCK OUT
Bigger is not always better.
*question: since when has the government ever been able to do anything efficiently or within its budget constraints?
The majority of the time.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #16 on: April 15, 2009, 01:00:22 PM »
They would, if light travelled in straight lines.

Which it does.

Prove it.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #17 on: April 15, 2009, 01:51:30 PM »
Prove it.

"(light) consists of electric and magnetic field components which oscillate in phase perpendicular to each other and perpendicular to the direction of energy propagation."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation

Conventional science has made quite a bit of progress in the study of EM radiation since the turn of the last century. Many papers have been published describing the properties of said radiation, and one such property is that it generally travels in straight lines. While light will bend under the influence of EXTREME gravity or under the influence of a little gravity over extreme distances, on earth light will travel straight for all intensive purposes. Pick up a physics text book if you would like to learn more.

If you disagree with just about every bit of science conducted on EM radiation in the last 100 years, then the burden is on you to "prove it."  I have taken the liberty of writing an experiment that a citizen scientist can perform to confirm the curvature of light required by the flat earth hypothesis. Feel free to read it in my post on the science of the flat earth hypothesis.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2009, 01:53:29 PM by pestcontrol »

?

Dr Matrix

  • 4312
  • In Soviet Russia, Matrix enters you!
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #18 on: April 15, 2009, 02:25:44 PM »
Wikipedia does not constitute proof.
Quote from: Arthur Schopenhauer
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #19 on: April 15, 2009, 02:44:24 PM »
Wikipedia does not constitute proof.

If you had bothered to read my post, you would see that I was not offering wikipedia as proof. Although the quote included is accurate and wikipedia does generally provide good cited information (yes there are exceptions).

Anyways my point was that real science already described the properties of light long ago. FE "science" has... well... it hasn't done anything much other than claim that real science is wrong.

My point was that you FE people need to get some empirical evidence. I highly doubt your ability to synthesize reproducible experiments, I am merely using my posts to illustrate your own logical deficiencies. But if you produce a gem, even a single publishable paper that casts serious doubt on one scientific theory that I view as solid, I'll be the first to evaluate it and reconsider my conclusions.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17933
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #20 on: April 15, 2009, 03:12:04 PM »
Quote
Anyways my point was that real science already described the properties of light long ago.

So what does "real" science describe the properties of light as? Last I checked they didn't even know whether light was a particle or a wave.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2009, 03:14:17 PM by Tom Bishop »

?

zork

  • 3319
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #21 on: April 15, 2009, 03:27:08 PM »
So what does "real" science describe the properties of light as? Last I checked they didn't even know whether light was a particle or a wave.
  Yes, we know. You are still somewhere at year 1880 level with your science. I guess you should check some more recent information. And no, I don't present you any sources for that.
Rowbotham had bad eyesight
-
http://thulescientific.com/Lynch%20Curvature%202008.pdf - Visually discerning the curvature of the Earth
http://thulescientific.com/TurbulentShipWakes_Lynch_AO_2005.pdf - Turbulent ship wakes:further evidence that the Earth is round.

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12993
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #22 on: April 15, 2009, 03:34:19 PM »
So you claim to know something,but do not try in any way to prove it and/or even say what it is.

The world is either flat or round,and I'm not giving sources.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42529
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #23 on: April 15, 2009, 03:38:46 PM »
Quote
Anyways my point was that real science already described the properties of light long ago.

So what does "real" science describe the properties of light as? Last I checked they didn't even know whether light was a particle or a wave.

It's both.  http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/articles/ekspong/
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #24 on: April 15, 2009, 09:53:22 PM »
Last I checked they didn't even know whether light was a particle or a wave.

Have I ever told you that I love you?
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #25 on: April 16, 2009, 05:26:41 AM »
So what does "real" science describe the properties of light as? Last I checked they didn't even know whether light was a particle or a wave.

You crack me up. I imagine Tom driving round universities checking on "real" science progress. And the scientists having to confess that they don't know anything, and that they're very sorry but clearly Rowbotham was the best goddamn wingman a buddy could ever need in a firefight.

*

EnigmaZV

  • 3471
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #26 on: April 16, 2009, 12:48:45 PM »
It's both.  http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/articles/ekspong/

How does that work? Does light decide to exist as a particle Monday through Friday and then spend its weekends relaxing as a wave?   ???

That'd be a pretty sweet life.  Being solid all the time is hard work.

In reality, nobody understands the duality of light, all they know is it can't be a wave, because it has particle-like properties, and it can't be a particle because it has wave-like properties.

It's a wavicle.
I don't know what you're implying, but you're probably wrong.

*

E349

  • 68
  • Velociraptor Exterminator
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #27 on: April 18, 2009, 12:48:47 PM »
I don't quite think that you guys are grasping what I am trying to get at. Here let me explain the series of events as I see it:

1) Some ancient "scientist" and a corrupt government space agency discover that, contrary to the beliefs of millions of people and the conclusions derived from thousands of scientific observations, the earth is in fact as flat as a pancake. Oh.....and there's a giant wall of ice surrounding the earth.
Pancakes come in many different levels of thickness.
I am afraid that you have confused this planet for a pancake.
2) The corrupt space agency realizes that there is no money to be made from flat-earth space discovery and creates an elaborate plan to hide the reality from the ignorant and unsuspecting population. They form a vast bureaucracy and *efficiently* manage to carry out a program of misinformation while staying within their *budget constraints*.
NASA's budget is bigger than the GDP of small countries. And contrary to unpopular belief, money is power.
Yes, but NASA also employs more people than the populations of some small nations. And in accordance with popular belief, government = inefficiency.
3) This forum is created and you, the "enlightened" individuals who will spread this universal truth, go about divulging the information that the government has spent billions of dollars to cover up.
Another win for Captain Obvious.
It is amazing how you have failed to master that which you have pointed out.
4) The government does absolutely nothing about this because they know that nobody will believe you and that everybody will dismiss you as a group of crazies. I wonder why? ::)
Also,because if they took it down it would just 1. Raise suspicion. and 2. Be put back up in a different country outside their control.
Raise suspicion!?!?! Somehow the government has managed to dupe the entire world without raising suspicion and yet you don't think it capable of eliminating ONE WEBSITE.
5) Cruise line companies exploit the last natural frontier that the earth possesses, the ice wall. They show thousands of obese tourists the massive geological formation that the government has spent billions of dollars and employed thousands of guards to hide and defend.
It wouldn't be suspicious at all if cruise lines were just flat out told "NO, you cant go there. You don't need to know why."
While I admit that it would be very suspicious for the government to do this, it runs contrary to their policy of secrecy and global ignorance to permit it.
6) The government, once again, does absa-fucking-lutely nothing about this.
See above.
See above.
Now, I don't know if I being obtuse or something, but this sounds like the most poorly contrived conspiracy theory ever. You are telling me that the government is trying very hard to dupe us with the concept of gravity, but that it isn't doing shit to hide the 17,000 mile-long wall of ice whose farthest side proves the idea of a flat earth.

G-G-G-G-GET THE FUCK OUT
Bigger is not always better.
*question: since when has the government ever been able to do anything efficiently or within its budget constraints?
The majority of the time.
Let me remind you that this is the same government that needs six men to do a two-man job. Example: Road work.
If not responding is a win, then FET has won many times. You just won a small battle yourself.
Hooray! I am WIN

?

Dr Matrix

  • 4312
  • In Soviet Russia, Matrix enters you!
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #28 on: April 19, 2009, 01:23:30 PM »
I don't quite think that you guys are grasping what I am trying to get at. Here let me explain the series of events as I see it:

1) Some ancient "scientist" ... <rant rant rant> ...
Let me remind you that this is the same government that needs six men to do a two-man job. Example: Road work.

You know that fail scales in such a way that reposting it multiplies the failure? The above post is now fail3, I suggest you stop before you suffer a fail overflow.
Quote from: Arthur Schopenhauer
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

*

Benjamin Franklin

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12993
  • The dopest founding father.
Re: Antarctic Cruises
« Reply #29 on: April 19, 2009, 02:48:52 PM »
I don't quite think that you guys are grasping what I am trying to get at. Here let me explain the series of events as I see it:

1) Some ancient "scientist" and a corrupt government space agency discover that, contrary to the beliefs of millions of people and the conclusions derived from thousands of scientific observations, the earth is in fact as flat as a pancake. Oh.....and there's a giant wall of ice surrounding the earth.
Pancakes come in many different levels of thickness.
I am afraid that you have confused this planet for a pancake.
Quote
Actually,if you will notice the italics, you will see that you are the one who has mistaken this planet for a pancake.
2) The corrupt space agency realizes that there is no money to be made from flat-earth space discovery and creates an elaborate plan to hide the reality from the ignorant and unsuspecting population. They form a vast bureaucracy and *efficiently* manage to carry out a program of misinformation while staying within their *budget constraints*.
NASA's budget is bigger than the GDP of small countries. And contrary to unpopular belief, money is power.
Yes, but NASA also employs more people than the populations of some small nations. And in accordance with popular belief, government = inefficiency.
Quote
Enough of your "government is a big evil inefficient machine" ideals,anarchist. In reality, the government is rather efficient.
3) This forum is created and you, the "enlightened" individuals who will spread this universal truth, go about divulging the information that the government has spent billions of dollars to cover up.
Another win for Captain Obvious.
It is amazing how you have failed to master that which you have pointed out.
Quote
I'm not sure what you're getting at their,so I shall call you a banana.
4) The government does absolutely nothing about this because they know that nobody will believe you and that everybody will dismiss you as a group of crazies. I wonder why? ::)
Also,because if they took it down it would just 1. Raise suspicion. and 2. Be put back up in a different country outside their control.
Raise suspicion!?!?! Somehow the government has managed to dupe the entire world without raising suspicion and yet you don't think it capable of eliminating ONE WEBSITE.
Quote
I didn't say they couldn't, I said that won't for the previous reasons.
5) Cruise line companies exploit the last natural frontier that the earth possesses, the ice wall. They show thousands of obese tourists the massive geological formation that the government has spent billions of dollars and employed thousands of guards to hide and defend.
It wouldn't be suspicious at all if cruise lines were just flat out told "NO, you cant go there. You don't need to know why."
While I admit that it would be very suspicious for the government to do this, it runs contrary to their policy of secrecy and global ignorance to permit it.
Quote
Go put on a helmet,seriously. Do you have any idea how impossible of a task this would be? Even harder than convincing everyone that the world is round.
6) The government, once again, does absa-fucking-lutely nothing about this.
See above.
See above.
Quote
See above.
Now, I don't know if I being obtuse or something, but this sounds like the most poorly contrived conspiracy theory ever. You are telling me that the government is trying very hard to dupe us with the concept of gravity, but that it isn't doing shit to hide the 17,000 mile-long wall of ice whose farthest side proves the idea of a flat earth.

G-G-G-G-GET THE FUCK OUT
Bigger is not always better.
*question: since when has the government ever been able to do anything efficiently or within its budget constraints?
The majority of the time.
Let me remind you that this is the same government that needs six men to do a two-man job. Example: Road work.
Quote
I hate to say it,but do you have any evidence to support this outlandish claim?