« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

comet

  • 16 Replies
  • 3806 Views
?

galileo89

comet
« on: April 08, 2009, 05:58:43 AM »
what about comet? what are them?
Logged
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45084
  • +87/-117
Re: comet
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2009, 06:28:35 AM »
Quote from: galileo89 on April 08, 2009, 05:58:43 AM
what about comet? what are them?

Them are chunks of ice in highly elliptical orbits around the sun.
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
?

BuStErBuNkEr

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: comet
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2009, 07:17:51 AM »
Quote from: markjo on April 08, 2009, 06:28:35 AM
Quote from: galileo89 on April 08, 2009, 05:58:43 AM
what about comet? what are them?

Them are chunks of ice in highly elliptical orbits around the sun.

Comets orbit the sun?!
Logged
*

Delthan

  • 179
  • +0/-0
Re: comet
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2009, 08:46:36 AM »
Quote from: BuStErBuNkEr on April 08, 2009, 07:17:51 AM
Quote from: markjo on April 08, 2009, 06:28:35 AM
Quote from: galileo89 on April 08, 2009, 05:58:43 AM
what about comet? what are them?

Them are chunks of ice in highly elliptical orbits around the sun.

Comets orbit the sun?!

Yes
Logged
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE on March 13, 2009, 08:56:20 AM
Clothes are proof evolution never happened.
?

zork

  • 3338
  • +0/-0
Re: comet
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2009, 10:34:51 AM »
Quote from: markjo on April 08, 2009, 06:28:35 AM
Quote from: galileo89 on April 08, 2009, 05:58:43 AM
what about comet? what are them?

Them are chunks of ice in highly elliptical orbits around the sun.
I am in favor of some big chunks of glossy paper clued to these rotating celestial gears.
Logged
Rowbotham had bad eyesight
-
http://thulescientific.com/Lynch%20Curvature%202008.pdf - Visually discerning the curvature of the Earth
http://thulescientific.com/TurbulentShipWakes_Lynch_AO_2005.pdf - Turbulent ship wakes:further evidence that the Earth is round.
?

BuStErBuNkEr

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: comet
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2009, 11:35:57 AM »
Quote from: Delthan on April 08, 2009, 08:46:36 AM
Quote from: BuStErBuNkEr on April 08, 2009, 07:17:51 AM
Quote from: markjo on April 08, 2009, 06:28:35 AM
Quote from: galileo89 on April 08, 2009, 05:58:43 AM
what about comet? what are them?

Them are chunks of ice in highly elliptical orbits around the sun.

Comets orbit the sun?!

Yes

But nothing orbits the sun on the flat earth model! Do you have any proof of this satanic slander?!
Logged
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: comet
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2009, 12:14:26 PM »
Quote from: BuStErBuNkEr on April 08, 2009, 11:35:57 AM
Quote from: Delthan on April 08, 2009, 08:46:36 AM
Quote from: BuStErBuNkEr on April 08, 2009, 07:17:51 AM
Quote from: markjo on April 08, 2009, 06:28:35 AM
Quote from: galileo89 on April 08, 2009, 05:58:43 AM
what about comet? what are them?

Them are chunks of ice in highly elliptical orbits around the sun.

Comets orbit the sun?!

Yes

But nothing orbits the sun on the flat earth model! Do you have any proof of this satanic slander?!

Not true.  You're doing very little but spam the discussion forums right now.  If you don't have something meaningful to contribute, please don't post.
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
?

NTheGreat

  • 1019
  • +0/-0
Re: comet
« Reply #7 on: April 08, 2009, 03:56:06 PM »
I do wonder where the idea of comets orbiting the Sun in a FE model comes from, though. I didn't know there was anything that suggests the Sun had an attractive force, beyond the slight effect on the planet's tides. But then, shouldn't it be orbiting the Moon? That has a far greater apparent attraction in a FE model.

Perhaps I don't understand what FE'ers define as an orbit. Is a FE orbit different to a RE orbit?
Logged
?

zork

  • 3338
  • +0/-0
Re: comet
« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2009, 12:09:41 AM »
 There is also question about how can they move toward UA source when UA must push them away. What is the force that pushes them toward UA source.
Logged
Rowbotham had bad eyesight
-
http://thulescientific.com/Lynch%20Curvature%202008.pdf - Visually discerning the curvature of the Earth
http://thulescientific.com/TurbulentShipWakes_Lynch_AO_2005.pdf - Turbulent ship wakes:further evidence that the Earth is round.
*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • +1/-2
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: comet
« Reply #9 on: April 09, 2009, 12:11:51 AM »
Quote from: zork on April 09, 2009, 12:09:41 AM
There is also question about how can they move toward UA source when UA must push them away. What is the force that pushes them toward UA source.

They are being accelerated in that direction through their own geodesic at a rate greater than 9.8m/s/s.
Logged
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."
*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • +1/-2
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: comet
« Reply #10 on: April 09, 2009, 12:12:46 AM »
Quote from: NTheGreat on April 08, 2009, 03:56:06 PM
I do wonder where the idea of comets orbiting the Sun in a FE model comes from, though. I didn't know there was anything that suggests the Sun had an attractive force, beyond the slight effect on the planet's tides. But then, shouldn't it be orbiting the Moon? That has a far greater apparent attraction in a FE model.

This is an excellent question, to which I have no answer.
Logged
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."
?

zork

  • 3338
  • +0/-0
Re: comet
« Reply #11 on: April 09, 2009, 12:19:41 AM »
Quote from: Ski on April 09, 2009, 12:11:51 AM
Quote from: zork on April 09, 2009, 12:09:41 AM
There is also question about how can they move toward UA source when UA must push them away. What is the force that pushes them toward UA source.
They are being accelerated in that direction through their own geodesic at a rate greater than 9.8m/s/s.
They are being accelerated by what? Do you speak now in context of FE model or RE model? Because in FE model the sun isn't round and I am quite sure it doesn't have same gravitational properties as in RE model.
Logged
Rowbotham had bad eyesight
-
http://thulescientific.com/Lynch%20Curvature%202008.pdf - Visually discerning the curvature of the Earth
http://thulescientific.com/TurbulentShipWakes_Lynch_AO_2005.pdf - Turbulent ship wakes:further evidence that the Earth is round.
*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • +1/-2
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: comet
« Reply #12 on: April 09, 2009, 12:29:21 AM »
I have no reason to believe the sun is not round.  The planets seem to be subject to the sun's gravitation -- I'm not sure why comets would not be.
Logged
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."
?

zork

  • 3338
  • +0/-0
Re: comet
« Reply #13 on: April 09, 2009, 12:40:25 AM »
 You are now speaking about RE model of solar system and it doesn't fit to FE model. I can't imagine the flat piece of rock called Earth accelerated by UA and at same time orbiting sun.
Logged
Rowbotham had bad eyesight
-
http://thulescientific.com/Lynch%20Curvature%202008.pdf - Visually discerning the curvature of the Earth
http://thulescientific.com/TurbulentShipWakes_Lynch_AO_2005.pdf - Turbulent ship wakes:further evidence that the Earth is round.
*

Euclid

  • 942
  • +1/-0
Re: comet
« Reply #14 on: April 09, 2009, 02:59:17 AM »
Quote from: zork on April 09, 2009, 12:40:25 AM
You are now speaking about RE model of solar system and it doesn't fit to FE model. I can't imagine the flat piece of rock called Earth accelerated by UA and at same time orbiting sun.

The Earth isn't a planet.  It doesn't orbit the Sun in any FE model.
Logged
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist
Yes, thanks to the tireless efforts of Euclid and a few other mathematically-inclined members, electromagnetic acceleration is fast moving into the forefront of FE research.
8)
?

NTheGreat

  • 1019
  • +0/-0
Re: comet
« Reply #15 on: April 09, 2009, 05:59:08 AM »
Quote
The planets seem to be subject to the sun's gravitation -- I'm not sure why comets would not be.

What aspect of a planet's motion, especially that of a superior planet, suggests it's orbiting the Sun when considered from a FE model view?
Logged
*

klanu

  • 19
  • +0/-0
Re: comet
« Reply #16 on: April 09, 2009, 08:10:56 AM »
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on April 08, 2009, 12:14:26 PM
But nothing orbits the sun on the flat earth model! Do you have any proof of this satanic slander?!

Not true.[/quote]

Can you explain how planets work under a flat earth? In particular phases of venus, visible by any amateur astronomer, which reflect the light of the sun, so giving the location of the sun...
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »