Consciousness

  • 92 Replies
  • 21183 Views
?

Proleg

Re: Consciousness
« Reply #30 on: April 08, 2009, 10:43:15 AM »
Never done drugs beyond tobbacco. Not through puritanism, just never been around them and never bothered to seek them out.
Where I live, they find you eventually.

*

optimisticcynic

  • 2194
  • +0/-0
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #31 on: April 08, 2009, 11:06:52 AM »
It also is a great anti-anxiety medication. Once I learned how to cope with the occasional bouts of paranoia, it actually makes a very effective anti-depressant/anxiety treatment.
But I stopped taking anti-anxiety, and don't want to take them ever again. I want to get by on my own mind. I may have problems but I want to do it on my own.
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

?

Anteater7171

  • 9408
  • +0/-0
  • I am the FAQ!!!
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #32 on: April 08, 2009, 01:09:38 PM »
It also is a great anti-anxiety medication. Once I learned how to cope with the occasional bouts of paranoia, it actually makes a very effective anti-depressant/anxiety treatment.
But I stopped taking anti-anxiety, and don't want to take them ever again. I want to get by on my own mind. I may have problems but I want to do it on my own.
That's a good thing to aspire too.

Never done drugs beyond tobbacco. Not through puritanism, just never been around them and never bothered to seek them out.
Where I live, they find you eventually.
Here in Ca, literally 80% of the people I know, have smoked at least once. 30% Probably smoke pot regularly. it's part of the culture and unavoidable.
I don't remember anything. Well, I do, but it's really vague. Like I was on drugs the whole time.

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #33 on: April 08, 2009, 05:37:58 PM »
Just say no Mmm'kay?

Here let me sing you a little song to help you remember...

*piano music starts*

There are times when you get suckered in
By drugs and alchohol and sex with women-mmkay
But its when you do these things too much
That you've become an addict and must get back in touch
You can do it Its all up to you-mmmmmkay
With a little plan you can change your life tooo-day
You dont have to spend your life addicted to smack
Homeless on the streets giving handjobs for crack
Follow my plan and very soon you will see-eeyy, its easy mmkay

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #34 on: April 08, 2009, 08:45:47 PM »
I'd say consciousness is simply being aware. Being aware is basically processing data. My computer processes data but not anything external to what it is fed. My computer is only conscious and sees of COD4, as much as I am conscious and see what is in my room. The most significant difference being that I comprehend. Comprehension could be recognizing patterns and having background knowledge. This is also achievable by computers.

I'd love it if someone could define consciousness in such a way that it could not be applied to a computer.

I recall that VenomfangX once said that consciousness is essentially a term for the soul as it is using the brain. (The brain connects the soul and body.) While I'm spouting out challenges, I might as well ask for creationists who are prolife to apply a definition that fits an embryo.
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

*

optimisticcynic

  • 2194
  • +0/-0
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #35 on: April 08, 2009, 09:00:37 PM »
I'd say consciousness is simply being aware. Being aware is basically processing data. My computer processes data but not anything external to what it is fed. My computer is only conscious and sees of COD4, as much as I am conscious and see what is in my room. The most significant difference being that I comprehend. Comprehension could be recognizing patterns and having background knowledge. This is also achievable by computers.

I'd love it if someone could define consciousness in such a way that it could not be applied to a computer.

I recall that VenomfangX once said that consciousness is essentially a term for the soul as it is using the brain. (The brain connects the soul and body.) While I'm spouting out challenges, I might as well ask for creationists who are prolife to apply a definition that fits an embryo.
I am sorry am. I am having trouble verbalizing what I have figured out.
a Computer proses the information that represents the picture of COD4. However when I see my hand There is a consciousness in seeing it. if we were a thing of dominoes, chemical reaction after chemical reaction, there would not be an image in my mind. there might be the information but I would not have that image in my mind. keep in mind I am trying to verbalize something That really can't be verbalized. I am just trying to get you close enough you can find it yourself. Now the problem is it is impossible for me to know if any one else is conscious or a set of dominoes. I apolise if it seems like a stupid argument. Trust me, if you understood what I was thinking it would make sense.
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #36 on: April 08, 2009, 09:11:14 PM »
If we were a thing of dominoes, chemical reaction after chemical reaction, there would not be an image in my mind.
Why not? What part of an image is not something that can't be replaced by machine? (A camera in this instance).

Quote
there might be the information but I would not have that image in my mind.
If you process the information to compile an image, and then interpret it you would...

Quote
keep in mind I am trying to verbalize something That really can't be verbalized. I am just trying to get you close enough you can find it yourself.
I used to believe in a consciousness that is linked to something beyond the physical, but I now believe that it can't be verbalized because it doesn't exist. It is intuition that makes us reach for that.

Quote
Now the problem is it is impossible for me to know if any one else is conscious or a set of dominoes. I apologize if it seems like a stupid argument. Trust me, if you understood what I was thinking it would make sense.
I have had that thought process myself, so I think I do understand.
« Last Edit: April 08, 2009, 09:13:50 PM by ﮎingulaЯiτy »
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #37 on: April 08, 2009, 09:17:17 PM »
Physical objects influence physical objects. Something nonphysical, like a concept, cannot influence something physical. If a soul did exist as something beyond the physical plane of existence, how could it influence something physical?
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

?

Anteater7171

  • 9408
  • +0/-0
  • I am the FAQ!!!
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #38 on: April 08, 2009, 09:22:37 PM »
ﮎingulaЯiτy, at what point do you believe a computer becomes, fully conscious?


Also I thought of another weird question that falls in here. If one were to go through a teleporter (the Startrek kind, dissembles you then a machine reassembles you out of different atoms in another location) would you be the same conscious entity that entered, once you come out?
I don't remember anything. Well, I do, but it's really vague. Like I was on drugs the whole time.

*

optimisticcynic

  • 2194
  • +0/-0
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #39 on: April 08, 2009, 09:28:18 PM »

Quote
there might be the information but I would not have that image in my mind.
If you process the information to compile an image, and then interpret it you would...

I am trying to say having the information is different and processing it would be different then seeing it. yes we process it to but we also see it. Again I may not be understandable.
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #40 on: April 08, 2009, 09:31:23 PM »
I am trying to say having the information is different and processing it would be different then seeing it. yes we process it to but we also see it. Again I may not be understandable.
It sounds as if you are trying to describe the sensation of perception.
But I still think that it is purely chemical and mechanical processes giving us sensations and perceptions.
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #41 on: April 08, 2009, 09:34:26 PM »
ﮎingulaЯiτy, at what point do you believe a computer becomes, fully conscious?
I think consciousness is a continuum so "fully conscious" is hard to answer.  :-\
I'll try if you narrow down the terms of the question.

Unfortunately, I plan to format my computer tonight. So my answer might be delayed unless I go to the library or something.

Quote
Also I thought of another weird question that falls in here. If one were to go through a teleporter (the Startrek kind, dissembles you then a machine reassembles you out of different atoms in another location) would you be the same conscious entity that entered, once you come out?
I think that that you would be the same conscious entity, even if the atoms and molecules were different ones used to construct you on the other side. If you could rig it to duplicate people, I think both people would be the same entity. Both should have the same rights to possessions they acquired before duplicating.
« Last Edit: April 08, 2009, 09:36:50 PM by ﮎingulaЯiτy »
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

*

optimisticcynic

  • 2194
  • +0/-0
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #42 on: April 09, 2009, 01:38:49 PM »
I am trying to say having the information is different and processing it would be different then seeing it. yes we process it to but we also see it. Again I may not be understandable.
It sounds as if you are trying to describe the sensation of perception.
But I still think that it is purely chemical and mechanical processes giving us sensations and perceptions.
okay I am not sure if you understood what I was saying or not. However I can think of no other way of explaining it so I am going to pretend I am sure you understood it.
I would like to say I have seen enough to there is something more then my body here. does this mean I believe in an aftrer life? no but I do believe based on logic and what I have seen that we have something more then a chemical interaction. Right now using logic Buddhism seems the most likely to be true, However I do not agree with it completely. Hopefully we will find out what is next after death.
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

*

Benocrates

  • 3072
  • +0/-0
  • Canadian Philosopher
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #43 on: April 09, 2009, 02:12:25 PM »
I like Sartre's concept of the intentional consciousness (Hegelean idea) as being nothingness. The human mind is both nothing and everything.
Quote from: President Barack Obama
Pot had helped
Get the fuck over it.

*

Masterchef

  • 3894
  • +0/-0
  • Rabble rabble rabble
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #44 on: April 10, 2009, 02:18:23 AM »
Am I the only one here that has not smoked something?
I've never smoked anything. Alcohol is my preferred method of killing braincells.

And killing braincells can completely change someones personality. If the consciousness was some outside entity that could not be damaged, how would that be possible? Sure, you can claim that the brain is just a vessel through which the soul communicates with the body, but given what we know about the brain, is a soul even necessary? Is there any evidence that souls exists? Is there anything to suggest that existence of a soul is even possible?

*

Masterchef

  • 3894
  • +0/-0
  • Rabble rabble rabble
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #45 on: April 10, 2009, 02:52:07 AM »
I am sorry am. I am having trouble verbalizing what I have figured out.
a Computer proses the information that represents the picture of COD4. However when I see my hand There is a consciousness in seeing it. if we were a thing of dominoes, chemical reaction after chemical reaction, there would not be an image in my mind. there might be the information but I would not have that image in my mind.
I'm not quite sure that I know what you are trying to say.

The way a computer displays an image is not that different from the way your brain displays an image to you. Your brain does a lot of stuff in the background that you are not aware of. One of those things is taking information in the form of electrical signals, sent to it from your eyes, and turning it into an image that you "see". This is pretty much exactly what the computer does. To the computer, the images that you see on your monitor are nothing more than binary code.

So really, your brain doesn't need anything other than the information for you to see things.

*

optimisticcynic

  • 2194
  • +0/-0
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #46 on: April 10, 2009, 08:07:26 AM »
I am sorry am. I am having trouble verbalizing what I have figured out.
a Computer proses the information that represents the picture of COD4. However when I see my hand There is a consciousness in seeing it. if we were a thing of dominoes, chemical reaction after chemical reaction, there would not be an image in my mind. there might be the information but I would not have that image in my mind.
I'm not quite sure that I know what you are trying to say.

The way a computer displays an image is not that different from the way your brain displays an image to you. Your brain does a lot of stuff in the background that you are not aware of. One of those things is taking information in the form of electrical signals, sent to it from your eyes, and turning it into an image that you "see". This is pretty much exactly what the computer does. To the computer, the images that you see on your monitor are nothing more than binary code.

So really, your brain doesn't need anything other than the information for you to see things.
I am saying without a there being something more then the body we could have all the information about the object, But we wouldn't see the image. when a computer sees an image it processes it but it can not actually see it. And that is the last I am going to say on the topic. I am giving up trying to verbalize this.
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Planar Moderator
  • 52333
  • +97/-88
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #47 on: April 10, 2009, 09:13:53 AM »
Are you saying the computer would need to be self aware in order to see the image?
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13115
  • +0/-0
  • swiggity swooty
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #48 on: April 10, 2009, 09:40:01 AM »
Are you saying the computer would need to be self aware in order to see the image?

Only to understand it and interpret it as a human might, more than just face value. Style, mood, temperature, etc.

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Planar Moderator
  • 52333
  • +97/-88
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #49 on: April 10, 2009, 10:16:51 AM »
Do you think a soul is required for that?  I kinda think he's saying that we couldn't have intuition without a soul.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

?

Anteater7171

  • 9408
  • +0/-0
  • I am the FAQ!!!
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #50 on: April 10, 2009, 11:46:46 AM »
Do you think a soul is required for that?  I kinda think he's saying that we couldn't have intuition without a soul.
I think he is too.
I don't remember anything. Well, I do, but it's really vague. Like I was on drugs the whole time.

*

optimisticcynic

  • 2194
  • +0/-0
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #51 on: April 10, 2009, 12:40:43 PM »
More similar to I think therefor I am. although no exactly.
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #52 on: April 22, 2009, 04:46:51 PM »
Am I the only one here that has not smoked something?
Never smoked anything, nor have I ever had any alcoholic beverages.

Do you think a soul is required for that?  I kinda think he's saying that we couldn't have intuition without a soul.
Do you agree with that? If so, how do you define intuition?
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

*

optimisticcynic

  • 2194
  • +0/-0
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #53 on: April 22, 2009, 04:51:27 PM »

quote author=Space Cowgirl link=topic=28135.msg670389#msg670389 date=1239383811]
Do you think a soul is required for that?  I kinda think he's saying that we couldn't have intuition without a soul.
Do you agree with that? If so, how do you define intuition?
[/quote]

No it is more that without a soul I could react to pain but I could not feel it. To an observer it would be impossible to tell the difference however I know I feel pain.

God that was a terrible try at explaining it. If you can figure out what I am saying good for you.

Dammit I wasn't supposed to argue this anymore.

Lastly I am not necessary talking about a Christin version of a soul.

Am I the only one here that has not smoked something?
Never smoked anything, nor have I ever had any alcoholic beverages.

Huh I didn't think there was any one on this sight besides me that hadn't Although I did have one sip of wine at confirmation. I really don't consider that drinking an alcoholic beverage.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2009, 04:54:46 PM by optimisticcynic »
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #54 on: April 22, 2009, 06:57:23 PM »
Do you think a soul is required for that?  I kinda think he's saying that we couldn't have intuition without a soul.
Do you agree with that? If so, how do you define intuition?

No it is more that without a soul I could react to pain but I could not feel it. To an observer it would be impossible to tell the difference however I know I feel pain.
Why? Is this based on intuition or is there a reason you believe this?

God that was a terrible try at explaining it. If you can figure out what I am saying good for you.
It sounds as if you are trying to describe a sensation from perception.
Am I close?


Huh I didn't think there was any one on this sight besides me that hadn't Although I did have one sip of wine at confirmation. I really don't consider that drinking an alcoholic beverage.

Nah, yours doesn't count. On second thought, I am WINNING by one sip.  :D
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

*

optimisticcynic

  • 2194
  • +0/-0
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #55 on: April 22, 2009, 07:05:02 PM »
Do you think a soul is required for that?  I kinda think he's saying that we couldn't have intuition without a soul.
Do you agree with that? If so, how do you define intuition?

No it is more that without a soul I could react to pain but I could not feel it. To an observer it would be impossible to tell the difference however I know I feel pain.
Why? Is this based on intuition or is there a reason you believe this?
the reason is no mater the reaction it is composed of objects that due not feel. when you add them together the should not suddenly develop that ability. yet we have it. Wow that was a bad explanation this is really hard to explain.

God that was a terrible try at explaining it. If you can figure out what I am saying good for you.
It sounds as if you are trying to describe a sensation from perception.
Am I close?
close

Huh I didn't think there was any one on this sight besides me that hadn't Although I did have one sip of wine at confirmation. I really don't consider that drinking an alcoholic beverage.

Nah, yours doesn't count. On second thought, I am WINNING by one sip.  :D
dammit. I also walked into the bathrooms in my high school, which had enough smoke to to make it as though you were smoking directly from a joint.
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

?

Proleg

Re: Consciousness
« Reply #56 on: April 22, 2009, 08:05:15 PM »
Turns out ﮎingulaЯiτy is a bigger moralfag than our KKKristians. ::)

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #57 on: April 22, 2009, 08:14:41 PM »
Turns out ﮎingulaЯiτy is a bigger moralfag than our KKKristians. ::)
I don't do anything to compromise my rationality or poison my system. Make fun all you want.   ;)

Tell ya what, I wrote an article on just one of the many effects of drinking to get drunk back when I was 10 or something. I'll post it.

Go read:
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=28495.0
« Last Edit: April 22, 2009, 08:24:16 PM by ﮎingulaЯiτy »
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

?

Proleg

Re: Consciousness
« Reply #58 on: April 22, 2009, 08:22:39 PM »
Turns out ﮎingulaЯiτy is a bigger moralfag than our KKKristians. ::)
I don't do anything to compromise my rationality or poison my system. Make fun all you want.   ;)

Tell ya what, I wrote an article on just one of the many effects of drinking to get drunk beck when I was 9 or something. I'll post it.
If you're so rational, you'll have realized by now that life is an absurd clusterfuck of chemical reactions. Why shouldn't the sensations we feel be pleasant and relaxing ones?

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Consciousness
« Reply #59 on: April 22, 2009, 08:26:44 PM »
If you're so rational, you'll have realized by now that life is an absurd clusterfuck of chemical reactions. Why shouldn't the sensations we feel be pleasant and relaxing ones?
Binge drinking is nothing more than seeking instant gratification at the expense of your health and mind. The sensation is temporary, but the costs are permanent.
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.