« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Antarctica.

  • 42 Replies
  • 13683 Views
?

daz

  • 31
  • +0/-0
Re: Antarctica.
« Reply #30 on: April 19, 2009, 01:46:43 PM »
Nothing is explained properly! Absolutely everything is left at a loose end, because of the fact there is absolutely no proof!

All you have are people saying things.

No photographs, no scientific basis, nothing.

This site doesn't go over my head, however what i can't understand is the fact there is no proof, and no matter where you go with your claims, you cannot get past the fact that there is no proof.
Logged
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Antarctica.
« Reply #31 on: April 19, 2009, 03:32:46 PM »
Quote from: daz on April 19, 2009, 01:46:43 PM
Nothing is explained properly! Absolutely everything is left at a loose end, because of the fact there is absolutely no proof!

All you have are people saying things.

No photographs, no scientific basis, nothing.

This site doesn't go over my head, however what i can't understand is the fact there is no proof, and no matter where you go with your claims, you cannot get past the fact that there is no proof.

What does proof have to do with it?  You can't prove your theory either.  I'm not on any mission here to prove anything.
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
?

daz

  • 31
  • +0/-0
Re: Antarctica.
« Reply #32 on: April 20, 2009, 04:10:01 AM »
There is proof of a round Earth, bucketloads and bucketloads of proof. So much so that it is fact.

Why do you believe it to be true? Surely a smart man would require scientific basis before making any kind of judgement?
Logged
*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: Antarctica.
« Reply #33 on: April 20, 2009, 12:48:10 PM »
Quote
There is proof of a round Earth, bucketloads and bucketloads of proof. So much so that it is fact.

Really? Where can I find a book which proves through experiment that the earth is a globe?

Quote
Why do you believe it to be true? Surely a smart man would require scientific basis before making any kind of judgement?

There is a well established scientific basis. Consult the library of resources in my signature link.
Logged
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45133
  • +92/-135
Re: Antarctica.
« Reply #34 on: April 20, 2009, 01:02:44 PM »
Quote from: Tom Bishop on April 20, 2009, 12:48:10 PM
Quote
There is proof of a round Earth, bucketloads and bucketloads of proof. So much so that it is fact.

Really? Where can I find a book which proves through experiment that the earth is a globe?

http://books.google.com/books?q=geodesy&btnG=Search+Books

What's wrong Tom, didn't they cover that in your geophysics course?
« Last Edit: April 20, 2009, 01:07:28 PM by markjo »
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: Antarctica.
« Reply #35 on: April 20, 2009, 03:16:07 PM »
Quote from: markjo on April 20, 2009, 01:02:44 PM
http://books.google.com/books?q=geodesy&btnG=Search+Books

What's wrong Tom, didn't they cover that in your geophysics course?

Where does anyone conduct an experiment to determine the shape of the earth? Sending a submarine to the bottom of the ocean to map features and sending someone to survey some mountains doesn't tell me anything about the earth's shape.
Logged
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45133
  • +92/-135
Re: Antarctica.
« Reply #36 on: April 20, 2009, 04:55:14 PM »
Quote from: Tom Bishop on April 20, 2009, 03:16:07 PM
Quote from: markjo on April 20, 2009, 01:02:44 PM
http://books.google.com/books?q=geodesy&btnG=Search+Books

What's wrong Tom, didn't they cover that in your geophysics course?

Where does anyone conduct an experiment to determine the shape of the earth? Sending a submarine to the bottom of the ocean to map features and sending someone to survey some mountains doesn't tell me anything about the earth's shape.

Geodesy (the study of the size and form of the earth) is a branch of geophysics.  Geodesic surveys have been conducted to determine shape of the earth, and that shape was found to be an oblate spheroid.  But as a geologist, you would already know that.
Quote from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_geodesy#Scientific_revolution
The French Academy of Sciences dispatched two expeditions. One expedition under Pierre Louis Maupertuis (1736-37) was sent to Lapland (as far North as possible). The second mission under Pierre Bouguer was sent to what is modern-day Ecuador, near the equator (1735-44).

The measurements conclusively showed that the earth was oblate, with a ratio of 1:210. Thus the next approximation to the true figure of the Earth after the sphere became the oblong ellipsoid of revolution.
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Antarctica.
« Reply #37 on: April 20, 2009, 06:07:54 PM »
Quote from: daz on April 20, 2009, 04:10:01 AM
There is proof of a round Earth, bucketloads and bucketloads of proof.

I haven't seen any.
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
*

DD2014

  • 60
  • +0/-0
Re: Antarctica.
« Reply #38 on: April 22, 2009, 12:50:18 PM »
Quote from: Tom Bishop on April 20, 2009, 03:16:07 PM
Quote from: markjo on April 20, 2009, 01:02:44 PM
http://books.google.com/books?q=geodesy&btnG=Search+Books

What's wrong Tom, didn't they cover that in your geophysics course?

Where does anyone conduct an experiment to determine the shape of the earth? Sending a submarine to the bottom of the ocean to map features and sending someone to survey some mountains doesn't tell me anything about the earth's shape.

Actually it does Tom. Its called GPS
Logged
I am from NASA, and I am here to disinform you...
?

A Physicist

  • 31
  • +0/-0
Re: Antarctica.
« Reply #39 on: April 23, 2009, 05:10:00 PM »
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on April 20, 2009, 06:07:54 PM
Quote from: daz on April 20, 2009, 04:10:01 AM
There is proof of a round Earth, bucketloads and bucketloads of proof.

I haven't seen any.



Horizon.
Logged
?

Henrythecamel

  • 47
  • +0/-0
Re: Antarctica.
« Reply #40 on: April 23, 2009, 06:24:01 PM »
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on April 02, 2009, 05:34:49 PM
How's this: proof is important to you, not me.

lol that about sums it up..
Logged
?

caelan96

  • 41
  • +0/-0
Re: Antarctica.
« Reply #41 on: May 08, 2009, 03:28:25 PM »
Quote from: Ragnarr on March 31, 2009, 08:20:40 AM
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on March 30, 2009, 07:18:09 PM
Nobody here denies that people have been to the Ice Wall.

Agreed, however FE does deny the existence of 24 hour daylight in Antarctica.

Clearly you have never been to the poles. Maybe you should listen to someone who has.
Logged
*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Antarctica.
« Reply #42 on: May 08, 2009, 07:32:10 PM »
Quote from: caelan96 on May 08, 2009, 03:28:25 PM
Quote from: Ragnarr on March 31, 2009, 08:20:40 AM
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on March 30, 2009, 07:18:09 PM
Nobody here denies that people have been to the Ice Wall.

Agreed, however FE does deny the existence of 24 hour daylight in Antarctica.

Clearly you have never been to the poles. Maybe you should listen to someone who has.

Like who?  And what exactly does it show?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »