Time to improve the content to spam ratio of this thread.
*ahem*
As any amateur astronomer knows, the stars orbit the South Celestial Poles in the opposite direction to that in which they orbit the North Celestial Pole. The only way that this is possible in FET is if there is some line where the stars converge and then subsequently diverge, which happens to be the Celestial Equator.
Now, there are three major landmasses in the southern hemiplane, and each sees the same constellations. Therefore, there must be at least three South Celestial Poles, each with its own (identical) set of stars, plus a single North Celestial Pole in the centre. This idea is best imagined as a set of "celestial gears" - but try not to take the analogy too far; there is no evidence that the stars are etched onto anything solid that may be termed a "gear".
What you are seeing in that image is merely the point where two of these gears join on the Celestial Equator; on one side, you have the counterclockwise-rotating North Celestial Gear, and on the other you have one of the clockwise-rotating South Celestial Gears. A perfect explanation for why the stars appear to diverge on either end of the photograph.
Now, let us consider the alternative theory. The heavens, according to RET, appear to rotate above us as if a large imaginary sphere - though of course, Round Earthers attribute this bizarre behaviour to the Earth's rotation. This should cause each star to trace out a line of celestial latitude, which - and this is the key part - should be parallel to every other line of celestial latitude. If RET were correct, there would be no divergence in this photograph; all of the lines would be parallel.
The photograph given is clear evidence for a Flat Earth.