Evolution didn't happen

Quote from: Raist on June 23, 2009, 10:48:48 AM

Did he just use a stick of dynamite in a bowling ball as an analogy for the big bang?

I think he did, but not before implying that it was a rock that exploded.

If evolution happened we would see much more redundancy in the animal kingdom. We would see many animals that shared most of their DNA and only had a few differences. On top of this we would see redundant systems in animals, perhaps several organs performing the same function. Humans have no such organs, even the appendix does the job of fighting off bacteria.

If humans evolved from primates wouldn't we see many different kind of monkeys instead of just apes?

Finally, fish do not crawl out of water, there is obviously no fish that can breath air, maybe a "lung fish."

Quote from: Raist on March 12, 2009, 10:28:41 PM

If evolution happened we would see much more redundancy in the animal kingdom. We would see many animals that shared most of their DNA and only had a few differences. On top of this we would see redundant systems in animals, perhaps several organs performing the same function. Humans have no such organs, even the appendix does the job of fighting off bacteria.

If humans evolved from primates wouldn't we see many different kind of monkeys instead of just apes?

Finally, fish do not crawl out of water, there is obviously no fish that can breath air, maybe a "lung fish."

That is a horrible troll.  I love it though.

My two cents:  ToE never made the bolded claim that humans came from primates.

If people came from chimpanzees then how come there aren't any chimps out there birthing people?  It's simply ill conceived.

Quote from: Pongo on June 30, 2009, 06:48:56 PM

If people came from chimpanzees then how come there aren't any chimps out there birthing people?  It's simply ill conceived.

You sir are a boon to the internet. Thank you.

Quote from: Ragnarr on June 30, 2009, 02:42:24 PM

Quote from: Raist on March 12, 2009, 10:28:41 PM

If evolution happened we would see much more redundancy in the animal kingdom. We would see many animals that shared most of their DNA and only had a few differences. On top of this we would see redundant systems in animals, perhaps several organs performing the same function. Humans have no such organs, even the appendix does the job of fighting off bacteria.

If humans evolved from primates wouldn't we see many different kind of monkeys instead of just apes?

Finally, fish do not crawl out of water, there is obviously no fish that can breath air, maybe a "lung fish."

That is a horrible troll.  I love it though.

My two cents:  ToE never made the bolded claim that humans came from primates.

I really don't care what your toe claimed, I'm talking about those darn atheists with their belief in an all powerful time god.

I don't care how long you wait, chimps don't turn into humans. I heard one even say that my little puppy Frishes came from wolves. If you ever met my min pin you'd know she could never take down a deer. What nerve.

If people came from chimpanzees then how come there aren't any chimps out there birthing people?  It's simply ill conceived.

Quote from: Pongo on June 30, 2009, 06:48:56 PM

If people came from chimpanzees then how come there aren't any chimps out there birthing people?  It's simply ill conceived.

and, and, and, if humans came from chimps, why are there sill chimps?  Checkmate!

It's great because of how many times this is actually claimed in serious debates.

Quote from: Raist on June 30, 2009, 05:44:22 PM

Quote from: Ragnarr on June 30, 2009, 02:42:24 PM

Quote from: Raist on March 12, 2009, 10:28:41 PM

If evolution happened we would see much more redundancy in the animal kingdom. We would see many animals that shared most of their DNA and only had a few differences. On top of this we would see redundant systems in animals, perhaps several organs performing the same function. Humans have no such organs, even the appendix does the job of fighting off bacteria.

If humans evolved from primates wouldn't we see many different kind of monkeys instead of just apes?

Finally, fish do not crawl out of water, there is obviously no fish that can breath air, maybe a "lung fish."

That is a horrible troll.  I love it though.

My two cents:  ToE never made the bolded claim that humans came from primates.

I really don't care what your toe claimed, I'm talking about those darn atheists with their belief in an all powerful time god.

I don't care how long you wait, chimps don't turn into humans. I heard one even say that my little puppy Frishes came from wolves. If you ever met my min pin you'd know she could never take down a deer. What nerve.

Theory of Evolution NEVER makes the claim that chimps turn into humans.  Nor does it claim that your puppy Frishes or whatever came from wolves.

Good to see a fellow creationist is here.

Good to see a fellow creationist is here.

I agree, Ragnorr Rocks.

Quote from: Ragnarr on July 01, 2009, 07:47:32 AM

Quote from: Raist on June 30, 2009, 05:44:22 PM

Quote from: Ragnarr on June 30, 2009, 02:42:24 PM

Quote from: Raist on March 12, 2009, 10:28:41 PM

If evolution happened we would see much more redundancy in the animal kingdom. We would see many animals that shared most of their DNA and only had a few differences. On top of this we would see redundant systems in animals, perhaps several organs performing the same function. Humans have no such organs, even the appendix does the job of fighting off bacteria.

If humans evolved from primates wouldn't we see many different kind of monkeys instead of just apes?

Finally, fish do not crawl out of water, there is obviously no fish that can breath air, maybe a "lung fish."

That is a horrible troll.  I love it though.

My two cents:  ToE never made the bolded claim that humans came from primates.

I really don't care what your toe claimed, I'm talking about those darn atheists with their belief in an all powerful time god.

I don't care how long you wait, chimps don't turn into humans. I heard one even say that my little puppy Frishes came from wolves. If you ever met my min pin you'd know she could never take down a deer. What nerve.

Theory of Evolution NEVER makes the claim that chimps turn into humans.  Nor does it claim that your puppy Frishes or whatever came from wolves.

Good to see a fellow creationist is here.

Quote from: Raist on July 01, 2009, 11:55:39 AM

Quote from: Ragnarr on July 01, 2009, 07:47:32 AM

Quote from: Raist on June 30, 2009, 05:44:22 PM

Quote from: Ragnarr on June 30, 2009, 02:42:24 PM

Quote from: Raist on March 12, 2009, 10:28:41 PM

If evolution happened we would see much more redundancy in the animal kingdom. We would see many animals that shared most of their DNA and only had a few differences. On top of this we would see redundant systems in animals, perhaps several organs performing the same function. Humans have no such organs, even the appendix does the job of fighting off bacteria.

If humans evolved from primates wouldn't we see many different kind of monkeys instead of just apes?

Finally, fish do not crawl out of water, there is obviously no fish that can breath air, maybe a "lung fish."

That is a horrible troll.  I love it though.

My two cents:  ToE never made the bolded claim that humans came from primates.

I really don't care what your toe claimed, I'm talking about those darn atheists with their belief in an all powerful time god.

I don't care how long you wait, chimps don't turn into humans. I heard one even say that my little puppy Frishes came from wolves. If you ever met my min pin you'd know she could never take down a deer. What nerve.

Theory of Evolution NEVER makes the claim that chimps turn into humans.  Nor does it claim that your puppy Frishes or whatever came from wolves.

Good to see a fellow creationist is here.

I think the bible is missing a few pages.  God used the mud he breathed on to scour the fur from a chimp/ape to create adam.  Besides the hair/fur, god had to make a few other slight modifications to size, posture, brain size, and the ability to learn and teach, etc.  One of these modifications involved rib removal - which would come in handy later.  Frishes however DID come from wolves as the domesticated dog is only micro evolution/breeding which intelligent design allows.  (I'm sounding more like a FE'er already)

Yes, so mud is the new way to carry genetic information for evolution?

Also, frishes could never take down a moose, now you are being intentionally obtuse.

Quote from: Raist on July 01, 2009, 06:34:34 PM

Yes, so mud is the new way to carry genetic information for evolution?

Also, frishes could never take down a moose, now you are being intentionally obtuse.

The whole dust thing always confused me as i don't seem to be made out of sillicates. lots of hydrogen and carbon and oxygen, but no sillicates.

Quote from: CACTUSJACKmankin on July 01, 2009, 06:50:21 PM

Quote from: Raist on July 01, 2009, 06:34:34 PM

Yes, so mud is the new way to carry genetic information for evolution?

Also, frishes could never take down a moose, now you are being intentionally obtuse.

The whole dust thing always confused me as i don't seem to be made out of sillicates. lots of hydrogen and carbon and oxygen, but no sillicates.

Most dust in your house is made of human skin. So I'd say that dust and people are made of a very similar composition.

Quote from: Raist on July 01, 2009, 06:51:28 PM

Most dust in your house is made of human skin.

Most dust on the ground is sillicates, like sand.

Quote from: Raist on July 01, 2009, 06:51:28 PM

Quote from: CACTUSJACKmankin on July 01, 2009, 06:50:21 PM

Quote from: Raist on July 01, 2009, 06:34:34 PM

Yes, so mud is the new way to carry genetic information for evolution?

Also, frishes could never take down a moose, now you are being intentionally obtuse.

The whole dust thing always confused me as i don't seem to be made out of sillicates. lots of hydrogen and carbon and oxygen, but no sillicates.

Most dust in your house is made of human skin. So I'd say that dust and people are made of a very similar composition.

hello chicken, i'm egg.
Most dust on the ground is sillicates, like sand.

There is no reason to having more than one organ doing the same thing, therefor, if evolution didn't happen there would be redundancy.

There is no reason to having more than one organ doing the same thing, therefor, if evolution didn't happen there would be redundancy.

Quote from: theory_Revolution on July 10, 2009, 01:16:39 AM

There is no reason to having more than one organ doing the same thing, therefor, if evolution didn't happen there would be redundancy.

So, the kidneys prove evolution wrong, we have two and only need one. Testicles can both do the work on their own, so more redundancy, The appendix does a little immune system work and a few redundant tasks, so it also disproves evolution. Two different parts of your brain handle the inputs from your eyes, one consciously the other subconsciously, if you don't believe that, some stroke victims go completely blind, but can still catch a ball that is thrown at them or interpret someone's facial expression.

So this redundancy proves that evolution is a lie, thank you.

Quote from: Raist on July 10, 2009, 10:12:17 AM

Quote from: theory_Revolution on July 10, 2009, 01:16:39 AM

There is no reason to having more than one organ doing the same thing, therefor, if evolution didn't happen there would be redundancy.

So, the kidneys prove evolution wrong, we have two and only need one. Testicles can both do the work on their own, so more redundancy, The appendix does a little immune system work and a few redundant tasks, so it also disproves evolution. Two different parts of your brain handle the inputs from your eyes, one consciously the other subconsciously, if you don't believe that, some stroke victims go completely blind, but can still catch a ball that is thrown at them or interpret someone's facial expression.

So this redundancy proves that evolution is a lie, thank you.

Im confuzed, evolution didnt happen because we have organs that do useless things?
Their called vestigal organs. We have them because in the past we needed them, but evolved to the state where their useless. Since them being there or not doesnt affect us at all, we never evolved out of them.

Quote from: theory_Revolution on July 10, 2009, 01:16:39 AM

There is no reason to having more than one organ doing the same thing, therefor, if evolution didn't happen there would be redundancy.

So it's bad to have 2 kidneys?

Quote from: Sexual Harassment Panda on July 10, 2009, 01:26:55 AM

Quote from: theory_Revolution on July 10, 2009, 01:16:39 AM

There is no reason to having more than one organ doing the same thing, therefor, if evolution didn't happen there would be redundancy.

So it's bad to have 2 kidneys?

funny you should mention 2 kidneys you dont need both of them...of all the organs you do not need both of them, even the lungs.