Wardogg, please read these sentence carefully.
A theory does not explain what happens. It explains a mechanism for how it happened. Evolution makes 0 claims whatsoever about what has happened in the past.
This theory doesn't explain anything. It makes large guesses, and molds some actual occurrences in to fit its assumption.
Question: Where did man come from if he didn't come from God?
Assumption: He must have mutated his way up the food chain from single celled organism which we can't prove either.
This is what I hear and see with all this evidence and proof you provide and the really funny thing over the last couple of posts I used the evolutionist links. Not even the .org and creationist sites I usually pull from.
Wrong, it makes predictions. The phylogenetic chart of life is constantly being added too, we do not have all of the pieces, but every new species or fossil we find we can add it to the existing tree. Evolution makes a prediction of what we should find on this tree, ie: transitional forms, ever increasing complex traits in organisms, common ancestry. Every new find is tested against these predictions and it passes with flying colors. For example, we would not expect to find a cretaceous primate, or a Cambrian shark. Apes are evolved from old world monkeys, therefore we would not expect to find a gorrilla that existed before old world monkeys.
So far every fossil we have found is exactly where evolution predicts it would be, verified through the fossil record, geology, genetics etc. I will say it again, we will never find 100 percent proof of evolution as you keep insisting on, instead, we study the facts and ensure that every new fact we find is consistent with what evolution predicts, this will continue until we find something that is not consistent with evolutionary predictions.
Creationism's problem is that it makes no predictions, it is untestable, and relies on arguments of ignorance (god of the gaps) to explain what we do not yet know. If we find two fossils several million years apart, and it is determined that they have common features and therefore are related, but the newer fossil has additional traits that the older did not have, then evolution predicts that somewhere we should find a fossil that is halfway between the two. Creationist will insist that because we haven't found it yet, then evolution is false, and God created these creatures separately. Then, as paleontologists have many times now, a transitional fossil is found, the evolutionary prediction is proven true, but creationist will then point out that there are now two transitional gaps, between the first and second, and between the second and third fossil, and claim that we are losing ground. Ignoring the fact that a prediction evolution has made was verified, as it will always continue to be verified as we find more, that is why evolution will never be proven 100 percent, because that would assume we know everything, which is impossible. What you should be asking, is anything predicted by evolution ever been wrong.
Creationism makes no predictions, there is no evidence to support it, and there is no way to test it, instead it relies on strawmen regarding what evolution predicts, and ignorance (God of the gaps) arguments regarding the things scientists have not found yet. That is why the scientific community does not accept creationism.