High altitude aerial photographs.

  • 41 Replies
  • 17801 Views
Re: High altitude aerial photographs.
« Reply #30 on: May 07, 2009, 07:05:40 AM »
i see it as.. think of the earth like a boob its not flat (in most cases) a boob is like the earth with a nipple on top :)

Re: High altitude aerial photographs.
« Reply #31 on: May 07, 2009, 07:19:59 AM »
No, only a few hundred need to know, and most of those are just paid off and not among those controlling the balance of power. If you follow a compass far enough, you'll soon find that you're traveling perpendicular to the direction you started. Should you bear south long enough, you'll end up sailing around the perimeter of the ice wall, and as you know, it's only possible to spend so long doing this before you need to head home or risk dying of exposure. Likewise, aircraft navigation, even navigation on foot or in a car provides the illusion of a linear magnetic field, when in fact it's more of an unstable spiral.

The few astronauts that have been high enough to see the surface could well have been convinced that they were in fact seeing a sphere and not a cylinder, but nevertheless, these people will have been paid off. The people guarding the icewall need not know what they're guarding, only that they will surely perish if they stray too far from their post. Technicians maintaining the radio systems that pass for satellite transceivers also have no idea of their real purpose.

Just a few, select persons know the full story, the rest is on a 'need to know' basis where they have just the bare details needed to, say, direct the Perimeter Defense and Control.

Re: High altitude aerial photographs.
« Reply #32 on: May 07, 2009, 08:48:09 AM »
It wouldn't take more than a few hundred people to hide the truth. And most believe this to be a conspiracy to keep power and wealth than another more sinister motive. Keep it simple: if people continue to think the world is round, NASA and defense agencies can profit wildly from their programs, it confuses developing nations and keeps the balance of power within the technologically developed nations.

Knowledge is power. Power is a thing the conspirators want to keep.
How does a belief that the Earth is round inhibit a developing nation in any way?

Re: High altitude aerial photographs.
« Reply #33 on: May 07, 2009, 12:00:08 PM »
Quote
Any experiments that are supposed to prove the Earth is flat will be easy enough to criticize.

Got that right. Especially when experiments to show the earth is round are pretty easy to reproduce.

Sorry, my mistake, I meant to say "any experiments designed to prove that the earth is round will be easy enough to criticize. Although this doesn't mean I'm not willing to discuss old school opinions about disproving why the earth is flat. For example, why does altitude never change on a supposedly round planet?

Re: High altitude aerial photographs.
« Reply #34 on: May 07, 2009, 12:03:58 PM »
It wouldn't take more than a few hundred people to hide the truth. And most believe this to be a conspiracy to keep power and wealth than another more sinister motive. Keep it simple: if people continue to think the world is round, NASA and defense agencies can profit wildly from their programs, it confuses developing nations and keeps the balance of power within the technologically developed nations.

Knowledge is power. Power is a thing the conspirators want to keep.
How does a belief that the Earth is round inhibit a developing nation in any way?
How are you supposed to develop guidance systems in you don't even know the shape of the planet? There's a reason the first long range weapons used inertial guidance, and there's a reason the Global Positioning System everybody uses was designed and implemented by NASA and the US Army. Most people don't even realize that a compass will lead you around in circles.

The Earth being round is one of just many lies they tell us, but possibly the most shocking.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42905
Re: High altitude aerial photographs.
« Reply #35 on: May 07, 2009, 01:04:56 PM »
For example, why does altitude never change on a supposedly round planet?

???  Please elaborate.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

Re: High altitude aerial photographs.
« Reply #36 on: May 07, 2009, 02:28:33 PM »
As you travel over the curved surface, why does your measured altitude not change? Surely if you charted your course it should show an arc, or even a complete circle? The fact that sea level remains constant is further proof the Earth is flat.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42905
Re: High altitude aerial photographs.
« Reply #37 on: May 07, 2009, 03:21:11 PM »
As you travel over the curved surface, why does your measured altitude not change? Surely if you charted your course it should show an arc, or even a complete circle? The fact that sea level remains constant is further proof the Earth is flat.

Who said that sea level remains constant?
Quote from: http://www.flatrock.org.nz/topics/environment/poseidon_adventure.htm
The use of satellites equipped with altimetry instruments (particularly the Topex/Poseidon satellites) has revealed a sea level profile that hardly was guessed at before the advent of satellites.  Instead of finding a mean sea level applicable everywhere and modulated only by tides and weather, we find instead that the mean Zero Point of the Sea actually can be different from place to place, and differ by several feet in some instances.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

Re: High altitude aerial photographs.
« Reply #38 on: May 07, 2009, 04:50:03 PM »
Quote
As you travel over the curved surface, why does your measured altitude not change? Surely if you charted your course it should show an arc, or even a complete circle? The fact that sea level remains constant is further proof the Earth is flat.

Planes don't fly in perfectly straight lines.

*

W

  • 2293
Re: High altitude aerial photographs.
« Reply #39 on: May 07, 2009, 04:54:42 PM »
Quote
As you travel over the curved surface, why does your measured altitude not change? Surely if you charted your course it should show an arc, or even a complete circle? The fact that sea level remains constant is further proof the Earth is flat.

Planes don't fly in perfectly straight lines.

Also, circles are never perfect so we can never know the turth.

Oh, dear lord, can someone please get this girl (?) a spell checker?
If you say that the earth is flat, you are destroying centuries of evolution.

Re: High altitude aerial photographs.
« Reply #40 on: May 07, 2009, 06:12:19 PM »
You cannot, absolutely cannot see the supposed "curvature" of the earth below about 65,000 ft.  Sorry its a fact.

If it is a fact, then surely you can prove it. Please do so.

I must admit: I find your certainty puzzling. You claim you do not believe the earth is round, yet you categorically claim to know an absolute height, for certain, at which the Earth's supposed curvature can be seen. How can you know the Earth is flat but also know a certain height at which Earth's curvature can supposedly be seen? Those two ideas clash harshly. Care to explain your reasoning? If not, does any other Flat Earth Spokesman care to explain?

Shit, I think somebody just got badly owned...

*

W

  • 2293
Re: High altitude aerial photographs.
« Reply #41 on: May 07, 2009, 06:39:49 PM »
You cannot, absolutely cannot see the supposed "curvature" of the earth below about 65,000 ft.  Sorry its a fact.

If it is a fact, then surely you can prove it. Please do so.

I must admit: I find your certainty puzzling. You claim you do not believe the earth is round, yet you categorically claim to know an absolute height, for certain, at which the Earth's supposed curvature can be seen. How can you know the Earth is flat but also know a certain height at which Earth's curvature can supposedly be seen? Those two ideas clash harshly. Care to explain your reasoning? If not, does any other Flat Earth Spokesman care to explain?

Shit, I think somebody just got badly owned...

Not really. Read his response. He explains himself very well.
If you say that the earth is flat, you are destroying centuries of evolution.