And have you actually seen a plat earth from space? How do you know for sure the exact shape of it?
Well its definitely not round. And a triangle-shaped Earth? That's just retarded. So it must be flat. There you go.
Well its definitely not flat. And a triangle-shaped Earth? That's just retarded. So it must be round. There you go.
i can sail from america to asia and back around to america
That was a joke, albeit a bad one. I actually don't believe in FET. I just happen think people should understand the theory before they bash it.
its not a theory. a theory has mounds of evidence backing it while this has a few ideas and some random books. following the ways of the higher ups of this idea of a flat earth im going to pick apart your words instead of answering.
the earth being round, gravity, black hols are all good theories while the earth being flat is a second graders first hypothesis in his science work book.
There is actually some basis, mainly Robotham's writings. He did some "experiments" that "prove" the Earth is flat. The theory is plausible. Completely ridiculous, but plausible.
since when are 1 or a few results ever used in science? the supporters of these ideas put others down for not knowing basic science concepts when they are believing their ideas based off of a few random experiments. who is to say that he is part of a conspiracy to hide the world being round and shit went wrong and only he survived? 1 person, 1 experiment >contemporary science, physics and the laws of the universe? i think not
*Sigh* Look, I completely agree with you. But don't take it so seriously, I don't. I post here because there are in interesting people and FET is an interesting concept. There aren't too many people here who actually believe it and the ones that do are too stubborn to listen to reason anyways.
im not angry at the fact that im being argued with. im angry at the fact that grown men/women are debating in such childish and immature ways that nothing gets through their skulls.
skimming through a very old thread i found this and basically sums up this entire website.
m888: The united nationt includes countries from all over the world. It would be inpossible to show them all on a 3D globe picture.
Franct: So you acknowledge that Round Earthism cannot be represented, and thus is a sham? Interesting.
m888: What? not at all. I acknowledge that the earth is three dimensional and if you look at it from only one angle then you can't see the other side.
Franct: And now you deny what you plainly said. Interesting...
m888: I'm not denying anything! I said "picture"!!! Do you know what a PICTURE is?! It's 2 dimensional. You can't see the arctic an australia and the USA and the UK at the same time!
Franct: m888, stop evading. You said:
"The united nationt includes countries from all over the world. It would be inpossible to show them all on a 3D globe picture."
Clearly meaning that displaying all countries on a globe was impossible, and that the Round Earth model is contradictory.
im a FET and im 4 and 1/2:)