Gravitational pull.

Quote from: KingMan on February 08, 2009, 10:05:06 PM

Quote from: Raist on February 08, 2009, 07:30:03 PM

idk. I'm just a dumb amerikkkan, I don't knows me english.

I want to sig that so bad but I already like my sogs :

You should go for one that isn't insulting you.

I don't really give a shit whether they insult me or not. I go for relevance.

Quote from: Raist on February 08, 2009, 10:05:49 PM

Quote from: KingMan on February 08, 2009, 10:05:06 PM

Quote from: Raist on February 08, 2009, 07:30:03 PM

idk. I'm just a dumb amerikkkan, I don't knows me english.

I want to sig that so bad but I already like my sogs :

You should go for one that isn't insulting you.

I don't really give a shit whether they insult me or not. I go for relevance.

It is very relevant when people insult you. (because it's true.

Hell I'll sig it then, mine is so old

Quote from: Edtharan on February 06, 2009, 02:15:55 AM

Since your User name is TheEngineer, I assume you have some knowledge of engineering?

I would like to think so.

Quote

Well, in FE (or RE) will an object "fall" the same rate in a vacuum?

Yes.

Quote

If it does, then I can prove that there is an attraction between Masses (which we call gravity)

I would love for you to prove that to me.

Quote

according to the theory that Masses exert a force of attraction between them

There is your problem.

Ok, TheEngineer. Let me state again:

As you agree objects in a vacuum fall at the same rate. So, if the same object is dropped repeatedly, will it always fall at the same rate unless there is something that can influence it?

If this object is electrically neutral, non magnetic (and is shielded from these influences) and varies it fall rate in direct proportion with the Mass around it, then is it logical to conclude that it is the Mass that is effecting the fall rate of the object?

Well, this is how the Gravimeters work. They pull a Retro reflector up to the top of a tube that has had the air extracted from it (a near vacuum), then drop it and measure the rate of fall. These are so accurate that they can measure variations in the fall rate around one thousandth of one billionth in fall rate.

They have placed large masses above these machines and measured their effects. Mass really does have an influence on the fall rate of the retro reflector. Therefore there is something that Mass produces that is not of the other forces (Not Electromagnetic, not Strong Nuclear and Not Weak Nuclear forces). The only other force is Gravity, which is the attractive force between two masses. As this is exactly what is occurring, then the only conclusion is that gravity really does exist and at the strengths it is claimed to be.

If gravity exists, and it exists at the strength that it is claimed to exist with, then the Earth can not be flat, but must be Round because if it was flat, then the attractive force between the mass of the particles of the Earth would cause it to collapse into a ball. SO even if it did start out flat, it must now be round.

If gravity exists

As a force, it does not.  As a construct of one's mind, it does, but that is the only place it exists.

Quote from: Edtharan on February 12, 2009, 05:07:48 AM

If gravity exists

As a force, it does not.  As a construct of one's mind, it does, but that is the only place it exists.

so we imagine different rates of acceleration?

Quote from: TheEngineer on February 12, 2009, 12:15:53 PM

Quote from: Edtharan on February 12, 2009, 05:07:48 AM

If gravity exists

As a force, it does not.  As a construct of one's mind, it does, but that is the only place it exists.

so we imagine different rates of acceleration?

Well I hope you are capable of representing multiple derivatives of velocities. If not, then no.

Quote from: Edtharan on February 12, 2009, 05:07:48 AM

If gravity exists

As a force, it does not.  As a construct of one's mind, it does, but that is the only place it exists.

I've been away, and I return to find TheEngineer once more ruling gravitation like a tyrant. This has truly brightened my day.

Quote from: TheEngineer on February 12, 2009, 12:15:53 PM

Quote from: Edtharan on February 12, 2009, 05:07:48 AM

If gravity exists

As a force, it does not.  As a construct of one's mind, it does, but that is the only place it exists.

so we imagine different rates of acceleration?

Uh, sure.

Quote from: cbarnett97 on February 12, 2009, 01:52:38 PM

Quote from: TheEngineer on February 12, 2009, 12:15:53 PM

Quote from: Edtharan on February 12, 2009, 05:07:48 AM

If gravity exists

As a force, it does not.  As a construct of one's mind, it does, but that is the only place it exists.

so we imagine different rates of acceleration?

Uh, sure.

The I imagine a zero acceleration of the FE. So what keeps me on the ground now?

That massive pile of shit in your head that you call brains.

I could not resist.

The I imagine a zero acceleration of the FE. So what keeps me on the ground now?

Man, what are you smoking? Somebody call Narc's 'Best of RE Science' thread.

Quote from: TheEngineer on February 12, 2009, 03:53:29 PM

Quote from: cbarnett97 on February 12, 2009, 01:52:38 PM

Quote from: TheEngineer on February 12, 2009, 12:15:53 PM

Quote from: Edtharan on February 12, 2009, 05:07:48 AM

If gravity exists

As a force, it does not.  As a construct of one's mind, it does, but that is the only place it exists.

so we imagine different rates of acceleration?

Uh, sure.

The I imagine a zero acceleration of the FE. So what keeps me on the ground now?

Your lack of ability to control actual acceleration with your mind.

One thing I don't get with you FET believers is that you all say that we RET believers can't prove our theories, so you say that the round Earth isn't real, but neither can you prove your points.
So does this mean that the Earth is neither flat nor round, for all we know then it coulf be Cubed.