NASA given $400 million to study global warming

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/02/a_tale_of_two_thermometers/
Also note NASA already knows what is causing global warming.  The sun is getting hotter.  As a matter of fact, they have already noted warming in other planets too.

Yes, but they have not yet determined how this can be used in their interests!

Quote from: WastedTime on January 22, 2009, 08:51:57 AM

Yes, but they have not yet determined how this can be used in their interests!

I'm not sure I understand your post... How is it not in their interest to get 400 million dollars?

Wait a minute. Is it correct that FE claims that there exist a conspiracy?

Quote from: svenanders on January 22, 2009, 01:04:15 PM

Wait a minute. Is it correct that FE claims that there exist a conspiracy?

In general, I'd like to think that NASA et al. are just misreading the available data.  However, yes.  FE theory 99.99% of it says there is a conspiracy.  This is a consequence of the earth being flat.  They say it isn't.  They are either lying or stupid.

What would you accept as a proof? Confession by a US president? CNN "investigative report"? You have to be specific about what you are asking for. Otherwise, I would have to ask you to prove that you are not crazy, or that you really exist.

NASA is being given 400 million dollars to study global warming.  Recall that NASA is known for distorting data exagerating, and lying about global warming: http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+finds+Y2K+bug+in+NASA+Climate+Data/article8383.htm

House minority leader John Boehner raises a good point: " I don't know how giving NASA $400 million to study global warming is going to meet the goals [of an economic stimulus package.]?


Why is 400 million dollars being slipped into an economic stimulus package and more importantly into NASA's pockets to study a lie that NASA themselves created?

The global warming phenomenon is real, but the Carbon dioxide cause for it, invented by the global "climatologist" community, is a joke. Also, the targets for sales of the compact fluorescent bulbs have been reached, and the latest research is finding them to be more dangerous due to UV emissions.
So, NASA needs the money to come up with a different plausible cause for the global warning, which will, no doubt, result in more of our money being flushed down the drain by adopting some other global warming-reducing lifestyle changes. 

Alright. Then we agree that this is a claim from the FE. The burden of proof is on FE.
Now how did you come to this conclusion that there must be a conspiracy, and yes....you know this is coming...
Where is the proof of your outlandish claims?

Quote

Alright. Then we agree that this is a claim from the FE. The burden of proof is on FE.
Now how did you come to this conclusion that there must be a conspiracy, and yes....you know this is coming...
Where is the proof of your outlandish claims?

Questioning NASA's honesty isn't a claim. It's a question.

The only person claiming anything here is you.

Quote from: WastedTime on January 22, 2009, 08:16:54 AM

The global warming phenomenon is real, but the Carbon dioxide cause for it, invented by the global "climatologist" community, is a joke. Also, the targets for sales of the compact fluorescent bulbs have been reached, and the latest research is finding them to be more dangerous due to UV emissions.
So, NASA needs the money to come up with a different plausible cause for the global warning, which will, no doubt, result in more of our money being flushed down the drain by adopting some other global warming-reducing lifestyle changes. 

Where did you get that information?

Global warming is not a lie.

Quote from: C-Ray on January 22, 2009, 01:56:52 PM

Global warming is not a lie.

No, but the carbon dioxide as a cause of global warming is a lie.

Quote from: WastedTime on January 22, 2009, 04:02:44 PM

Quote from: C-Ray on January 22, 2009, 01:56:52 PM

Global warming is not a lie.

No, but the carbon dioxide as a cause of global warming is a lie.

How do you know?

Yes, but it's still a claim from your part. You claim that NASA is part of a conspiracy.
This is not the same as questioning NASA's honesty.
Therefore the burden of proof is on you.

Recall that NASA is known for distorting data exagerating, and lying about global warming: http://www.dailytech.com/Blogger+finds+Y2K+bug+in+NASA+Climate+Data/article8383.htm

Quote

Yes, but it's still a claim from your part. You claim that NASA is part of a conspiracy.
This is not the same as questioning NASA's honesty.
Therefore the burden of proof is on you.

Nope. The burden of proof is never on the skeptic in debates on religion, time travel, or the paranormal. The burden of proof isn't on the skeptic on the subject of space travel or global warming, either.

The burden is always on the claimant to prove his claims.

Yes, and FE claims that there exist a conspiracy.
Now, where is the proof? And Tom, stop dodging the question.

Yes, and FE claims that there exist a conspiracy.
Now, where is the proof? And Tom, stop dodging the question.

This reduces to the "FE belief burden of proof argument", which has been sufficiently answered in other threads.

I guess you you can't provide any evidence. Thought so.