Math Problems

  • 623 Replies
  • 59384 Views
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #540 on: September 06, 2009, 12:20:38 PM »
tbh i would have been disappointed if noone had bothered to answer.

to say somethin relevant: i thought about intergration of the area of triangles with one angle as variable but i have to find a possibility of getting the area that is counted several times in that case. i dunno if that's the way to go

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #541 on: September 06, 2009, 10:05:39 PM »
wait, I have an idea
polar coordinates. I could be wrong I am typing this with lack of sleep but I believe the shape could be described by r=1-sin(theta)*cos(theta)/sqrt(2) which you would integrate from 0 to pi/2 which I integrate by squaring then integrating normally then dividing by one half. I could be wrong someone confirm or tell me I am wrong please. so I need to integrate 1-2sin(theta)cos(theta)/sqrt(2)+sin(theta)cos(theta)*sin(theta)cos(theta)/2 which I can turn into 1-sin(2theta)/sqrt(2)+sin(2theta)^(2)/8 which I can turn into 1-sin(2theta)/sqrt(2)+(1-cos(4theta))/16 which integrates into
(theta+cos(2theta)/2sqrt(2)+(theta-sin(4theta)/4)/16)/2. right? I know a lot of trig identity. so we get (17pi/64-1/2sqrt2) or close to .4809 right?
again I could be wrong.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2009, 09:23:40 AM by optimisticcynic »
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

?

Eddy Baby

  • Official Member
  • 9986
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #542 on: September 07, 2009, 10:53:20 AM »
ah,i think i get it. one boundary is a quarter of a circle

someties i'm ashamed of myself  :(
it's clearly not a circle

That's not come up for me, but yes, the answer probably is gay porn.

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #543 on: September 07, 2009, 10:54:37 AM »
wait, I have an idea
polar coordinates. I could be wrong I am typing this with lack of sleep but I believe the shape could be described by r=1-sin(theta)*cos(theta)/sqrt(2) which you would integrate from 0 to pi/2 which I integrate by squaring then integrating normally then dividing by one half. I could be wrong someone confirm or tell me I am wrong please. so I need to integrate 1-2sin(theta)cos(theta)/sqrt(2)+sin(theta)cos(theta)*sin(theta)cos(theta)/2 which I can turn into 1-sin(2theta)/sqrt(2)+sin(2theta)^(2)/8 which I can turn into 1-sin(2theta)/sqrt(2)+(1-cos(4theta))/16 which integrates into
(theta+cos(2theta)/2sqrt(2)+(theta-sin(4theta)/4)/16)/2. right? I know a lot of trig identity. so we get (17pi/64-1/2sqrt2) or close to .4809 right?
again I could be wrong.
anyway to stay on topic does anyone know if I am right or not.


second eddy baby quit quoting him.
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #544 on: September 07, 2009, 05:17:24 PM »
2am over here so no guarantees: i found a solution for the upper boundary of the area, i doubt i'm able to intergrate it in finite time, a numerical solution yields an area of 0,2945.  
if that's correct i'll post the derivation of the upper boundary
« Last Edit: September 07, 2009, 05:19:15 PM by iznih »

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #545 on: September 07, 2009, 05:25:17 PM »
2am over here so no guarantees: i found a solution for the upper boundary of the area, i doubt i'm able to intergrate it in finite time, a numerical solution yields an area of 0,2945. 
if that's correct i'll post the derivation of the upper boundary
something somewhere went wrong. I am assuming you meant .26945. anyway I would like to see your integral, I would also like if you could take a look at mine and see if I messed up anywhere.
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

*

parsec

  • 6196
  • 206,265
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #546 on: September 07, 2009, 05:28:27 PM »
A line segment AB of length 1 has endpoints A, constrained to the nonnegative y axis, and B, constrained to the nonnegative x axis.  Let the region S of the xy plane be defined as follows.  A point P is in S if P lies within a right triangle formed by A, B, and the origin for some A,B satisfying the condition above.

What is the area of S?  What is the length of its boundary?  Find an equation of each smooth segment of the boundary of S in Cartesian coordinates.

The equation for the line segment AB with endpoints A(0, y) and B(x, 0) is:

u(t) - y = (y - 0)/(0 - x) *(t - 0) = -y*t/x

u(t) = y*(1 - t/x)

However, the parameters x and y are not independent since AB has lenght 1:

x2 + y2 = 1 => y = √(1 - x2), 0 x 1

So, we have a family of lines given by the parameter 0 ≤ x ≤ 1:

u(t; x) = √(1 - x2) * (1 - t/x)

The region S that they are talking about is delimited by the positive x and y axes and the envelope of the family of curves u(t; x). The equation of the envelope is found from the condition:

∂u/∂x = -[x/√(1 - x2)]*(1 - t/x) + √(1 - x2)*t/x2 = 0 /. x2*√(1 - x2)

- x2*(x - t) + (1 - x2)*t = 0

-x3 + x2*t + t - x2*t = 0

x3 = t

x = t1/3

Substitute this value in the equation of the line and we get:

u(t; t1/3) = √(1 - t2/3)*(1 - t/t1/3) = (1 - t2/3)3/2, 0 ≤ t ≤ 1

The area of the region S is given by the integral:

A = Int[u dt, {t, 0, 1}]

A = Int[(1 - t2/3)3/2 dt,{t, 0, 1}]

This integral can be reduced to Euler Beta function by the substitution:

z = t2/3 => t = u3/2, t = 0 -> u = 0, t = 1 -> u = 1, dt = 3/2 u1/2 du

A = 3/2 Int[u1/2 (1 - u)3/2,{u, 0, 1}]

A = 3/2 B(3/2, 5/2)

Using the relation between the Euler Beta and Euler Gamma function, we get:

A = 3/2 Γ(3/2) Γ(5/2)/ Γ(4) = (3/2) * (1/2) * (3/2) *  (1/2) * [Γ(1/2)]2 / 6 = 3*π/32

For the other parts of the problem do it yourself!
« Last Edit: September 07, 2009, 06:08:16 PM by bridget »

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #547 on: September 07, 2009, 05:56:16 PM »
somehow i arrived at 3pi/32  ???
seems i lost a factor of 2 somewhere, my solution itself seems not that bad

*

parsec

  • 6196
  • 206,265
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #548 on: September 07, 2009, 05:59:37 PM »
You are right. I missed one of the twos.

*

Euclid

  • 943
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #549 on: September 07, 2009, 06:01:14 PM »
somehow i arrived at 3pi/32  ???
seems i lost a factor of 2 somewhere, my solution itself seems not that bad

Winrar.  What was your method?
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist
Yes, thanks to the tireless efforts of Euclid and a few other mathematically-inclined members, electromagnetic acceleration is fast moving into the forefront of FE research.
8)

*

parsec

  • 6196
  • 206,265
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #550 on: September 07, 2009, 06:18:46 PM »
BTW, this is what the region S looks like:


*

W

  • 2293
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #551 on: September 07, 2009, 06:23:02 PM »
AHAHAHA UR ALL SUCH GEEEKS!! ;D

IM SOOO GLAD IM NOT A GEEEEEEEK LAIK U PPLZ.
If you say that the earth is flat, you are destroying centuries of evolution.

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #552 on: September 07, 2009, 07:14:47 PM »
BTW, this is what the region S looks like:

there has got to be a simple polar graph for this
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #553 on: September 07, 2009, 07:23:38 PM »
A line segment AB of length 1 has endpoints A, constrained to the nonnegative y axis, and B, constrained to the nonnegative x axis.  Let the region S of the xy plane be defined as follows.  A point P is in S if P lies within a right triangle formed by A, B, and the origin for some A,B satisfying the condition above.

What is the area of S?  What is the length of its boundary?  Find an equation of each smooth segment of the boundary of S in Cartesian coordinates.

The equation for the line segment AB with endpoints A(0, y) and B(x, 0) is:

u(t) - y = (y - 0)/(0 - x) *(t - 0) = -y*t/x

u(t) = y*(1 - t/x)

However, the parameters x and y are not independent since AB has lenght 1:

x2 + y2 = 1 => y = √(1 - x2), 0 x 1

So, we have a family of lines given by the parameter 0 ≤ x ≤ 1:

u(t; x) = √(1 - x2) * (1 - t/x)

The region S that they are talking about is delimited by the positive x and y axes and the envelope of the family of curves u(t; x). The equation of the envelope is found from the condition:

∂u/∂x = -[x/√(1 - x2)]*(1 - t/x) + √(1 - x2)*t/x2 = 0 /. x2*√(1 - x2)

- x2*(x - t) + (1 - x2)*t = 0

-x3 + x2*t + t - x2*t = 0

x3 = t

x = t1/3

Substitute this value in the equation of the line and we get:

u(t; t1/3) = √(1 - t2/3)*(1 - t/t1/3) = (1 - t2/3)3/2, 0 ≤ t ≤ 1

The area of the region S is given by the integral:

A = Int[u dt, {t, 0, 1}]

A = Int[(1 - t2/3)3/2 dt,{t, 0, 1}]

This integral can be reduced to Euler Beta function by the substitution:

z = t2/3 => t = u3/2, t = 0 -> u = 0, t = 1 -> u = 1, dt = 3/2 u1/2 du

A = 3/2 Int[u1/2 (1 - u)3/2,{u, 0, 1}]

A = 3/2 B(3/2, 5/2)

Using the relation between the Euler Beta and Euler Gamma function, we get:

A = 3/2 Γ(3/2) Γ(5/2)/ Γ(4) = (3/2) * (1/2) * (3/2) *  (1/2) * [Γ(1/2)]2 / 6 = 3*π/32

For the other parts of the problem do it yourself!
okay where can I learn how to do this? any good web sites? I never learned how to use parametric to solve integrals very well.
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #554 on: September 08, 2009, 05:12:29 AM »
somehow i arrived at 3pi/32  ???
seems i lost a factor of 2 somewhere, my solution itself seems not that bad

Winrar.  What was your method?

similar to bridget's method, i used x and the angle formed by the x-axis and AB though. that leads to

y=sin(phi)-xtan(phi)

for a given x  dy/dphi=0 leads to cos(phi)^3=x

i plugged that into the formula for y and was a bit lost cause i had no idea on how to integrate it. i showed it a mate and he somehow solved it  :o . seems he only wrote the remaining sine as sqrt(1-cos^2) and plugged in cos(phi)^3=x leading to bridget's integral

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #555 on: September 12, 2009, 12:16:09 AM »
since no one else is posting I will post a question I enjoyed solving in a past physics class. the problem once you understand it is quite easy to solve.
you have a refrigerator that ways 150 Kg and is 1 meter deep and 2.5 meters tall, the center of mass is in the center and the coefficient of static friction is .4. what is the maximum height you can push on the fridge and it will move forward instead of tipping.
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #556 on: September 12, 2009, 12:31:27 AM »
since no one else is posting I will post a question I enjoyed solving in a past physics class. the problem once you understand it is quite easy to solve.
you have a refrigerator that ways 150 Kg and is 1 meter deep and 2.5 meters tall, the center of mass is in the center and the coefficient of static friction is .4. what is the maximum height you can push on the fridge and it will move forward instead of tipping.

1.25 metres?

Edit: That should have been sort of obvious, now that I come to think about it. I did it a far longer way than was necessary. :(
« Last Edit: September 12, 2009, 12:35:11 AM by Robosteve »
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

W

  • 2293
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #557 on: September 12, 2009, 08:04:22 AM »
since no one else is posting I will post a question I enjoyed solving in a past physics class. the problem once you understand it is quite easy to solve.
you have a refrigerator that ways 150 Kg and is 1 meter deep and 2.5 meters tall, the center of mass is in the center and the coefficient of static friction is .4. what is the maximum height you can push on the fridge and it will move forward instead of tipping.

1.25 metres?

Edit: That should have been sort of obvious, now that I come to think about it. I did it a far longer way than was necessary. :(

How on earth??   ???

GEEEK. :(

At least I can take solace in the fact that knowing this isn't ever going to help anyone outside of school.

In the real world, math genius = pizza boy. So there.
If you say that the earth is flat, you are destroying centuries of evolution.

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #558 on: September 12, 2009, 08:53:29 AM »
since no one else is posting I will post a question I enjoyed solving in a past physics class. the problem once you understand it is quite easy to solve.
you have a refrigerator that ways 150 Kg and is 1 meter deep and 2.5 meters tall, the center of mass is in the center and the coefficient of static friction is .4. what is the maximum height you can push on the fridge and it will move forward instead of tipping.

1.25 metres?

Edit: That should have been sort of obvious, now that I come to think about it. I did it a far longer way than was necessary. :(
Eh you aren't the only one. when we were first asked this in my physics 1 class I was the only one who used under a page of work. for some reason people have trouble with this one. the over complicate it.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2009, 08:57:17 AM by optimisticcynic »
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #559 on: September 12, 2009, 08:55:17 AM »
Eh you aren't the only one. one we were first asked this in my physics 1 class I was the only one who used under a page of work. for some reason people have trouble with this one. the over complicate it.

What the hell? I did it a needlessly complicated way, and even I had under a page of work. Tell the other people in your physics class that they are fucking retarted.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2009, 08:59:52 AM by Robosteve »
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #560 on: September 12, 2009, 08:59:01 AM »
Eh you aren't the only one. one we were first asked this in my physics 1 class I was the only one who used under a page of work. for some reason people have trouble with this one. the over complicate it.

What the hell? I did it a needlessly complicated way, and even I had under a page of work. Tell the other people in your physics class that they are fucking retarted.
A. that would be hard since I took the class in high school over 1.5 years ago and
B. we didn't have a teacher. give them a little slack.
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #561 on: September 12, 2009, 08:59:59 AM »
Now that I look at it again, my way may not have been that unnecessarily complicated. What way did you do it?
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #562 on: September 12, 2009, 12:31:02 PM »
Here is a good physics one dealing with Geodesics

Show that  UBUalpha;B=fUalpha
where f is a scalar function, parametrizes the same geodesic as:  UBUalpha;B=0

Good Luck
Only 2 things are infinite the universe and human stupidity, but I am not sure about the former.

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 9074
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #563 on: September 12, 2009, 04:05:52 PM »
I think the unspoken rule here is to post problems you can solve yourself.
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #564 on: September 12, 2009, 04:49:31 PM »
I think the unspoken rule here is to post problems you can solve yourself.
Oh I can solve it. It is a problem that I had for one of my classes
Only 2 things are infinite the universe and human stupidity, but I am not sure about the former.

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #565 on: September 12, 2009, 07:23:40 PM »
Now that I look at it again, my way may not have been that unnecessarily complicated. What way did you do it?
I made an equation 9.81*150*.4*(force of static friction.)h=150*9.81*.5(torque caused by gravity.) solve for h. most stuff canceled.
You can't outrun death forever
But you can sure make the old bastard work for it.

*

Euclid

  • 943
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #566 on: September 12, 2009, 08:05:05 PM »
I think the unspoken rule here is to post problems you can solve yourself.
Oh I can solve it. It is a problem that I had for one of my classes

Given the content of your previous posts and the nature of the problem, I'm calling BS and saying you stole this from a textbook or a class website.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2009, 08:12:08 PM by Euclid »
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist
Yes, thanks to the tireless efforts of Euclid and a few other mathematically-inclined members, electromagnetic acceleration is fast moving into the forefront of FE research.
8)

Re: Math Problems
« Reply #567 on: September 12, 2009, 09:55:46 PM »
I think the unspoken rule here is to post problems you can solve yourself.
Oh I can solve it. It is a problem that I had for one of my classes

Given the content of your previous posts and the nature of the problem, I'm calling BS and saying you stole this from a textbook or a class website.
Your powers of observation are outstanding, especially since i said that it came from one of my classes
Only 2 things are infinite the universe and human stupidity, but I am not sure about the former.

*

Euclid

  • 943
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #568 on: September 12, 2009, 10:39:05 PM »
I think the unspoken rule here is to post problems you can solve yourself.
Oh I can solve it. It is a problem that I had for one of my classes

Given the content of your previous posts and the nature of the problem, I'm calling BS and saying you stole this from a textbook or a class website.
Your powers of observation are outstanding, especially since i said that it came from one of my classes

I'm guessing you stole this problem from the Caltech website, and I'm fairly certain you never went there.
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist
Yes, thanks to the tireless efforts of Euclid and a few other mathematically-inclined members, electromagnetic acceleration is fast moving into the forefront of FE research.
8)

*

Euclid

  • 943
Re: Math Problems
« Reply #569 on: September 12, 2009, 10:42:05 PM »
In fact, I just found the problem to which you refer in last academic year's course materials.  How original.
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist
Yes, thanks to the tireless efforts of Euclid and a few other mathematically-inclined members, electromagnetic acceleration is fast moving into the forefront of FE research.
8)