Dark matter

  • 24 Replies
  • 7310 Views
?

lomfs24

  • 101
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« on: June 15, 2006, 02:25:59 PM »
There have been several references to dark matter, or dark energy. It is applied, seemingly, to anything that can't be expained. What exactly is this dark matter or dark energy?
7.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot

?

Unimportant

  • 1229
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2006, 02:31:00 PM »
It's kinda like gravity; we know what it does, and we see its effects, but we don't really have any idea why it happens, or what specifically it is.

?

googleSearch

  • 257
  • +0/-0
Re: Dark matter
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2006, 02:31:33 PM »
Quote from: "lomfs24"
There have been several references to dark matter, or dark energy. It is applied, seemingly, to anything that can't be expained. What exactly is this dark matter or dark energy?


It is a fancy way of scientists to say "We don't know"

?

googleSearch

  • 257
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2006, 02:33:11 PM »
Quote from: "Unimportant"
It's kinda like gravity; we know what it does, and we see its effects, but we don't really have any idea why it happens, or what specifically it is.


It is the same way with any physics law, not just gravity.

?

lomfs24

  • 101
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2006, 02:44:36 PM »
Couldn't they find a better name for it like dynamic geothermal coupling quadraplexing? Sounds better and far more researched than dark energy. Dark energy is something I would expect to find in a box of Captain Crunch. And Dark Matter sounds like something you might find in the bottom of a reactor in a nuclear power plant.
7.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot

?

lomfs24

  • 101
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2006, 02:45:34 PM »
I think they found some dark matter when they pumped out my septic tank last winter.
7.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot

?

Unimportant

  • 1229
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2006, 02:48:01 PM »
Would you feel better if we pretended that Dark was actually an acronym for Dynamic Anti-matter Retrograde Kinesthesis or something equally inappropriate?

Dark matter will henceforth be refered to as DARK Matter, so as to satisfy the public need for complexity.

?

DrQuak

  • 256
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2006, 02:53:34 PM »
I imagine their "Dark Matter" or "Dark Energy" is just them stealing a term from astromoners

?

lomfs24

  • 101
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2006, 02:57:27 PM »
Quote from: "Unimportant"
Would you feel better if we pretended that Dark was actually an acronym for Dynamic Anti-matter Retrograde Kinesthesis or something equally inappropriate?

Dark matter will henceforth be refered to as DARK Matter, so as to satisfy the public need for complexity.
Perfect!!! Brilliant!!! Now it makes so much more sense. From this time forward it will be known as Dynamic Anti-matter Retrograde Kinesthesis matter or energy.
7.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot

?

lomfs24

  • 101
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #9 on: June 15, 2006, 03:00:45 PM »
This, I assume, would be just like comparing it to a magnet. There is a magnet (DARK matter) and then a magnetic field (DARK energy). Am I close to grasping the truth yet? Of course I understand that DARK matter and DARK energy is nothing physically like a magnet I am just drawing a corolation between a solid and the energy it produces.
7.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot

?

Pythagorus

  • 18
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #10 on: June 15, 2006, 04:21:28 PM »
I thought dark matter and dark energy weren't related.  Dark matter is just the stuff that causes all the unknown gravitational effects on galaxies, and dark energy is supposed to be the negative pressure that causes the expansion of the universe.
Since flat earthers probably don't believe in gravitational effects on galaxies or the expansion of the universe, then it's probably the term that was borrowed, not the connotations of the term.

?

Paradoxical

  • 73
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #11 on: June 15, 2006, 06:48:27 PM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter


Wikipedia for the win




Now, I'm not saying that I've read through these, or understand the few parts that I did read, but, uh, just a quick search in Wikipedia turned these up. So enjoy.
Who really needs one of these things?

*

UNCLE JIM BOB

  • 124
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #12 on: June 15, 2006, 06:51:07 PM »
What about Darth Energy.
In Question
-ujb

?

Paradoxical

  • 73
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #13 on: June 15, 2006, 06:52:01 PM »
Quote from: "UNCLE JIM BOB"
What about Darth Energy.
In Question
-ujb


Like the Force?
Who really needs one of these things?

*

Luke_smith64

  • 388
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #14 on: June 15, 2006, 06:54:15 PM »
Quote from: "Unimportant"
It's kinda like gravity; we know what it does, and we see its effects, but we don't really have any idea why it happens, or what specifically it is.


we know why gravity happens, and what it is

now for something really cool, has anyone heard of stephen hawkings theory of anti-matter?
 am the center of the universe

?

Paradoxical

  • 73
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #15 on: June 15, 2006, 06:55:44 PM »
Do you mean the whole theory including Hawking Radiation and black holes and the like?
Who really needs one of these things?

*

Luke_smith64

  • 388
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #16 on: June 15, 2006, 07:25:02 PM »
Quote from: "Paradoxical"
Do you mean the whole theory including Hawking Radiation and black holes and the like?


yes, ive been reading up alot about this lately.

turns out, a small black hole could have gone through earth in 1908 in Siberia. it was called the tungus event.
 am the center of the universe

?

lomfs24

  • 101
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #17 on: June 16, 2006, 05:29:43 AM »
Quote from: "UNCLE JIM BOB"
What about Darth Energy.
In Question
-ujb

What about slim fast?
In Question
7.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot

?

lomfs24

  • 101
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #18 on: June 16, 2006, 05:30:43 AM »
Quote from: "Luke_smith64"
Quote from: "Paradoxical"
Do you mean the whole theory including Hawking Radiation and black holes and the like?


yes, ive been reading up alot about this lately.

turns out, a small black hole could have gone through earth in 1908 in Siberia. it was called the tungus event.


Now, this sounds interesting. Where would I find information on anti-matter Hawkings and The Tungus Event?
7.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot

*

UNCLE JIM BOB

  • 124
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #19 on: June 16, 2006, 05:33:51 AM »
Quote from: "lomfs24"
Quote from: "UNCLE JIM BOB"
What about Darth Energy.
In Question
-ujb

What about slim fast?
In Question

I have no concerns for my bodily appearances, such concern goes against the man-code. Now rather than a witty retort, do you have anything to contribute with regard to "Darth Energy".
-ujb.

?

lomfs24

  • 101
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #20 on: June 16, 2006, 06:19:17 AM »
Quote from: "UNCLE JIM BOB"
Quote from: "lomfs24"
Quote from: "UNCLE JIM BOB"
What about Darth Energy.
In Question
-ujb

What about slim fast?
In Question

I have no concerns for my bodily appearances, such concern goes against the man-code. Now rather than a witty retort, do you have anything to contribute with regard to "Darth Energy".
-ujb.

You obviously have no concern for your bodily appearance. I am not sure of what man-code you are refering to. But the man code that I go by states that a man should be in good enough condition so as not to get winded by eating a bag of chips.
As to "Darth Energy" that is the stupidest thing since Erik the Viking mistakenly ordered 10,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside.
7.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot

?

googleSearch

  • 257
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #21 on: June 16, 2006, 08:11:13 AM »
Quote from: "lomfs24"
Quote from: "Luke_smith64"
Quote from: "Paradoxical"
Do you mean the whole theory including Hawking Radiation and black holes and the like?


yes, ive been reading up alot about this lately.

turns out, a small black hole could have gone through earth in 1908 in Siberia. it was called the tungus event.


Now, this sounds interesting. Where would I find information on anti-matter Hawkings and The Tungus Event?


Tunguska was no black hole. It was a comet or an asteroid that exploded 1 mile over tundra. It created an explosion wave that hit the trees and formed a butterfly-like form by the way of trees fell. The pattern was later reproduced in the lab. That's how it was determined that it exploded in the air instead of on impact.

?

Sepulchre

  • 20
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #22 on: June 17, 2006, 08:38:09 PM »
UNCLE JIM BOB wrote:
Quote

What about Darth Energy.
In Question
-ujb


Ha  I greatly appreciated the humour in that post, thank you for that ujb, and serious lomfs...insults and personal insults really dont give anyone the impression that your points will be valid or even worth listening too.

[/quote]

?

Paradoxical

  • 73
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #23 on: June 17, 2006, 08:52:20 PM »
Quote from: "googleSearch"
Quote from: "lomfs24"
Quote from: "Luke_smith64"
Quote from: "Paradoxical"
Do you mean the whole theory including Hawking Radiation and black holes and the like?


yes, ive been reading up alot about this lately.

turns out, a small black hole could have gone through earth in 1908 in Siberia. it was called the tungus event.


Now, this sounds interesting. Where would I find information on anti-matter Hawkings and The Tungus Event?


Tunguska was no black hole. It was a comet or an asteroid that exploded 1 mile over tundra. It created an explosion wave that hit the trees and formed a butterfly-like form by the way of trees fell. The pattern was later reproduced in the lab. That's how it was determined that it exploded in the air instead of on impact.



Tunguska was a meteorite that impacted the Earth. Scientists found a large blast radius, that felled many trees and whatnot.


The thing about the Tunguska event was that it showed a small object, travelling at high velocity, will not only cause an impact crater, but disintegrate on impact. This can be shown if you shoot a fairly high-powered rifle into a sandbox, or into the sand on the beach.
Who really needs one of these things?

?

lomfs24

  • 101
  • +0/-0
Dark matter
« Reply #24 on: June 18, 2006, 08:06:51 AM »
Quote from: "Sepulchre"
UNCLE JIM BOB wrote:
Quote

What about Darth Energy.
In Question
-ujb


Ha  I greatly appreciated the humour in that post, thank you for that ujb, and serious lomfs...insults and personal insults really dont give anyone the impression that your points will be valid or even worth listening too.

[/quote]In all seriousness, in nearly every thread UJB has been in has degenerated into a mass of insults usually started by UJB. This very thread he opens with an off topic stupid comment that beggs someone to take a shot at him. The the thread winds down from there to the point that nothing gets answered.

In short, the sooner you can get UJB out of a thread the better the thread will be. Some people are simply a waste of air and space.
7.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot