Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?

  • 1237 Replies
  • 316528 Views
*

NotSoSkeptical

  • 7116
  • Flatness as in the shape of a water droplet.
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #960 on: July 30, 2020, 05:36:58 AM »
A friend of Serov told me a lot.
How do you know that what he told you was true and not just more Communist propaganda and misinformation?
Well, I knew his daughter and wife and he sounded truthful. I explain all at my website.
Good propaganda and misinformation always sounds truthful, especially when it reinforces your own preconceptions.
Well, you have opinions about anything. You ask a question. I answer. You insult me. Does it make you happy? You sound being unhappy. Get some fresh air.
It would make me happy if you answer the questions that I ask rather than rambling on about random things that rattle around in your head.
Well, I repaired a ship at Mombasa, Kenya 1999 and met a woman whose father had assisted Stalin, or a Mr. Serov,  to build a fake a-bomb 1948/58. I checked the info and it appeared correct. Same woman agreed with me that the ship M/S Estonia sank due to sabotage 1994. And we watched - on TV - how the WTC at NY was destroyed by explosives 2001. I explain it at my website http://heiwaco.com .

What was the name of the ship you repaired?  You remember all the other minute details very well, the name of the ship should easily be remembered.
Rabinoz RIP

*

Heiwa

  • 9390
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #961 on: July 30, 2020, 06:14:57 AM »
A friend of Serov told me a lot.
How do you know that what he told you was true and not just more Communist propaganda and misinformation?
Well, I knew his daughter and wife and he sounded truthful. I explain all at my website.
Good propaganda and misinformation always sounds truthful, especially when it reinforces your own preconceptions.
Well, you have opinions about anything. You ask a question. I answer. You insult me. Does it make you happy? You sound being unhappy. Get some fresh air.
It would make me happy if you answer the questions that I ask rather than rambling on about random things that rattle around in your head.
Well, I repaired a ship at Mombasa, Kenya 1999 and met a woman whose father had assisted Stalin, or a Mr. Serov,  to build a fake a-bomb 1948/58. I checked the info and it appeared correct. Same woman agreed with me that the ship M/S Estonia sank due to sabotage 1994. And we watched - on TV - how the WTC at NY was destroyed by explosives 2001. I explain it at my website http://heiwaco.com .

What was the name of the ship you repaired?  You remember all the other minute details very well, the name of the ship should easily be remembered.
Of course I remember the name of the ship. Just ask the harbor master. She, the passenger ship, was old, royal something. Her major problem was the sewage system. One of my specialties. So I fixed it. The bulgarian crew didn't like the engine room to be filled with shit. Nor the Greek deck/engine officers. Mixed crew. Worked fine on the east African coast.

Anyway from 07.00 am until 05.00 pm I had fun at the repair shipyard and then I returned to play tennis at the hotel. And there, after tennis, in the bar I spotted E. What a woman!! Her father assisted Stalin/Serov to build nuclear weapons!!!!!!! Topic.

You'll know more by reading the book of my life I am writing when I am not working. It will be a good book.
« Last Edit: July 30, 2020, 06:18:42 AM by Heiwa »

*

Heiwa

  • 9390
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #962 on: July 30, 2020, 06:26:43 AM »
Can you tell us the name of the harbor master so we can ask him the name of the ship, or just answer the question without your usual sewage (of which you are a self proclaimed specialist)
No, you have to ask the agent looking after the ship in the port. I was there just to assist repairing it and approve the costs. It was >20 years ago. I just record my findings at http://heiwaco.com .

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42019
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #963 on: July 30, 2020, 06:32:37 AM »
No conspiracies
9/11 - Insurance fraud by a powerful group = pure crime. USA/GWB attacks terrorists at  Afghanistan and Iraq and loses. US experts think top of structures can drop and make bottom into dust.
Apollo - Hollywood style entertainment ordered by Potus JFK = pure nonsense.
A-Bombs - Propaganda to quickly stop the war in the Far East 1945 = good military tactic. USA forgot to call it off.
Virus - known experts think it will kill us all - 100% - pandemic style while in reality 99.98% survives = the experts are wrong.
If more than one person is involved in the planning of a crime, then that is pretty much the definition of a conspiracy.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

JJA

  • 5182
  • Math is math!
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #964 on: July 30, 2020, 08:07:03 AM »
Well, I repaired a ship at Mombasa, Kenya 1999 and met a woman whose father had assisted Stalin, or a Mr. Serov,  to build a fake a-bomb 1948/58. I checked the info and it appeared correct. Same woman agreed with me that the ship M/S Estonia sank due to sabotage 1994. And we watched - on TV - how the WTC at NY was destroyed by explosives 2001. I explain it at my website http://heiwaco.com .

So all your conspiracies are true because you met some woman who agreed with you?

It's not too hard to believe you met another conspiracy theorist. Who just happened to watch 9/11 with you after confirming all of your other conspiracy theories. That's a little harder to swallow.

Too many people saw the planes hit for it to be a hoax.  No explosive residue was ever found.  You can keep denying you are pushing conspiracy theories, but that's exactly what this is.  You can claim it was for insurance fraud AND to start a war, but that only makes it meet the definition more.

The world is filled with enough terrible people and things, no need to invent more of them.

*

Heiwa

  • 9390
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #965 on: July 30, 2020, 10:01:30 AM »
Well, I repaired a ship at Mombasa, Kenya 1999 and met a woman whose father had assisted Stalin, or a Mr. Serov,  to build a fake a-bomb 1948/58. I checked the info and it appeared correct. Same woman agreed with me that the ship M/S Estonia sank due to sabotage 1994. And we watched - on TV - how the WTC at NY was destroyed by explosives 2001. I explain it at my website http://heiwaco.com .

So all your conspiracies are true because you met some woman who agreed with you?

It's not too hard to believe you met another conspiracy theorist. Who just happened to watch 9/11 with you after confirming all of your other conspiracy theories. That's a little harder to swallow.

Too many people saw the planes hit for it to be a hoax.  No explosive residue was ever found.  You can keep denying you are pushing conspiracy theories, but that's exactly what this is.  You can claim it was for insurance fraud AND to start a war, but that only makes it meet the definition more.

The world is filled with enough terrible people and things, no need to invent more of them.

Yes, yes. But you can fly as many planes you like into tops of towers and nothing happens below. No structure of any kind collapses from top down. http://heiwaco.com/tower.htm

*

JJA

  • 5182
  • Math is math!
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #966 on: July 30, 2020, 10:20:10 AM »
No structure of any kind collapses from top down.

No matter what kind of engineering knowledge you once might have had, this single statement is proof you lost it.

Ever play Jenga?

*

Stash

  • 8618
  • I am car!
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #967 on: July 30, 2020, 12:45:39 PM »
According Wikipedia a conspiracy theory is an explanation for an event or situation that invokes a conspiracy by sinister and powerful groups, often political in motivation, when other explanations are more probable.

My website is not about conspiracy theories. It is about safety at sea and some strange incidents of ships sinking for mysterious reasons and not simple loss of buoyancy due to sabotage. The people investigating the incidents at sea were just paid to hide the real cause.

I have added some other mysteries like nuclear weapons that do not work since 1945, actors playing asstronuts in space since 1958, towers that collapse at NYC due to Arabs landing planes in the tops 2001 and this virus killing all of us right now, etc. Only idiots believe in these matters due to simple manipulations of their brains.  No conspiracy at all.

PS The solution to protect yourself against the virus is to carry a mask and to get vaccinated.

Are you high?

Everything on your site fits the definition of conspiracy theories to a tee?

9/11 - The official story is a lie perpetuated by a powerful group
Apollo - The official story is a lie perpetuated by a powerful group
A-Bombs - The official story is a lie perpetuated by a powerful group
Virus -The official story is a lie perpetuated by a powerful group

How is your interpretation even remotely different than the definition?

Well, A-bombs were invented to stop WW2 in the Far East 1945 allowing the Japanese emperor to remain on the throne. It was a US/Japan agreement and not really a sinister conspiracy. It stopped a war. But nukes became good biz afterwards.
Apollo 1969 was just to make JFK happy and to entertain the Americans. Not a sinister conspiracy. It was good Hollywood entertainment with rockets taking off, etc.
911 2001! Well the towers were full of asbestos, worthless and thus blown up. It was a typical insurance fraud! Not a sinister conspiracy. And a good excuse for USA to attack Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, etc. Happens all the time!
The VIRUS 2020? Plenty politicians/experts scare us that we will all die due to it. But where I live the hospital is empty and all is almost normal and I haven't seen any virus. But I agree, media reports that many other countries are hard hit and all people there will die there soon. Conspiracy? I wonder what the purpose can be? Sell vaccine?
Anyway, don't call me a conspiracy theorist.

Like I said before, you fit the absolute and pure definition of a conspiracy theorist.

9/11 - The official story is a lie perpetuated by a powerful group = conspiracy theory
Apollo - The official story is a lie perpetuated by a powerful group = conspiracy theory
A-Bombs - The official story is a lie perpetuated by a powerful group = conspiracy theory
Virus -The official story is a lie perpetuated by a powerful group = conspiracy theory

For instance:

"Moon landing conspiracy theories claim that some or all elements of the Apollo program and the associated Moon landings were hoaxes staged by NASA, possibly with the aid of other organizations."

"The most prominent conspiracy theory is that the collapse of the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center were the result of controlled demolitions rather than structural failure due to impact and fire."

See? Conspiracy theories. Period.

There is literally no way around not being one. Sorry, but you've chosen this path and your only path has been that the official story of any of these is perpetuated by a group that has to be very powerful, for sinister reasons or otherwise, to hide and keep hidden from the entire worlds population what you think the real truth is. Meaning, you are a 200%, through and through, a conspiracy theorist.
No conspiracies
9/11 - Insurance fraud by a powerful group = pure crime. USA/GWB attacks terrorists at  Afghanistan and Iraq and loses. US experts think top of structures can drop and make bottom into dust.
Apollo - Hollywood style entertainment ordered by Potus JFK = pure nonsense.
A-Bombs - Propaganda to quickly stop the war in the Far East 1945 = good military tactic. USA forgot to call it off.
Virus - known experts think it will kill us all - 100% - pandemic style while in reality 99.98% survives = the experts are wrong.

An interesting treatise on Conspiracy Theories and Theorists from MIT. I think this was written about you. "25 Questions and Answers about the Atomic Bomb":

1. Is there any evidence that a thermonuclear device exploded over Hiroshima in 1945?
No, absolutely none. According to leading historians and physicists, the thermonuclear bomb was not invented until years after the supposed detonation over Japanese territory.

2. Is there any evidence that a uranium-based "atom bomb" was ever dropped onto Nagasaki, Japan?
Absolutely not. While many historians and journalists made this claim in the late 40's and early 50's, everyone now agrees that no such bomb ever exploded over Nagasaki. Yet there are some who still stubbornly cling to this supposed "fact."

3. What are the materials needed to make an "atom bomb?"
Uranium-238 and plutonium-239.

4. Aren't these materials radioactive?
Highly so. Anybody who attempts to use these materials is endangering his/her life.

5. Is it likely that nuclear scientists in the 40's would be handling uranium and plutonium?
This would be highly unlikely. Very few people felt so threatened by the Japanese to be willing to risk their lives on a theoretical chance of a superbomb that could end a far-away war a little sooner.

6. Aren't there witnesses to the atomic bomb in Hiroshima?
The only "witnesses" that could possibly survived this supposed explosion would have been blinded by the intense flash of light, so their testimony is quite unreliable and contradictory.

7. According to conventional historians, was the uranium bomb tested before supposedly being dropped over Hiroshima?
No. There was no testing whatsoever of a uranium bomb in Alamogordo or anywhere else before Hiroshima.

8. Isn't that strange?
Yes. Typical weapons are tested for months and years before deployment; there is no other weapon that according to the accepted "facts" deployed before any testing whatsoever.

9. How many witnesses are there for all of the atomic tests allegedly occuring during the fifties and sixties?
Very few, perhaps a few hundred, who claimed to have seen them.

10. What did the General Advisory Committee of the Atomic Energy Commission say in their report of October 30, 1949?
They recommended strongly against the development of what they called the "Super Bomb," which is simply a thermonuclear bomb. They said that "A super bomb might become a weapon of genocide."

11. Isn't this four years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Yes. Obviously development of nuclear weapons occurred well after their supposed implementation in 1945.

12. Is radioactivity dangerous?
Everything is radioactive to some extent.

13. What was the triggering method of the bomb that supposedly was dropped on Hiroshima?
According to the standard historical accounts, it used a gun-assembly trigger.

14. Wasn't the gun-assembly method of triggering abandoned in the design stage?
Yes; according to these same sources the gun method would not work with uranium-derived plutonium-239 because some of the plutonium-239 absorbs a neutron to become plutonium-240, which undergoes spontaneous fission, all before supercriticality, causing a premature and very small explosion that is unusable for the very purpose that it was supposedly designed for!

15. How do conventional historians rectify these two "facts?"
They don't even attempt to.

16. How many books have been written about the atomic bomb?
Many hundreds, as well as thousands of articles in magazines and newspapers.

17. Why was Hiroshima "targeted," and not Tokyo?
Perhaps because no one had heard of Hiroshima, and no one knew anyone from there. It would be far more difficult to claim that Tokyo was bombed than Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In fact, most world maps from before "World War Two" do not even mention these cities at all.

18. How does Japan benefit from the "atom bomb" story?
As a direct result of the "war," Japan has received billions of dollars worth of US aid for its defense. Japan has essentially no defense budget, so it can pour resources through MITI into defeating the US economically, all while playing on the emotions of anti-"nuke" activists about the "horrors" of nuclear weapons.

19. Wow, I never thought of that. How else do the Japanese benefit from this story?
The Japanese now own major Hollywood studios, from which many war movies are produced. Also, they play upon our sympathy for the supposed "atom bomb" to blind us to the fact that this foreign nation has taken over our semiconductor industry, many California banks and practically the entire state of Hawaii.
This is all a part of the Japanese plot to take over the world. According to the "Protocols of the Elders of the Orient," this is a Japanese conspiracy all foretold by their ancient texts that very few Anglo-Saxons have the ability to read.

19. How many people are supposed to have died in the explosions?
It is hard to say. Some sources say 60,000 in Hiroshima, others say 140,000. No attempt has been made to rectify the various numbers.

20. How many people die annually from car accidents in the US?
Over 50,000.

21. So, what makes Hiroshima so special?
Nothing, especially given the contradictory evidence about it.

22. Boy, I'm mad. What should I do about this?
Glad you asked. First, send me lots of money so we can spread this message far and wide. Maybe we'll take out ads in college newspapers or something.
Second, direct your anger at the Japanese. We are the victims, and they are the aggressors. Make yourself feel important again by bashing Japan at every opportunity. Japanese people are inherently evil, and basically subhuman. They were never bombed, and if they would have been they would have deserved it. Who do they think they are, anyway?
Yes, we Revisionists have all the answers. Life is a lot simpler than you thought it was. Join us, and you won't have to be bothered anymore by any feelings of guilt for your inherent hatred. We can justify it! Oh, it's not the Japanese you hate, but the crippled? Hey - so do we! It's easy: we don't like feeling uncomfortable around people in wheelchairs, either! Who do they think they are, taking all the good parking spaces when they were stupid enough to slip on a banana peel? IT'S A CONSPIRACY! --See how easy it is to start? Now, just mix in a few real facts, and start converting all of the otherwise messed-up people to OUR CAUSE!

23. Wow! You mean that I could write stuff like this, too?
Sure! It's embarrasingly easy to write what we wrote above. In fact, it's even superior to the usual anti-Semitic revisionist garbage, because it has a higher percentage of REAL FACTS! Most of the apparent "contradictions" above come from the facts that Nagasaki was bombed by a plutonium bomb, not uranium; and that hydrogen bombs are thermonuclear, not atomic bombs. Just juggle information about the different types of bombs and mix them up so they seem to be contradicting each other. It doesn't take ANY INTELLIGENCE WHATSOEVER, and you can get lots of free air time on "48 Hours"!
Oh, I forgot to mention: I have a Japanese girlfriend who agrees with EVERY WORD I've written above. Here she is:
"Yes, I am his Japanese girlfriend. I love him very much, and I've always been troubled by my Japanese friends claiming to know people who died in Hiroshima."
There you have it! Just throw some unverifiable opinions on top of ridiculous proofs to STRENGTHEN YOUR CASE!

24. Couldn't I be arrested for this?
No! This country is founded on FREE SPEECH! But, just make sure that you mention how much you are being persecuted for saying your version of history. (More than three email messages a day qualify for being called harrassment. Five may merit a lawsuit.)

25. Where can I get more information?
Go to a library. Take a book at random. Skim it. Then, decide how that book is either for you or against you. If it is for you, quote liberally and out of context. If against you, do the same.
DON'T LET YOURSELF GET CONFUSED BY THE FACTS! We certainly don't!

https://stuff.mit.edu/people/dpolicar/writing/netsam/revisionist_history.html
We've never really been a single entity.  We're more like a collection of rabid honey badgers stuffed into a 3 piece suit.  It occasionally bears the semblance of a man

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42019
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #968 on: July 30, 2020, 12:52:02 PM »
Yes, yes. But you can fly as many planes you like into tops of towers and nothing happens below. [/quote]
The planes weren't flown into the tops of the WTC.

No structure of any kind collapses from top down.
Except when they do:
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Heiwa

  • 9390
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #969 on: July 30, 2020, 10:07:41 PM »
Yes, yes. But you can fly as many planes you like into tops of towers and nothing happens below.
The planes weren't flown into the tops of the WTC.

No structure of any kind collapses from top down.
Except when they do:

[/quote]
Topic is a-bombs and not controlled demolition of towers using explosives 911 style. Re topic I have updated http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm why no a-bombs have ever exploded anywhere.
People should be happy about it BUT plenty get upset that a-bombs are just manipulations.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 20143
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #970 on: July 30, 2020, 11:48:16 PM »
I have lost 30 pounds over the past 3 months.

I am snorting 2L/min of O2 through a cannula. It gives me a bloody nose.


Could be worse. 




         ;D



Also, Heiwa is a snot rag.




You are all such tools, have fun.


*

NotSoSkeptical

  • 7116
  • Flatness as in the shape of a water droplet.
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #971 on: July 31, 2020, 05:13:08 AM »
You are all such tools, have fun.

Who says we are not?
Rabinoz RIP

Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #972 on: July 31, 2020, 01:01:37 PM »
Yes, yes. But you can fly as many planes you like into tops of towers and nothing happens below.
The planes weren't flown into the tops of the WTC.

No structure of any kind collapses from top down.
Except when they do:

Topic is a-bombs and not controlled demolition of towers using explosives 911 style. Re topic I have updated http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm why no a-bombs have ever exploded anywhere.
People should be happy about it BUT plenty get upset that a-bombs are just manipulations.
[/quote]

You forget that you have a I witness to operation fishbowl in your audience.
a-bombs are real; there is nothing that you can say that will convince me otherwise.
The the universe has no obligation to makes sense to you.
The earth is a globe.

*

Stash

  • 8618
  • I am car!
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #973 on: July 31, 2020, 02:58:19 PM »
Yes, yes. But you can fly as many planes you like into tops of towers and nothing happens below.
The planes weren't flown into the tops of the WTC.

No structure of any kind collapses from top down.
Except when they do:

Topic is a-bombs and not controlled demolition of towers using explosives 911 style. Re topic I have updated http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm why no a-bombs have ever exploded anywhere.
People should be happy about it BUT plenty get upset that a-bombs are just manipulations.

You forget that you have a I witness to operation fishbowl in your audience.
a-bombs are real; there is nothing that you can say that will convince me otherwise.

In case you missed my earlier post. How Heiwa concocts his conspiracy theories 101:

23. Wow! You mean that I could write stuff like this, too?
Sure! It's embarrasingly easy to write what we wrote above. In fact, it's even superior to the usual anti-Semitic revisionist garbage, because it has a higher percentage of REAL FACTS! Most of the apparent "contradictions" above come from the facts that Nagasaki was bombed by a plutonium bomb, not uranium; and that hydrogen bombs are thermonuclear, not atomic bombs. Just juggle information about the different types of bombs and mix them up so they seem to be contradicting each other. It doesn't take ANY INTELLIGENCE WHATSOEVER, and you can get lots of free air time on "48 Hours"!
Oh, I forgot to mention: I have a Japanese girlfriend who agrees with EVERY WORD I've written above. Here she is:
"Yes, I am his Japanese girlfriend. I love him very much, and I've always been troubled by my Japanese friends claiming to know people who died in Hiroshima."
There you have it! Just throw some unverifiable opinions on top of ridiculous proofs to STRENGTHEN YOUR CASE!

24. Couldn't I be arrested for this?
No! This country is founded on FREE SPEECH! But, just make sure that you mention how much you are being persecuted for saying your version of history. (More than three email messages a day qualify for being called harrassment. Five may merit a lawsuit.)

25. Where can I get more information?
Go to a library. Take a book at random. Skim it. Then, decide how that book is either for you or against you. If it is for you, quote liberally and out of context. If against you, do the same.


It's almost like Heiwa read this whenever it was published and copied it verbatum. He has the girl he met in a bar just like the "I have a Japanese girlfriend..." mentioned above in #23.
He mentions all the time how he has been persecuted by the Swedish and American governments just like referenced in #24.
Cherry pick to high heaven as mentioned in #25.

He's a text book conspiracy theorist.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2020, 02:31:21 PM by Stash »
We've never really been a single entity.  We're more like a collection of rabid honey badgers stuffed into a 3 piece suit.  It occasionally bears the semblance of a man

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42019
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #974 on: July 31, 2020, 03:22:53 PM »
Topic is a-bombs and not controlled demolition of towers using explosives 911 style.
Then stop changing the subject.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #975 on: August 04, 2020, 08:09:48 PM »
then this is the right place for this statement.
Operation fishbowl is real: I was eye witness to it. Your claim is wrong. this was a test of a Nuclear Bomb scene from Hawaii.
The the universe has no obligation to makes sense to you.
The earth is a globe.

*

Heiwa

  • 9390
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #976 on: August 05, 2020, 04:01:01 AM »
then this is the right place for this statement.
Operation fishbowl is real: I was eye witness to it. Your claim is wrong. this was a test of a Nuclear Bomb scene from Hawaii.
Yes. Best way to study US nuclear bomb tests is feeding your goldfish. US media only publish Fake News about wiping out the terrorist enemies with nukes ... so why read it in a fake news paper?

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42019
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #977 on: August 05, 2020, 06:02:59 AM »
Yes. Best way to study US nuclear bomb tests is feeding your goldfish. US media only publish Fake News about wiping out the terrorist enemies with nukes ... so why read it in a fake news paper?
Why do you say such stupid things?  You do understand that trolling is against the rules, don't you?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

JJA

  • 5182
  • Math is math!
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #978 on: August 05, 2020, 07:29:43 AM »
then this is the right place for this statement.
Operation fishbowl is real: I was eye witness to it. Your claim is wrong. this was a test of a Nuclear Bomb scene from Hawaii.
Yes. Best way to study US nuclear bomb tests is feeding your goldfish. US media only publish Fake News about wiping out the terrorist enemies with nukes ... so why read it in a fake news paper?

Your reply is complete nonsense.

Feeding goldfish?  Nonsense.

No US newspaper says the us is using nukes to wipe out terrorists.  Nonsense.

He was claiming to have seen it with his own eyes, not read it in a newspaper.  Nonsense.

You didn't even respond to what you quoted.

Do you just... type whatever fantasies come into your head at the time?  Your response here like all your others contains zero content, and certainly doesn't refute an actual eye witness.

*

Heiwa

  • 9390
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #979 on: August 05, 2020, 09:54:33 AM »
then this is the right place for this statement.
Operation fishbowl is real: I was eye witness to it. Your claim is wrong. this was a test of a Nuclear Bomb scene from Hawaii.
Yes. Best way to study US nuclear bomb tests is feeding your goldfish. US media only publish Fake News about wiping out the terrorist enemies with nukes ... so why read it in a fake news paper?

Your reply is complete nonsense.

Feeding goldfish?  Nonsense.

No US newspaper says the us is using nukes to wipe out terrorists.  Nonsense.

He was claiming to have seen it with his own eyes, not read it in a newspaper.  Nonsense.

You didn't even respond to what you quoted.

Do you just... type whatever fantasies come into your head at the time?  Your response here like all your others contains zero content, and certainly doesn't refute an actual eye witness.
No, I just reply to posts about topic. Of course Nuclear Bombs do not exist. I explain why at http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm .

Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #980 on: August 05, 2020, 11:35:17 AM »
then this is the right place for this statement.
Operation fishbowl is real: I was eye witness to it. Your claim is wrong. this was a test of a Nuclear Bomb scene from Hawaii.
Yes. Best way to study US nuclear bomb tests is feeding your goldfish. US media only publish Fake News about wiping out the terrorist enemies with nukes ... so why read it in a fake news paper?
That does not answer my question: how was that flash produced?
The the universe has no obligation to makes sense to you.
The earth is a globe.

*

Heiwa

  • 9390
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #981 on: August 05, 2020, 11:57:58 AM »
then this is the right place for this statement.
Operation fishbowl is real: I was eye witness to it. Your claim is wrong. this was a test of a Nuclear Bomb scene from Hawaii.
Yes. Best way to study US nuclear bomb tests is feeding your goldfish. US media only publish Fake News about wiping out the terrorist enemies with nukes ... so why read it in a fake news paper?
That does not answer my question: how was that flash produced?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Fishbowl
It was just stupid propaganda.

*

JJA

  • 5182
  • Math is math!
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #982 on: August 05, 2020, 03:11:50 PM »
then this is the right place for this statement.
Operation fishbowl is real: I was eye witness to it. Your claim is wrong. this was a test of a Nuclear Bomb scene from Hawaii.
Yes. Best way to study US nuclear bomb tests is feeding your goldfish. US media only publish Fake News about wiping out the terrorist enemies with nukes ... so why read it in a fake news paper?

Your reply is complete nonsense.

Feeding goldfish?  Nonsense.

No US newspaper says the us is using nukes to wipe out terrorists.  Nonsense.

He was claiming to have seen it with his own eyes, not read it in a newspaper.  Nonsense.

You didn't even respond to what you quoted.

Do you just... type whatever fantasies come into your head at the time?  Your response here like all your others contains zero content, and certainly doesn't refute an actual eye witness.
No, I just reply to posts about topic. Of course Nuclear Bombs do not exist. I explain why at http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm .

Except your replies are nonsense.  The one I quoted, you made a joke (I think) about a goldfish, said newspapers are fake and made up a story about terrorists being blown up by nukes.

None of which had anything to do with responding to an eye witness of a nuclear detonation.

You don't reply to topics, you just spam links to your web page of conspiracy theories and add some random made up things.

Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #983 on: August 05, 2020, 03:42:11 PM »
then this is the right place for this statement.
Operation fishbowl is real: I was eye witness to it. Your claim is wrong. this was a test of a Nuclear Bomb scene from Hawaii.
Yes. Best way to study US nuclear bomb tests is feeding your goldfish. US media only publish Fake News about wiping out the terrorist enemies with nukes ... so why read it in a fake news paper?
That does not answer my question: how was that flash produced?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Fishbowl
It was just stupid propaganda.

sow an  I witness, cannot  move you from your delusion, you're seeing the truth only after they've been cast as shadows in your cave.
How can I help you change your mindset?
You insist that I should join you, in seeing your delusion, as the real thing, it's not going to happen.
The the universe has no obligation to makes sense to you.
The earth is a globe.

*

Heiwa

  • 9390
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #984 on: August 05, 2020, 06:56:09 PM »
then this is the right place for this statement.
Operation fishbowl is real: I was eye witness to it. Your claim is wrong. this was a test of a Nuclear Bomb scene from Hawaii.
Yes. Best way to study US nuclear bomb tests is feeding your goldfish. US media only publish Fake News about wiping out the terrorist enemies with nukes ... so why read it in a fake news paper?

Your reply is complete nonsense.

Feeding goldfish?  Nonsense.

No US newspaper says the us is using nukes to wipe out terrorists.  Nonsense.

He was claiming to have seen it with his own eyes, not read it in a newspaper.  Nonsense.

You didn't even respond to what you quoted.

Do you just... type whatever fantasies come into your head at the time?  Your response here like all your others contains zero content, and certainly doesn't refute an actual eye witness.
No, I just reply to posts about topic. Of course Nuclear Bombs do not exist. I explain why at http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm .

Except your replies are nonsense.  The one I quoted, you made a joke (I think) about a goldfish, said newspapers are fake and made up a story about terrorists being blown up by nukes.

None of which had anything to do with responding to an eye witness of a nuclear detonation.

You don't reply to topics, you just spam links to your web page of conspiracy theories and add some random made up things.
No, I think my explanations at http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm are pretty good, why nuclear weapons are 75 years old Fake News today.

There were plenty eyewitnesses that survived the FLASHes at Hiroshima and Nagasaki 1945. Of course paid for by the local rulers.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2020, 06:58:48 PM by Heiwa »

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42019
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #985 on: August 05, 2020, 07:02:09 PM »
No, I think my explanations at ... are pretty good...
You seem to be the only one who thinks that.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Heiwa

  • 9390
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #986 on: August 05, 2020, 10:00:51 PM »
No, I think my explanations at ... are pretty good...
You seem to be the only one who thinks that.
No, I have quite a following. On the other hand USA/Potus Trump & Co. say today 2020 they have plenty weapons of mass destruction to wipe out the enemy many times over for national security reasons. But it is just standard propaganda since 6 August 1945  - 75 years ago.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42019
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #987 on: August 06, 2020, 06:18:55 AM »
No, I think my explanations at ... are pretty good...
You seem to be the only one who thinks that.
No, I have quite a following.
Just because people visit your site doesn't mean that they agree with anything that you say.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Heiwa

  • 9390
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #988 on: August 06, 2020, 09:32:01 AM »
Quote from: Heiwa link=topic=26083.msg2and274991#msg2274991 date=1596678969
No, I think my explanations at ... are pretty good...
You seem to be the only one who thinks that.
No, I have quite a following.
Just because people visit your site doesn't mean that they agree with anything that you say.
Yes, you have a point. But people read what I write at my web site and there is a good response.
Do you have a web site? Or a job? How do you earn your living?

*

JJA

  • 5182
  • Math is math!
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #989 on: August 06, 2020, 10:54:00 AM »
then this is the right place for this statement.
Operation fishbowl is real: I was eye witness to it. Your claim is wrong. this was a test of a Nuclear Bomb scene from Hawaii.
Yes. Best way to study US nuclear bomb tests is feeding your goldfish. US media only publish Fake News about wiping out the terrorist enemies with nukes ... so why read it in a fake news paper?

Your reply is complete nonsense.

Feeding goldfish?  Nonsense.

No US newspaper says the us is using nukes to wipe out terrorists.  Nonsense.

He was claiming to have seen it with his own eyes, not read it in a newspaper.  Nonsense.

You didn't even respond to what you quoted.

Do you just... type whatever fantasies come into your head at the time?  Your response here like all your others contains zero content, and certainly doesn't refute an actual eye witness.
No, I just reply to posts about topic. Of course Nuclear Bombs do not exist. I explain why at http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm .

Except your replies are nonsense.  The one I quoted, you made a joke (I think) about a goldfish, said newspapers are fake and made up a story about terrorists being blown up by nukes.

None of which had anything to do with responding to an eye witness of a nuclear detonation.

You don't reply to topics, you just spam links to your web page of conspiracy theories and add some random made up things.
No, I think my explanations at http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm are pretty good, why nuclear weapons are 75 years old Fake News today.

There were plenty eyewitnesses that survived the FLASHes at Hiroshima and Nagasaki 1945. Of course paid for by the local rulers.

Your explanations are nothing more than you making outlandish claims with not a shred of evidence.

You explain nothing at all, your web site is just a list of conspiracy theories, empty of any factual content.