Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?

  • 1237 Replies
  • 289258 Views
*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #90 on: July 25, 2009, 08:46:17 AM »
Can you prove that atoms even exist?
We have magnets that can move signle atoms. What interests me is what makes up the stuff that makes up the stuff that makes up the stuff (and so on and so forth) of atoms. It should, theoretically, go on for infinity.

I just noticed this post, to answer your question, energy.

*

parsec

  • 6196
  • 206,265
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #91 on: July 25, 2009, 09:01:08 AM »
Jack that's interesting you should mention E=mc? - check this out: According to Einstein mass and energy are "different manifestations of the same thing," and "very small amounts of mass may be converted in to a very large amount of energy." Now this all sounds very scientific, but it's very important to note its title: The Theory of *Relativity* -which is dissolutionist- and next and perhaps even more revealing is the spoken equation itself, which is apparently Masonic / Kabalist: E is equal to mc-squared, in which energy is put equal to mass, multiplied by the square of the velocity of light." We've got the Square mentioned repeatedly. Light is given a velocity and is squared.
E=MC2 is the simplified version and assumes no energy other than what is in the mass itself. The proper equation is:

E2 - (pc)2 = (m0c2)2

E is energy
p is momentum
m0 is the rest mass of the object
c is the speed of light

As you can see, this is not the simple equation that you claim is Masonic/Kabalist.
What kind of 'object' are you talking about?

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #92 on: July 25, 2009, 09:03:57 AM »
Any object made of mass.

*

parsec

  • 6196
  • 206,265
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #93 on: July 25, 2009, 09:06:32 AM »
how do you know what the momentum of the 'object' is?

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #94 on: July 25, 2009, 09:12:31 AM »
how do you know what the momentum of the 'object' is?

P=mv

*

parsec

  • 6196
  • 206,265
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #95 on: July 25, 2009, 09:12:50 AM »
what is m?

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #96 on: July 25, 2009, 09:14:29 AM »

*

parsec

  • 6196
  • 206,265
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #97 on: July 25, 2009, 09:15:34 AM »
how do i measure a letter?

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #98 on: July 25, 2009, 09:17:51 AM »
how do i measure a letter?
A ruler?

*

parsec

  • 6196
  • 206,265
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #99 on: July 25, 2009, 09:21:33 AM »
but that's measuring the length of a particular occurrence of a given letter.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #100 on: July 25, 2009, 09:57:32 AM »
but that's measuring the length of a particular occurrence of a given letter.

Yes.


Now could you really make a point sometime soon? Asking random questions is kind of pointless.

*

parsec

  • 6196
  • 206,265
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #101 on: July 25, 2009, 10:00:57 AM »
E=MC2 is the simplified version and assumes no energy other than what is in the mass itself. The proper equation is:

E2 - (pc)2 = (m0c2)2

E is energy
p is momentum
m0 is the rest mass of the object
c is the speed of light

As you can see, this is not the simple equation that you claim is Masonic/Kabalist.

how do you know what the momentum of the 'object' is?

P=mv

What does your symbol 'm' stand for?

Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #102 on: July 25, 2009, 11:57:30 AM »
E=MC2 is the simplified version and assumes no energy other than what is in the mass itself. The proper equation is:

E2 - (pc)2 = (m0c2)2

E is energy
p is momentum
m0 is the rest mass of the object
c is the speed of light

As you can see, this is not the simple equation that you claim is Masonic/Kabalist.

how do you know what the momentum of the 'object' is?

P=mv

What does your symbol 'm' stand for?

Mass
Clothes are proof evolution never happened.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #103 on: July 25, 2009, 03:43:59 PM »
E=MC2 is the simplified version and assumes no energy other than what is in the mass itself. The proper equation is:

E2 - (pc)2 = (m0c2)2

E is energy
p is momentum
m0 is the rest mass of the object
c is the speed of light

As you can see, this is not the simple equation that you claim is Masonic/Kabalist.

how do you know what the momentum of the 'object' is?

P=mv

What does your symbol 'm' stand for?

Thank you, it stands for mass, P stands for momentum, v stands for velocity which is a vector quantity similar to speed but containing a direction.

Now do you have any questions that require more than a 9th grade knowledge of science?

*

Pongo

  • Planar Moderator
  • 6753
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #104 on: July 26, 2009, 02:19:10 AM »
I understand why there is confusion in this thread,  I have yet to -- and nor will I -- post how I fell about it so that the rest of you may alter your opinions accordingly.

?

17 November

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 1317
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #105 on: July 26, 2009, 03:08:38 AM »
If Violent ever returns, request that he repost the link for fake Russian nuclear bombs because it does not connect.  Ralph Epperson wrote a book about this, but I would like to see Violent's information.

As for Tom Bishop, I personally do not believe that most if any of the old bomb pictures are doctored because one can see from the photographs themselves that these bombs did not blow up an entire metropolitan area.  This is impossible as there is a physical limit to the extent of damage one bomb can accomplish.  Bethat as it may, Tom Bishop's overall conclusion is correct as usual.

At any rate, I think both Violent and Tom Bishop may be interested to see my thread on this same subject which has answered all of these questions and taken the subject further by proving that atoms do not even exist.
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=11293.0

?

Emailed

Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #106 on: August 20, 2009, 08:52:15 AM »

Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #107 on: August 24, 2009, 07:10:52 PM »
This speculation on whether or not nuclear bombs exist is an incredible insult to the victims and victim's families of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings.  It's like saying that the Columbine Shootings in Colorado were faked.  It is incredibly insensitive to anyone affected by these tragedies. 

A Flat Earth is one thing, this post took it too far.  Period.

*

parsec

  • 6196
  • 206,265
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #108 on: August 25, 2009, 07:04:02 AM »
This speculation on whether or not nuclear bombs exist is an incredible insult to the victims and victim's families of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings.  It's like saying that the Columbine Shootings in Colorado were faked.  It is incredibly insensitive to anyone affected by these tragedies. 

A Flat Earth is one thing, this post took it too far.  Period.

Freedom of speech, etc.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #109 on: August 25, 2009, 09:08:34 AM »
This speculation on whether or not nuclear bombs exist is an incredible insult to the victims and victim's families of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. 

no it isn't. They died due to war not to advance science.




*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36115
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #113 on: September 13, 2009, 11:13:18 PM »
Maybe you wanna ask this Hiroshima survivor if nuclear bombs are real then.

http://www.documentingreality.com/forum/attachments/f149/74311d1248366199-hiroshima-atomic-bomb-survivor-charonboat_dot_com_hiroshima_victim.jpg

If a nuclear weapon was really dropped on Hiroshima, there would be no survivors. Just shows how much you know about the subject you're trying to defend. ::)
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #114 on: September 13, 2009, 11:15:12 PM »
Maybe you wanna ask this Hiroshima survivor if nuclear bombs are real then.

http://www.documentingreality.com/forum/attachments/f149/74311d1248366199-hiroshima-atomic-bomb-survivor-charonboat_dot_com_hiroshima_victim.jpg

If a nuclear weapon was really dropped on Hiroshima, there would be no survivors. Just shows how much you know about the subject you're trying to defend. ::)

And how would you know the damage specifics of nuclear bombs in specific cities if they were never used in the first place?
Nice faulty logic there. Just what I'd expect from a flat earther.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
Oh, for God's sake... ::)
Look out your window.
Quote from: Bl4ke360
http://i33.tinypic.com/350t5s8.jpg

Is this supposed to prove something here?
Quote from: Tom Bishop
Looks pretty flat to me.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36115
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #115 on: September 13, 2009, 11:19:10 PM »
And how would you know the damage specifics of nuclear bombs in specific cities if they were never used in the first place?
Nice faulty logic there. Just what I'd expect from a flat earther.

Nuclear bombs kill people. Isn't that the main argument against them?
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #116 on: September 13, 2009, 11:24:14 PM »
And how would you know the damage specifics of nuclear bombs in specific cities if they were never used in the first place?
Nice faulty logic there. Just what I'd expect from a flat earther.

Nuclear bombs kill people. Isn't that the main argument against them?

People can survive all sorts of things, your argument is irrelevant. Thousands of people have survived gunshots through the brain, does this mean bullets are also a conspiracy? It doesn't mean every person in the entire city would be dead, obviously because the blast gets less intense the further away from it. Also you have other variables to account for such as buildings.

http://www.damninteresting.com/eyewitnesses-to-hiroshima-and-nagasaki?p=522?q123

Quote from: Tom Bishop
Oh, for God's sake... ::)
Look out your window.
Quote from: Bl4ke360
http://i33.tinypic.com/350t5s8.jpg

Is this supposed to prove something here?
Quote from: Tom Bishop
Looks pretty flat to me.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36115
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #117 on: September 13, 2009, 11:28:07 PM »
People can survive all sorts of things, your argument is irrelevant. Thousands of people have survived gunshots through the brain, does this mean bullets are also a conspiracy? It doesn't mean every person in the entire city would be dead, obviously because the blast gets less intense the further away from it. Also you have other variables to account for such as buildings.

http://www.damninteresting.com/eyewitnesses-to-hiroshima-and-nagasaki?p=522?q123

Guns aren't intended to kill people, which is why they are tolerated in society. By contrast, a nuclear bomb is built to kill people, and if it wasn't seen to work in tests then they wouldn't use it in practice. Therefore, if people were affected by the blast but did not die, it was not a nuclear bomb which caused the explosion.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #118 on: September 13, 2009, 11:32:44 PM »
People can survive all sorts of things, your argument is irrelevant. Thousands of people have survived gunshots through the brain, does this mean bullets are also a conspiracy? It doesn't mean every person in the entire city would be dead, obviously because the blast gets less intense the further away from it. Also you have other variables to account for such as buildings.

http://www.damninteresting.com/eyewitnesses-to-hiroshima-and-nagasaki?p=522?q123

Guns aren't intended to kill people, which is why they are tolerated in society. By contrast, a nuclear bomb is built to kill people, and if it wasn't seen to work in tests then they wouldn't use it in practice. Therefore, if people were affected by the blast but did not die, it was not a nuclear bomb which caused the explosion.

Your logic is just hilarious, I wish I had more room in my sig to add your post there. It's probably the stupidest reasoning I've heard in my life. Grenades used in war are also intended to kill people, but thousands of people survived grenade blasts. Using your logic, grenades couldn't possibly exist.

« Last Edit: September 13, 2009, 11:34:46 PM by bl4ke360 »
Quote from: Tom Bishop
Oh, for God's sake... ::)
Look out your window.
Quote from: Bl4ke360
http://i33.tinypic.com/350t5s8.jpg

Is this supposed to prove something here?
Quote from: Tom Bishop
Looks pretty flat to me.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36115
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?
« Reply #119 on: September 13, 2009, 11:37:23 PM »
Your logic is just hilarious, I wish I had more room in my sig to add your post there. It's probably the stupidest reasoning I've heard in my life. Grenades used in war are also intended to kill people, but thousands of people survived grenade blasts. Using your logic, grenades couldn't possibly exist.

Grenades don't undergo rigorous testing the way nuclear weapons are purported to. Besides, very often grenades are intended simply to maim their victims and place strain on the enemy's medical facilities.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.