Ok I don't care anymore. Think what you want about Einstein. Look at Max Plank. Great scientist and religious.
If you note, I never said that a scientist could not be religious, only that you were wrong about Einstein. You asked for proof of my claim and I provided it. Do you concede this then (as it makes no iota of difference between RET and FET it is not really important)?
But all this is off topic.
So back to the source of this dispute: It was posted by NTheGreat: "Why not then just say that every phenomena you see is done by God? A flimsy hypothesis, preventing any kind of laws being derived or any further work into how everything works, but it's wonderfully simple."
What this is, is a not too good attempt at showing the "God of the Gaps" hypothesis. In this discussion it is not God, by the Conspiracy (or more precisely "Holograms") that "did it".
You keep claiming that Hologram technology can project the images of satellites without providing a means to do so. Then when one proposition is shot down, you come up with another proposal (with no explanation of how it works other than the conspirators are using unseen technologies). This Unseen technologies, is just like the God of the Gaps.
In the God of the Gaps argument, when we have a process that at the time is unknown how it operates, God is proposed as the reason that it works. When we learn what actually makes that process work, God is moved to some other gap as the explanation.
As you, yourself actually pointed out, you can never prove something via logic. It is only possible to disprove it.
Holograms as sky projectors have been disproved - because they don't work the way you require them to.
A standard 2D projector could not do it as the image of the Satellite will appear to rotate as it passes overhead (most decent telescopes have motors in them that allow you to track satellites across the sky - I know I have done it). If a 2D projector was used, this could be done for a
single observer in a single location, but anybody else viewing that satellite would see it rotating weirdly (and serve as evidence of the conspirators). As we don't observe satellites rotating weirdly, then we can rule out a 2d projection.
As it can't be a 2D projection, and it can't be a hologram, then as there is no other proposal as to what it can be other than a real satellite, then we are left with the only proposition that Satellites are real. If Satellites are real, then the whole conspiracy thing looks shaky,
and FE
can not be true.
It is this reason that FEers are so desperate to disprove satellites as if Satellites exist, then FET can not be true.