Unpowered Space Flight

Article:
http://www.smh.com.au/news/home/technology/that-147000-lost-toolbag-has-been-spotted/2008/11/25/1227491514585.html

Video (with annoying ad)
http://media.theage.com.au/?category=Breaking%20News&rid=43991

The lost toolkit.  Please explain how this is staying up in space under the FE model.  You can catch at least the movement with the naked eye.  With a decently powerful telescope (the dude used a computerized model that's about 400-500 USD), you can determine that it's quite small, at least in comparison with other objects (i.e. as it passes the "fake" ISS).

So how's the government keeping up such a small object?  A fake ISS I can see (ignoring telescope magnifications), as it's large enough to store fuel and whatnot, but the toolkit's kind of small to store that much fuel.

It's a holographic projection into the upper atmoplane.

It's a holographic projection into the upper atmoplane.

Can you explain how that would work please?

[sits back and waits for the BS to fly with this one]

It's a holographic projection into the upper atmoplane.

Holographic projections are transmission images. That is you have to see the film that the hologram is stored on to be able to see the hologram. This means that they would need massive hologram projectors up in the sky, and these would be visible. As they haven't been seen, then it appears that they don't really exist.

I, personally, have made holograms. They are not that hard to make. They hardest thing about them is making sure that there is no movement of the object, laser or film while the exposure is being done.

Also, you can't project holograms onto a "Screen" like you can a 2D image as the holograms need to reconstruct the interference pattern on the film for you to be able to see them. Reflecting something like that off "clouds" or the like will scramble these interference patterns and spoil the hologram image for the viewer.

So, no. It can not be a holographic projection because holograms doe not work like that (well they do in sci-fi, but that is sci-fi and not reality).

Ahh, you spoiled the fun by telling him why it is impossible before we could see what his BS answer was. 

It's a holographic projection into the upper atmoplane.

Proof?

Interesting fact: Holography was invnted in my home town (Rugby, UK).

Quote from: Robosteve on November 25, 2008, 12:55:24 AM

It's a holographic projection into the upper atmoplane.

Proof?

Interesting fact: Holography was invnted in my home town (Rugby, UK).

It's a conspiracy with a government coverup.

Quote from: Robosteve on November 25, 2008, 12:55:24 AM

It's a holographic projection into the upper atmoplane.

Proof?

Interesting fact: Holography was invnted in my home town (Rugby, UK).

Yeah right Fes shows no proof of anything. They just make up whatever it takes to make their ridiculous idea work.

the government simply launches toolbag decoys from the ISS until no one care anymore. Duh

/thread

the government simply launches toolbag decoys from the ISS until no one care anymore. Duh

/thread

That made me laugh.

would bendy-light have an inverse effect on a hologram projected into the sky?

Quote from: Robosteve on November 25, 2008, 12:55:24 AM

It's a holographic projection into the upper atmoplane.

Holographic projections are transmission images. That is you have to see the film that the hologram is stored on to be able to see the hologram. This means that they would need massive hologram projectors up in the sky, and these would be visible. As they haven't been seen, then it appears that they don't really exist.

There are many hologram projectors, and they all hide each other behind holograms.

Apparently the bag can be seen....

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,457344,00.html

Looks like that is another $100,000 NASA will get to pocket from the tax payers to replace another pseudo toolkit.

This conspiracy business really is profitable. Thinking about starting my own.


How about "Waters not really wet"

Looks like that is another $100,000 NASA will get to pocket from the tax payers to replace another pseudo toolkit.

This conspiracy business really is profitable. Thinking about starting my own.


How about "Waters not really wet"

If NASA is powerful enough to keep this conspiracy going and control the governments, why do they need excuses to receive money? Why even fool us, if they are clearly powerful enough to enslave us all?

I think you guys just found a big hole in FE. Congrats.

I think you guys just found a big hole in FE. Congrats.

There is nothing but holes in FE. After doing much reading on this site I am more convinced than ever that the world is round. I also believe that that the people on this site know the Earth is round, and they just like to spark debate. Either that or they just are not that bright.

Quote from: PeopleOnBehalfOfLogic on November 26, 2008, 02:26:30 PM

I think you guys just found a big hole in FE. Congrats.

There is nothing but holes in FE. After doing much reading on this site I am more convinced than ever that the world is round. I also believe that that the people on this site know the Earth is round, and they just like to spark debate. Either that or they just are not that bright.

mostly the first one.
but theres plenty of dim people here on both sides of the fence.

once a hole in FE is exposed, the thread is locked or ignored.
just look at the few threads below this one that i dug up... all were ignored for quite some time

Soon you'll learn that this pretty accurately represents the FET, with people like Tom Bishop swimming like great big John Lennons through the middle of it, while newbies stand around pointing at the holes. "We know! Come and play in them, it's very fun!"