Plenty of Hollywood sci-fi movies have zero gravity scenes.
Speculation without evidence.
We have provided evidence that they are in space. You can't just say it's all CGI. You've got to back it up with evidence.
Can you please point out which part of this video has been faked or created using CGI?
This is the big problem with most of the FEers arguments again RE. The technique is called: Moving the Goalposts (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalpost ) and is a logical fallacy. This means that their arguments make no logical sense.
Also, according to logic and the rules of evidence, you can never disprove a positive. So this makes it impossible for REers to disprove the FE, simply because the FEers are using illogical arguments to support their positions and can therefore
make stuff up as it suits them. We are trying to argue against imagination, not reality.
If the FEers are actually interested in a rational discussion in an attempt to prove which "theory" is correct (RE or FE), then they should stick to the rules of logic and rational debate.
Although disproving a Positive is impossible, disproving a Negative is possible. You can do this by showing the Positive.
So for FEers to disprove the Negative about FE (that the Earth is not flat), then all they need is one piece of reliable data that states that the Earth is indeed Flat. Now, by reliable, it means that the evidence is repeatable (that is it not a one off event) and demonstrates something that RE can not also explain.
RE proponents have already given this (many times) on this forum and if you look at sources outside this forum then there are literally millions of pieces of evidence that support a RE that can not be replicated on a FE. And, much of this evidence is easy to come by and can not be tampered with by conspirators.
For one: On a FE there should be a difference between the Speed of the Sun (and hence time of day light) between Summer and Winter in such a way that Summer days in the Southern hemiplane is shorter than its winter, because the Sun has to orbit once every 24 hours, and on a FE, when the Sun is in the South Hemiplane it has a greater distance it has to travel (the circumference of a circle with a larger radius is larger than a circle with a smaller radius).
A RE explains this by the sun being a long way away and the Earth being Round and so does not create a shorter Summer day in the Southern Summer. So here is an observation that RE explains but FE can't. "Spot Light Suns", "Bendy Light" or even "Tiled Earth" can't explain it (neither can fish boosts
).
If the FEers can explain this somehow, then we will have to examine other evidence (which there is a lot of) that supports RE and can not be currently explained by FE.