Barack Obama Is Not Qualified to Be President

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

As a naturalized American citizen, Obama is not qualified to be president of the United States of America.

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

As a naturalized American citizen, Obama is not qualified to be president of the United States of America.

One of his parents are american, making him a full fledged citizen.

Natural born citizen.

Natural born citizen.

He is a natural born citizen. The constitution does not require that you can not change your citizenship. He meets all it's requirements. The man is simply misusing terms.

Quote from: Althalus on November 02, 2008, 12:47:03 AM

Natural born citizen.

He is a natural born citizen. The constitution does not require that you can not change your citizenship. He meets all it's requirements. The man is simply misusing terms.

Wrong in all cases.

Quote from: Raist on November 02, 2008, 12:48:09 AM

Quote from: Althalus on November 02, 2008, 12:47:03 AM

Natural born citizen.

He is a natural born citizen. The constitution does not require that you can not change your citizenship. He meets all it's requirements. The man is simply misusing terms.

Wrong in all cases.

The supreme court disagrees. They dismissed the challenge to Obama.

There have been more then one, Phillip Berg's has not been heard.

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

As a naturalized American citizen, Obama is not qualified to be president of the United States of America.

Gullible troll is gullible.

Quote from: Althalus on November 02, 2008, 12:16:48 AM

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

As a naturalized American citizen, Obama is not qualified to be president of the United States of America.

Gullible troll is gullible.

Worthless post is worthless.

Imitation is the greatest form of flattery.

Imitation is the greatest form of flattery.

In some cases. You just repeated a tired meme and I responded in turn.

And yours was an emotional backlash because you took offense at the post.
Being 'gullible' is substantial as a claim. 'Worthless' is not substantial in a factual regard as it is more derived from opinion.

And yours was an emotional backlash because you took offense at the post.

Actually, yours was an emotional backlash because you took offense at my posts.

Being 'gullible' is substantial as a claim. 'Worthless' is not substantial in a factual regard as it is more derived from opinion.

Actually, being 'worthless' is substantial as a claim. 'Gullible' is not substantial in a factual regard as it is more derived from opinion.

I beg to differ. We can all agree based on your OP that gullible troll is indeed gullible.

I beg to differ. We can all agree based on your OP that gullible troll is indeed gullible.

Agreement, in other words opinion.

Gullible troll is gullible by definition. "Worthless" is a much more subjective description as its meaning leaves greater room for ambiguity.

However, I'm sure we can all take comfort in the false security of consensus that Obama is not qualified to be president.

Worthless post is worthless by definition. "Gullible" is a much more subjective description as its meaning leaves greater room for ambiguity.

However, I'm sure we can all take comfort in the false security of consensus that Obama is qualified to be president.

I'd say he's more qualified than McCain, who spent years living in a Communist country.

Obama spent years being a non-American.

Worthless post is worthless by definition. "Gullible" is a much more subjective description as its meaning leaves greater room for ambiguity.

However, I'm sure we can all take comfort in the false security of consensus that Obama is qualified to be president.

Granted that a worthless post is worthless. However, "gullible" has a much more straightforward definition than "worthless". Something "being without worth" has far greater potential for explanation than merely someone who is naive.

And I was agreeing with you about Obama. If your method of trolling is merely to mirror a victim's post, I suggest finding a modus operandi that is easier to sustain.

I'd say he's more qualified than McCain, who spent years living in a Communist country.

His years in Vietnam are not what make him unqualified.

I know, but I was using Althalus' thinking.

And I was agreeing with you about Obama. If your method of trolling is merely to mirror a victim's post, I suggest finding a modus operandi that is easier to sustain.

1. Not trolling.
2. It's noit difficult when the argument used is so easy proven fallacious.

I know, but I was using Althalus' thinking.

He remained an American citizen, Obama did not.

It's noit difficult when the argument used is so easy proven fallacious.

Which argument is that?

ingulaЯiτy's imitation and substatial vs. opinion based arguments.

Ah. I see.

I'd say he's more qualified than McCain, who spent years living in a Communist country.

That is just stupid. McCain has over 20 years of experience in leadership, and then you want to call HIM a Communist? A famous Quote by Obama " We need to spread the wealth". Damn you are retarded. I sincerely hope that you can't vote.

I can't vote in your elections, and it wouldn't matter if I did, if the Florida ballots from the last few times are anything to go by.

Based on the fact that McCain is a racist and said he only started to love America at age 31, I don't think we should question Obama's patriotism.

Bullshit and bullshit.

Good to know you're being objective.