http://www.proofthatgodexists.org/
If website is legitimate, then you or whoever created it does not possess the proper intelligence to create logic traps. I see what the intention was, but the questions have been misunderstood by the creator.
Being an agnostic I chose, "I don't know if absolute truth exists." This alone is a fallacy as you cannot equate "truth" to the existence of a deity. Though this particular church's doctrine may have interpreted the Bible's various passages regarding the gospel to relate the two, it is wrong. If you ask me if truth exists, I will reply yes, this is because from a logical standpoint the concept of true and false statements exists. Sure, this church may equate the two, but if this little test is to be posed to non-religious types, it needs to be worded appropriately or the point is lost.
Anyways, I picked the "I don't know" option for shits and giggles, already understanding the loop I was baited into for trying to take the "agnostic" of the four options. Lo and behold, I was asked whether or not I just lied, and thus had to respond with a "truth" answer, and there we have it.
Again, this is a horrible misuse of wording applied to true/false functions, designed to trap the logical mind, but instead ends up frustrating them with stupidity.