Catholic VS Christian

Quote from: Raist on October 20, 2008, 10:59:33 AM

Do you know who's fault it is we don't all live in equality? The jews.

This is so true.  We are so genetically superior to all others, equality is impossible.  You all fight one another in an attempt to be as cool as us.

Yup, seems your only weakness is ovens. Also, showers.

It's their fault we don't live in a utopia where people from all nations, be they freemen or slaves, black or white, no matter which way their bread's buttered, can live in harmony. Wankers.

your sarcasm is hard to detect

Quote from: Jesus Crotch on October 20, 2008, 11:25:23 AM

Quote from: Raist on October 20, 2008, 10:59:33 AM

Do you know who's fault it is we don't all live in equality? The jews.

This is so true.  We are so genetically superior to all others, equality is impossible.  You all fight one another in an attempt to be as cool as us.

Yup, seems your only weakness is ovens. Also, showers.

Yeah, how many nukes does Germany have?  Oh, that's right, none.  The squatters (you might call them Palestinians)?  0.  Syria, Iran, Lebanon... Hmmm, they don't have any either!

You're shit scared of nukes, too, it appears. Also, you think the Palestinians ain't packin' nuclear heat? How cute.

You're shit scared of nukes, too, it appears. Also, you think the Palestinians ain't packin' nuclear heat? How cute.

evidence supporting the notion that they are? where is it?

Quote from: Raist on October 20, 2008, 11:26:26 AM

Quote from: Jesus Crotch on October 20, 2008, 11:25:23 AM

Quote from: Raist on October 20, 2008, 10:59:33 AM

Do you know who's fault it is we don't all live in equality? The jews.

This is so true.  We are so genetically superior to all others, equality is impossible.  You all fight one another in an attempt to be as cool as us.

Yup, seems your only weakness is ovens. Also, showers.

Yeah, how many nukes does Germany have?  Oh, that's right, none.  The squatters (you might call them Palestinians)?  0.  Syria, Iran, Lebanon... Hmmm, they don't have any either!

Germans? What do they have to do with anything? I live in the country with the largest nuclear stock pile on earth.

I think that Bush will sit on the button and fire them all at the moon before his presidency ends. With luck, a massive fragment will land on him.

Firing every nuke at the moon would be fucking sweet. I'd re-elect him to watch it happen.

I think that's what London plans to do, rather than spend, what, 8 billion on fireworks? Spend 1 billion on a nuke that will annihilate the Moon, and spent the rest on a massive piss-up.

Anyone who believes that Catholicism and Christianity are different is ignorant about church history - period.  PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE read the church history between Christ's death and Martin Luther - you know, the history that your church tells you to ignore - once you do, you will have a more complete understanding of how Christ's Church has unfolded across the centuries.  As soon as I did I became Catholic immediately.

Contrary to Protestant belief there was 1500 hundred years of Christ's church between the death of Christ and the excommunication of Luther.

-SJ

Anyone who believes that Catholicism and Christianity are different is ignorant about church history - period.  PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE read the church history between Christ's death and Martin Luther - you know, the history that your church tells you to ignore - once you do, you will have a more complete understanding of how Christ's Church has unfolded across the centuries.  As soon as I did I became Catholic immediately.

Contrary to Protestant belief there was 1500 hundred years of Christ's church between the death of Christ and the excommunication of Luther.

-SJ

They are different. Christianity is a religion, Catholicism is part of Christianity. Even though a square is a rectangle it doesn't mean they are the same thing.

Catholicism was the sole Christian Church until 1054 (Eastern Orthodox schism) and then again in 1514 (Protestant rebellion) - read your history.  Protestantism has failed and worse resulted in all the cults of the 19th century - Mormonism, JW, Christian Science, fundamentalism, etc - REPENT! Reconcile with the Mother Church- the road  home is Rome!

Claiming that true Christianity is free of religion (as if that is something bad) is a Protestant lie - all beliefs systems are made up of religion - just like all language is made up of symbols.

Great Cthulhu shall smite you all.

Catholicism was the sole Christian Church until 1054 (Eastern Orthodox schism) and then again in 1514 (Protestant rebellion) - read your history.  Protestantism has failed and worse resulted in all the cults of the 19th century - Mormonism, JW, Christian Science, fundamentalism, etc - REPENT! Reconcile with the Mother Church- the road  home is Rome!

The catholic church was the radical one in the first division you listed. The Eastern Orthodox church is much closer to what the church was pre schizm. And still catholicism is part of christianity, it is not christianity. Good to know you have basic understanding of a timeline that has nothing to do with classifications. (My roommate's dad is an orthodox Priest, you aren't telling me anything I haven't heard before)

Quote from: smackjack on March 01, 2009, 07:18:09 PM

Catholicism was the sole Christian Church until 1054 (Eastern Orthodox schism) and then again in 1514 (Protestant rebellion) - read your history.  Protestantism has failed and worse resulted in all the cults of the 19th century - Mormonism, JW, Christian Science, fundamentalism, etc - REPENT! Reconcile with the Mother Church- the road  home is Rome!

The catholic church was the moderate one in the first division you listed. The Eastern Orthodox church is much closer to what the church was pre schizm. And still catholicism is part of christianity, it is not christianity. Good to know you have basic understanding of a timeline that has nothing to do with classifications. (My roommate's dad is an orthodox Priest, you aren't telling me anything I haven't heard before)

How so?  The Roman Catholic Church was the far more moderate party in the Iconoclast controversy between the Roman and the Eastern Church and Protestants agree with the Roman Church as far as the Filioque controversy - what else is there?

Protestants are closer to Roman Catholics than Orthodox

Catholicism was the sole Christian Church until 1054 and then again in 1514.

This statement makes no sense, unless you are claiming that all other strains of Christianity became extinct in 1514.

Quote from: smackjack on March 01, 2009, 07:18:09 PM

Catholicism was the sole Christian Church until 1054 and then again in 1514.

This statement makes no sense, unless you are claiming that all other strains of Christianity became extinct in 1514.

Name a legitimate Christian Church before 1054 - there weren't any - the Roman Catholic Church was it.

Firing every nuke at the moon would be fucking sweet. I'd re-elect him to watch it happen.

I would agree with you, I really would...

... except for the fact that the missles probably don't have enough fuel to get to the moon. Then you've got the awkward situation where they fall back down on random countries, including the US. It would be awesomely cool for the 0.00365 seconds before your eyes disintegrate, though.

Also, posting in a Kingman Epic Fail Thread (TM).

Quote from: Raist on October 20, 2008, 12:18:17 PM

Firing every nuke at the moon would be fucking sweet. I'd re-elect him to watch it happen.

I would agree with you, I really would...

... except for the fact that the missles probably don't have enough fuel to get to the moon. Then you've got the awkward situation where they fall back down on random countries, including the US. It would be awesomely cool for the 0.00365 seconds before your eyes disintegrate, though.

Also, posting in a Kingman Epic Fail Thread (TM).

They'd be towed within range. Duh.

Plus, it's the only way to kill a mockingbird.

Quote from: Mykael on March 01, 2009, 11:06:53 PM

Quote from: Raist on October 20, 2008, 12:18:17 PM

Firing every nuke at the moon would be fucking sweet. I'd re-elect him to watch it happen.

I would agree with you, I really would...

... except for the fact that the missles probably don't have enough fuel to get to the moon. Then you've got the awkward situation where they fall back down on random countries, including the US. It would be awesomely cool for the 0.00365 seconds before your eyes disintegrate, though.

Also, posting in a Kingman Epic Fail Thread (TM).

They'd be towed within range. Duh.

Towed by what?

Quote from: Raist on March 01, 2009, 11:32:06 PM

Quote from: Mykael on March 01, 2009, 11:06:53 PM

Quote from: Raist on October 20, 2008, 12:18:17 PM

Firing every nuke at the moon would be fucking sweet. I'd re-elect him to watch it happen.

I would agree with you, I really would...

... except for the fact that the missles probably don't have enough fuel to get to the moon. Then you've got the awkward situation where they fall back down on random countries, including the US. It would be awesomely cool for the 0.00365 seconds before your eyes disintegrate, though.

Also, posting in a Kingman Epic Fail Thread (TM).

They'd be towed within range. Duh.

Towed by what?

Large objects specializing in propulsion.

Quote from: Mykael on March 01, 2009, 11:51:27 PM

Quote from: Raist on March 01, 2009, 11:32:06 PM

Quote from: Mykael on March 01, 2009, 11:06:53 PM

Quote from: Raist on October 20, 2008, 12:18:17 PM

Firing every nuke at the moon would be fucking sweet. I'd re-elect him to watch it happen.

I would agree with you, I really would...

... except for the fact that the missles probably don't have enough fuel to get to the moon. Then you've got the awkward situation where they fall back down on random countries, including the US. It would be awesomely cool for the 0.00365 seconds before your eyes disintegrate, though.

Also, posting in a Kingman Epic Fail Thread (TM).

They'd be towed within range. Duh.

Towed by what?

Large objects specializing in propulsion.

How many nukes are we talking about? Does the US have enough space rockets to do that?

Quote from: Raist on March 01, 2009, 11:58:58 PM

Quote from: Mykael on March 01, 2009, 11:51:27 PM

Quote from: Raist on March 01, 2009, 11:32:06 PM

Quote from: Mykael on March 01, 2009, 11:06:53 PM

Quote from: Raist on October 20, 2008, 12:18:17 PM

Firing every nuke at the moon would be fucking sweet. I'd re-elect him to watch it happen.

I would agree with you, I really would...

... except for the fact that the missles probably don't have enough fuel to get to the moon. Then you've got the awkward situation where they fall back down on random countries, including the US. It would be awesomely cool for the 0.00365 seconds before your eyes disintegrate, though.

Also, posting in a Kingman Epic Fail Thread (TM).

They'd be towed within range. Duh.

Towed by what?

Large objects specializing in propulsion.

How many nukes are we talking about? Does the US have enough space rockets to do that?

Is it your job to ruin cool things? If so I believe you helped invent several of my childhood toys that should have been way more awesome.

Alright, alright, it would be cool. Nuclear fireworks and all that.

Alright, alright, it would be cool. Nuclear fireworks and all that.

Nuclear huh?

What the fuck?

This board is only concerned with Catholicism and Christianity - which is one and the same!

Blessings!!

Nuclear huh?

What the fuck?

This board is only concerned with Catholicism and Christianity - which is one and the same!

Blessings!!

Reading comes before posting.

1. This thread is concerned with Catholicism and Christianity. This board (forum) is about Religion and Philosophy.

2. Catholicism and Christianity are different.

3. Nuking the moon is perfectly relevant to this discussion. The thread was originally about Kingman misunderstanding Christianity and Catholicism, insulting Catholicism, and getting slapped down by 20 or so people. The topic of this thread was stupid, therefore more stupidity is perfectly relevant.

AH - so the topic is stupid.

Pardon me - I thought we were concerned with the legitimacy of the Roman Catholic Church as Christian.  If not carry one with you stupidly.

I hate it when someone is Catholic and claim to be Christian. You are not! you are catholic!
Christians get a bad name because of catholics. Even in present day, the catholics are known for their corruption.
Parents can't even leave their kids alone with a priest! So please don't think that Christians and Catholics are the same
because they are not

I bolded the stupid part for you.

Christian: of, pertaining to, or derived from Jesus Christ or His teachings: a Christian faith.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Christian

So Catholicism is not derived from the teachings of Jesus? Benocrates nailed on the very first reply:

All Catholics are Christian, not all Christians are Catholics.