Sorry, Dionysios, but I was reading your post, and this struck me as somewhat out of place:
I also want to remark that his jewish motherwas involved in the occult to the point that she had a tattoo of a serpent on her right hand.
How, exactly, is this relevant?
Also, I would discourage you from equating respect for one's adversary as condoning what he was doing. When Winston Churchill wrote that "...if Britain had lost the war he wished it "would have found such an indomitable hero to restore among its place among the the nations."", he was refering to the fact that:
"In fifteen years that have followed this resolve, he has succeeded in restoring Germany to the most powerful position in Europe, and not only has he restored the position of his country, but he has even, to a very great extent, reversed the results of the Great War.... the vanquished are in the process of becoming the victors and the victors the vanquished.... whatever else might be thought about these exploits they are certainly among the most remarkable in the whole history of the world." – Winston Churchill 1935. "He also said "...One may dislike Hitler's system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated I should hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations."
I would like to see the documentation provided by David Irving, other than that out of context quote, designed to make it seem as though Chruchill admired everything about Hitler, that show Churchill's rapid change in viewpoints.
Clearly, Dionysios, he was not admiring Hitler's morals, but rather the ability he showed as a political leader, and there can be no debate that Hitler was a skilled diplomat. You'll also find that Churchill was an outspoken critic of appeasement and in favor of going to arms against Germany long before the outbreak of the war in 1939.
Also,
The British people during the war liked Hitler more than the modern historians give them credit for. To his credit, a recent book shows that the king of england favored Hitler as well. This is a reflection of the old truth that the king is the defender of the people, which traditional Russia adhered to as she and Britain with its weak king and strong nobles (capitalists) have taken two different paths since AD 1066, such a fateful year for Britain. The defender of the people has certainly not been the British prime minister.
The reason people liked Hitler so much was that they viewed fascism as a more pleasant alternative to communism, which worried much of the population. Surely it doesn't escape you that a
king is much more likely to be in favor of a system of government in which it is quite possible he will retain power rather than a system which tells people they are all equal and attempts to evenly distribute wealth? The king was in no way defending the people, but rather his own interests.
As for Russia adhering to this "age-old truth", well that worked out great for them, didn't it? That's why we're all in line for our potatoes and Britain is a third-rate world power controlled mostly by crime syndicates...oh no...wait...