Just after FE's take on this

  • 33 Replies
  • 7818 Views
*

Marcus Aurelius

  • 4540
  • +0/-0
  • My Alts: Tom Bishop, Gayer, theonlydann
Re: Just after FE's take on this
« Reply #30 on: September 23, 2008, 01:37:13 PM »
A good conspiracy is one that is not provable.  I haven't seen any proof, or evidence that a conspiracy exists on this site.  The only proof, or evidence I have seen is the whole earth is flat, therefore NASA is lying argument.

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Just after FE's take on this
« Reply #31 on: September 29, 2008, 05:44:52 AM »
Why not? Did you look up and read the books I have listed in my signature link?
Yes, (all the ones available over the internet), and they are all flawed experiments, or straight up lies.

That is ignoring the stuff making fun of FE'ers.
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Just after FE's take on this
« Reply #32 on: September 29, 2008, 05:48:09 AM »
A good conspiracy is one that is not provable.  I haven't seen any proof, or evidence that a conspiracy exists on this site.  The only proof, or evidence I have seen is the whole earth is flat, therefore NASA is lying argument.
How do you know? If it is not just speculation, post your answer in this thread:
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=22997.0
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: Just after FE's take on this
« Reply #33 on: September 29, 2008, 07:40:34 AM »
A good conspiracy is one that is not provable.

In fact, the definition of a conspiracy, in todays language, is something which cannot be proven.

That's the appeal.
Sure now... which is why people can be charged with conspiracy in court. For instance, conspiracy to transport illegal explosives. It's provable. It just hasn't been proven yet. There's a difference between a transparent/uncovered conspiracy and a well conceived conspiracy. Ragnarr got it right.
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.