Right. So we'll just take your word on that... 
No, I have given methods by which you can verify the data yourself, so I am not relying on my word alone. But I can't help it if you choose not to do so.
I am saying that the data I gathered matches what is put out by the Governments and NASA. I gave methods by which you can check that data (admittedly in other threads - but you should be able to search for it).
The methods are not that hard to find. They are use in Cartography.
Simply by first measuring out a base line of known length, then applying geometry (trigonometry) to this and taking measurements of distant landmarks and applying geometry to these distances, you can map out a network of points, the distances to them and the angles between them.
It takes a bit of Time, patience and attention to detail, but it is not all that difficult to do if you are really willing to try it. The governments have already even placed objects (called Trig Stations - or Triangulation Stations in the US), so that you can independently verify their data.
As all these object are, are just poles in the ground where you can easily see them on top of landmarks, then you can be assured that there is no aspect of the conspiracy that could be influencing your measurements (as you could have just used a tree or a rock instead of that pole, they just make it easy for you).
Which is another thing, if they Governments and NASA were trying to cover up and fake the data, why would they go to all the trouble to place objects that can be used to prove they are lying?