Forces on you and me (w illustration)

  • 21 Replies
  • 2276 Views
Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« on: September 01, 2008, 11:08:54 AM »
I just wanted to work out what forces that work on us here on earths surface..



Missed anything?
Ooompa ooompa

*

General Douchebag

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 10957
  • King of charred bones and cooked meat
Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2008, 11:12:34 AM »
The UA's below us. Your thing wouldn't work at all.
No but I'm guess your what? 90? Cause you just so darn mature </sarcasm>

Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2008, 11:15:23 AM »
The UA's below us. Your thing wouldn't work at all.

Its the direction of the red arrows that matters.. Ive just showed the direction of resulting force on the person.
Ooompa ooompa

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11842
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2008, 11:17:48 AM »
There is no rotation in FET.

Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2008, 11:23:48 AM »
Every single arrow on that thing is the wrong way round.

UA pushes up from below.
Gravity (if FE'ers admit that it exists) pulls inwards (and isn't caused by rotation).
Cenripetal force is inwards (in order to maintain circular motion).

Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #5 on: September 01, 2008, 11:26:24 AM »
There is no rotation in FET.

What? I was told otherwise..
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=22567.msg464914#msg464914
You FE:ers really need a unified agenda. Or you dont, so you can confuse everone even more.

Which one is it?  ???
Ooompa ooompa

Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #6 on: September 01, 2008, 11:30:37 AM »
Every single arrow on that thing is the wrong way round.
I believe not.

UA pushes up from below.
*sigh* I know that. It accelerates earth upwards, the resulting felt force on the guy in the illustration is down.

Gravity (if FE'ers admit that it exists) pulls inwards (and isn't caused by rotation).
The arrows points inwards.
And some think its caused by rotation.

Cenripetal force is inwards (in order to maintain circular motion).
Once again, ive illustrated the force acting on "you and me", the guy in the illustration.
« Last Edit: September 01, 2008, 11:32:08 AM by Josef »
Ooompa ooompa

Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #7 on: September 01, 2008, 11:37:45 AM »
I dont know whats hard to understand with my illustration. Its really simple, its simple because ive made it. ;)

Put a ball on a plate, accelerate the plate towards the ball, ball stick to plate. If youre the ball you feel pushed towards the plate.
Rotate the plate, ball rolls of the plate. If youre the ball, you feel dragged out the edge.
Ooompa ooompa

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11842
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #8 on: September 01, 2008, 11:48:36 AM »
There is no rotation in FET.

What? I was told otherwise..
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=22567.msg464914#msg464914
You FE:ers really need a unified agenda. Or you dont, so you can confuse everone even more.

Which one is it?  ???

Really RET needs to get together and come up with a common theme for what causes gravity.  Some say mass, some say bend in space/time, some say rotation causes it, some say the magnetic field, other its an unproven thing called gravitrons.  Call me when RE is united.

Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #9 on: September 01, 2008, 11:52:22 AM »
Really RET needs to get together and come up with a common theme for what causes gravity.  Some say mass, some say bend in space/time, some say rotation causes it, some say the magnetic field, other its an unproven thing called gravitrons.  Call me when RE is united.

I would say RE is quite united in the belief that Earth rotates..
Ooompa ooompa

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11842
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #10 on: September 01, 2008, 12:04:02 PM »
Your very right.  I would be also correct in stating that that all FE'ers are united in saying the earth is being accelerated at 9.8 m/s^2.

Your turn.

Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #11 on: September 01, 2008, 12:41:45 PM »
We are talking about whether earth is rotating or not.
Your answer is no. Ok, ive written that down very carefully in my blue little notebook.

Ill check here in a week, see if something happened.
Ooompa ooompa

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11842
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #12 on: September 01, 2008, 12:44:36 PM »
Sounds good.  See you in a week.

*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10061
Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #13 on: September 01, 2008, 01:05:19 PM »
I just wanted to work out what forces that work on us here on earths surface..



Missed anything?

1. UA pushed from below.
2. No rotation.
3. Gravity isn't caused by rotation.  See signature.  And besides, no gravity.

Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #14 on: September 01, 2008, 01:35:21 PM »
Really RET needs to get together and come up with a common theme for what causes gravity.  Some say mass, some say bend in space/time, some say rotation causes it, some say the magnetic field, other its an unproven thing called gravitrons.  Call me when RE is united.

First off, people who say the things in red are idiots.

Secondly, and more importantly, I will debunk your point with an analogy: What causes a car to move? Some would say petrol, some would say explosions in the engine, some would say the wheels turning, some would say friction, some would say chemical reactions...

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11842
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #15 on: September 01, 2008, 01:37:51 PM »
The problem with your analogy is that all of those are correct.  All the different versions of gravity are not.

?

dyno

  • 562
Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #16 on: September 01, 2008, 07:59:59 PM »
But when you say that RE should unify their theory of gravitation you refer to those of us posting on this board. Generally not physicists.
Why the hell would we know?

The FEs however advocate themselves as experts on the FE

Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #17 on: September 01, 2008, 10:24:00 PM »
i dont know about you guys, but my balls dont stick to any plates.
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #18 on: September 01, 2008, 10:32:19 PM »
I just wanted to work out what forces that work on us here on earths surface..



Missed anything?
You RE'ers' ideas...

Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #19 on: September 03, 2008, 08:54:14 PM »
Really RET needs to get together and come up with a common theme for what causes gravity.  Some say mass, some say bend in space/time, some say rotation causes it, some say the magnetic field, other its an unproven thing called gravitrons.  Call me when RE is united.

You're just being a troll. If you were serious you'd ignore idiots who post crap they know nothing about instead of inflamming folks here who are trying to be genuine in finding flaws in FE.

But... if you can dish it out...

Really FET needs to get together and come up with a common theme for whether it's possible to see ships apparently sink beyond the horizon. Some FEers say "yes" (eg bendy light) and some say no (eg rowbotham experiments). Call me when FE is united.

Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #20 on: September 04, 2008, 12:19:13 AM »
Call me when FE is united.

post up your number - ill make sure we call you.
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

?

Holy crap!?!

  • 37
  • can't...look...away.....
Re: Forces on you and me (w illustration)
« Reply #21 on: September 04, 2008, 12:15:26 PM »
There is no rotation in FET.

Rotation was used to explain ocean waves/tides in another thread. I've also read where they're caused by a slight tilting of the earth.

What is the prevailing stance of FE for ocean waves? When I used the search feature the main topic concerning the subject that I found was the one that suggested the earth rotates.