Forces on you and me (w illustration)

I just wanted to work out what forces that work on us here on earths surface..



Missed anything?

The UA's below us. Your thing wouldn't work at all.

The UA's below us. Your thing wouldn't work at all.

Its the direction of the red arrows that matters.. Ive just showed the direction of resulting force on the person.

There is no rotation in FET.

Every single arrow on that thing is the wrong way round.

UA pushes up from below.
Gravity (if FE'ers admit that it exists) pulls inwards (and isn't caused by rotation).
Cenripetal force is inwards (in order to maintain circular motion).

There is no rotation in FET.

What? I was told otherwise..
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=22567.msg464914#msg464914
You FE:ers really need a unified agenda. Or you dont, so you can confuse everone even more.

Which one is it?  

Every single arrow on that thing is the wrong way round.

I believe not.

UA pushes up from below.

*sigh* I know that. It accelerates earth upwards, the resulting felt force on the guy in the illustration is down.

Gravity (if FE'ers admit that it exists) pulls inwards (and isn't caused by rotation).

The arrows points inwards.
And some think its caused by rotation.

Cenripetal force is inwards (in order to maintain circular motion).

Once again, ive illustrated the force acting on "you and me", the guy in the illustration.

I dont know whats hard to understand with my illustration. Its really simple, its simple because ive made it.

Put a ball on a plate, accelerate the plate towards the ball, ball stick to plate. If youre the ball you feel pushed towards the plate.
Rotate the plate, ball rolls of the plate. If youre the ball, you feel dragged out the edge.

Quote from: WardoggKC130FE on September 01, 2008, 11:17:48 AM

There is no rotation in FET.

What? I was told otherwise..
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=22567.msg464914#msg464914
You FE:ers really need a unified agenda. Or you dont, so you can confuse everone even more.

Which one is it?  

Really RET needs to get together and come up with a common theme for what causes gravity.  Some say mass, some say bend in space/time, some say rotation causes it, some say the magnetic field, other its an unproven thing called gravitrons.  Call me when RE is united.

Really RET needs to get together and come up with a common theme for what causes gravity.  Some say mass, some say bend in space/time, some say rotation causes it, some say the magnetic field, other its an unproven thing called gravitrons.  Call me when RE is united.

I would say RE is quite united in the belief that Earth rotates..

Your very right.  I would be also correct in stating that that all FE'ers are united in saying the earth is being accelerated at 9.8 m/s^2.

Your turn.

We are talking about whether earth is rotating or not.
Your answer is no. Ok, ive written that down very carefully in my blue little notebook.

Ill check here in a week, see if something happened.

Sounds good.  See you in a week.

I just wanted to work out what forces that work on us here on earths surface..



Missed anything?

1. UA pushed from below.
2. No rotation.
3. Gravity isn't caused by rotation.  See signature.  And besides, no gravity.

Really RET needs to get together and come up with a common theme for what causes gravity.  Some say mass, some say bend in space/time, some say rotation causes it, some say the magnetic field, other its an unproven thing called gravitrons.  Call me when RE is united.

First off, people who say the things in red are idiots.

Secondly, and more importantly, I will debunk your point with an analogy: What causes a car to move? Some would say petrol, some would say explosions in the engine, some would say the wheels turning, some would say friction, some would say chemical reactions...

The problem with your analogy is that all of those are correct.  All the different versions of gravity are not.

But when you say that RE should unify their theory of gravitation you refer to those of us posting on this board. Generally not physicists.
Why the hell would we know?

The FEs however advocate themselves as experts on the FE

i dont know about you guys, but my balls dont stick to any plates.

I just wanted to work out what forces that work on us here on earths surface..



Missed anything?

You RE'ers' ideas...

Really RET needs to get together and come up with a common theme for what causes gravity.  Some say mass, some say bend in space/time, some say rotation causes it, some say the magnetic field, other its an unproven thing called gravitrons.  Call me when RE is united.

You're just being a troll. If you were serious you'd ignore idiots who post crap they know nothing about instead of inflamming folks here who are trying to be genuine in finding flaws in FE.

But... if you can dish it out...

Really FET needs to get together and come up with a common theme for whether it's possible to see ships apparently sink beyond the horizon. Some FEers say "yes" (eg bendy light) and some say no (eg rowbotham experiments). Call me when FE is united.

Call me when FE is united.

post up your number - ill make sure we call you.

There is no rotation in FET.

Rotation was used to explain ocean waves/tides in another thread. I've also read where they're caused by a slight tilting of the earth.

What is the prevailing stance of FE for ocean waves? When I used the search feature the main topic concerning the subject that I found was the one that suggested the earth rotates.