Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.

  • 14 Replies
  • 2143 Views
?

Atheist Antagonist

  • 13
  • PREPARE FOR TROUBLE! AND MAKE IT DOUBLE!
I'm looking at you, Osama Bin Laden. I admire how subtly you cut me off before I could get a decent argument in. This forum isn't neutral; it's a one-sided totalitarian state designed to shelter those who are too weak-minded to accept the vastness of the THREE-DIMENSIONAL universe.

Anyway, back to the business of my previous topic:
Quote
Q: "What's underneath the Earth?" aka "What's on the bottom?" aka "What's on the other side?"

A: This is unknown. Some believe it to be just rocks, others believe the Earth rests on the back of four elephants and a turtle.

^This is hardly a satisfactory answer. Surely you can do better than that.^
I LIVE TO DISPEL THE STUPIDITY OF THE IGNORANT MASSES

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.
« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2008, 09:45:29 PM »
It's not satisfactory that we don't know what's under it? ???
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2008, 09:46:05 PM »
until someone rappels there and checks it out - no one knows.
explained in the FAQ.
lurk MOAR.
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.
« Reply #3 on: August 31, 2008, 09:48:36 PM »
I'm looking at you, Osama Bin Laden. I admire how subtly you cut me off before I could get a decent argument in. This forum isn't neutral; it's a one-sided totalitarian state designed to shelter those who are too weak-minded to accept the vastness of the THREE-DIMENSIONAL universe.
You're one-sided. Why don't you think about it this way: maybe the topic in my thread has been mentioned, maybe that's the reason why it is locked.

Oh, and mods can tolerate stupidity only to a certain extent.

?

Atheist Antagonist

  • 13
  • PREPARE FOR TROUBLE! AND MAKE IT DOUBLE!
Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.
« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2008, 09:54:34 PM »
It's not satisfactory that we don't know what's under it? ???

It's not satisfactory that nobody has bothered seriously pursuing an answer. You don't need to go directly to a place to see what's there. There must be some means of examining the world around us and coming up with at least an educated guess. Even speculation would do for me if it explained something. Then at least you'd be trying. I mean, the rest of the FE theory is speculation. A little more couldn't hurt, could it?
I LIVE TO DISPEL THE STUPIDITY OF THE IGNORANT MASSES

?

Atheist Antagonist

  • 13
  • PREPARE FOR TROUBLE! AND MAKE IT DOUBLE!
Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.
« Reply #5 on: August 31, 2008, 10:06:43 PM »
It's not satisfactory that we don't know what's under it? ???

It's not satisfactory that nobody has bothered seriously pursuing an answer. You don't need to go directly to a place to see what's there. There must be some means of examining the world around us and coming up with at least an educated guess. Even speculation would do for me if it explained something. Then at least you'd be trying. I mean, the rest of the FE theory is speculation. A little more couldn't hurt, could it?

EDIT: I've read through the FAQ, and I find the answers stupid and paranoid. Most of them are rediculously flimsy, many of them are vague, and some of them even avoid the questions outright. If you don't know the answer, don't try to make it look like you do.
Additionally, the logic behind what Professor Gaypenguin wants us to post is seriously flawed. Of particular concern to me is this article:
Quote
Is it a sensible questioning of the theory behind Flat Earth?

I can see that you only want us RE'ers to post insensible questions, crippling our arguments from the start. You FE'ers are really poor sports, you know that?
I LIVE TO DISPEL THE STUPIDITY OF THE IGNORANT MASSES

Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.
« Reply #6 on: September 01, 2008, 01:18:20 AM »
I'm looking at you, Osama Bin Laden. I admire how subtly you cut me off before I could get a decent argument in. This forum isn't neutral; it's a one-sided totalitarian state designed to shelter those who are too weak-minded to accept the vastness of the THREE-DIMENSIONAL universe.
First, you're not looking at him.
Second, we would love someone to bring a decent argument in. Generally though people come here post the same rubbish that's been answered hundreds of time before. It gets old real quick.
Third, of course this forum isn't neutral. It's a privately owned domain, and can be run any damn way the owner chooses.
Lastly, I do not believe there is anyone here who doesn't think the Universe is both vast, and THREE-DIMENSIONAL.
Quote from: General Douchebag[/quote
If Eminem had actually died, I would feel the force realign.
Quote from: ghazwozza
Of course it doesn't make sense, it's Tom Bishop's answer.

?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.
« Reply #7 on: September 01, 2008, 02:01:37 AM »
I am an RE'er, and I think the theory: It's a cylinder, full of magma, and with rocks at the bottom, is "good enough", what else do you want?
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences

Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.
« Reply #8 on: September 01, 2008, 07:01:36 AM »
I am an RE'er, and I think the theory: It's a cylinder, full of magma, and with rocks at the bottom, is "good enough", what else do you want?

Nice job, but try reading the FAQ.
Imperious, choleric, irascible, extreme in everything, with a dissolute imagination the like of which has never been seen, atheistic to the point of fanaticism, there you have me in a nutshell.... Kill me again or take me as I am, for I shall not change.

?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.
« Reply #9 on: September 01, 2008, 05:16:51 PM »
I am an RE'er, and I think the theory: It's a cylinder, full of magma, and with rocks at the bottom, is "good enough", what else do you want?

Nice job, but try reading the FAQ.

Nice job, but I read the first day I arrived here. Besides, try getting an agreement between you members of the FES in SOMETHING.
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences

Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.
« Reply #10 on: September 01, 2008, 05:43:53 PM »
I am an RE'er, and I think the theory: It's a cylinder, full of magma, and with rocks at the bottom, is "good enough", what else do you want?

Nice job, but try reading the FAQ.

Nice job, but I read the first day I arrived here. Besides, try getting an agreement between you members of the FES in SOMETHING.
thats not true.
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.
« Reply #11 on: September 02, 2008, 01:50:43 AM »
I am an RE'er, and I think the theory: It's a cylinder, full of magma, and with rocks at the bottom, is "good enough", what else do you want?

Nice job, but try reading the FAQ.

Nice job, but I read the first day I arrived here. Besides, try getting an agreement between you members of the FES in SOMETHING.
thats not true.

Yep, it is, you don't agree, that i can remember right now just awaken, in the shape of earth (Some say it's infinite), the shape of the ice wall (one, or double, or smth like that I've heard), and what's beneath the earth. It's ok the FE is a theory, but as a theory, it should have some strong and clear points. And the points I know you all agree are: The particles that bend light are undetectable and the DE exists but we can't explain.
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences

Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.
« Reply #12 on: September 02, 2008, 08:47:51 AM »
I am an RE'er, and I think the theory: It's a cylinder, full of magma, and with rocks at the bottom, is "good enough", what else do you want?

Nice job, but try reading the FAQ.

Nice job, but I read the first day I arrived here. Besides, try getting an agreement between you members of the FES in SOMETHING.
thats not true.

Yep, it is, you don't agree, that i can remember right now just awaken, in the shape of earth (Some say it's infinite), the shape of the ice wall (one, or double, or smth like that I've heard), and what's beneath the earth. It's ok the FE is a theory, but as a theory, it should have some strong and clear points. And the points I know you all agree are: The particles that bend light are undetectable and the DE exists but we can't explain.
you forgot the earth is flat part.
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.
« Reply #13 on: September 02, 2008, 11:49:45 AM »
I'm looking at you, Osama Bin Laden. I admire how subtly you cut me off before I could get a decent argument in. This forum isn't neutral; it's a one-sided totalitarian state designed to shelter those who are too weak-minded to accept the vastness of the THREE-DIMENSIONAL universe.
You're one-sided. Why don't you think about it this way: maybe the topic in my thread has been mentioned, maybe that's the reason why it is locked.

Oh, and mods can tolerate stupidity only to a certain extent.

then why arent all the FE's banned?
i believe the world is an oblate spheroid. anything i say that contradicts this is purely for the sake of argument.

?

Kira-SY

  • 1139
  • Ja pierdole!
Re: Thank you for locking my topic before I got a chance to respond.
« Reply #14 on: September 02, 2008, 11:54:51 AM »
I am an RE'er, and I think the theory: It's a cylinder, full of magma, and with rocks at the bottom, is "good enough", what else do you want?

Nice job, but try reading the FAQ.

Nice job, but I read the first day I arrived here. Besides, try getting an agreement between you members of the FES in SOMETHING.
thats not true.

Yep, it is, you don't agree, that i can remember right now just awaken, in the shape of earth (Some say it's infinite), the shape of the ice wall (one, or double, or smth like that I've heard), and what's beneath the earth. It's ok the FE is a theory, but as a theory, it should have some strong and clear points. And the points I know you all agree are: The particles that bend light are undetectable and the DE exists but we can't explain.
you forgot the earth is flat part.

Captain Obvious to the rescue.
Signature under building process, our apologies for the inconveniences