meteors

  • 35 Replies
  • 3841 Views
*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: meteors
« Reply #30 on: September 21, 2008, 03:39:12 AM »
Until then, stop refuting FE.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: meteors
« Reply #31 on: September 21, 2008, 04:46:16 AM »
I'll refute what's in the FAQ. If you think it's worthy, put it in the FAQ. What I can't stand is all this gibberish about how gravity exists to one FE'er, but not to another, how there's this DE or DEF to one group, but not another, and how there's a wobbling fricking disk to some but not others.

It's like being an orderly in a lunatic assylum and all the nutters wants to stroke your arm.

From now on, if it's not in the FAQ, it's not discussed. I suggest all other RE'ers do likewise.
You're talking as if everyone should follow your way. FES is a place to share ideas. There's no such thing as a "Grand Unified Theory of FE" because, as brought up by BBC news, there are FE'ers who have their own idea of our world. For example, Dogplatter and Username share the same boat, but they have their own theories of FE (one believes a finite disc while the other believes an infinite plane, respectively).

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6903
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: meteors
« Reply #32 on: September 21, 2008, 05:15:51 AM »
No, from what I understand, the meteors lose there electromagnetic properties and the DE stops acting upon them.  Then the earth accelerates up to them.  There are other threads about this.

You went on to quote Tom; enough said. I like my explanation better.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: meteors
« Reply #33 on: September 21, 2008, 08:50:22 AM »
From now on, if it's not in the FAQ, it's not discussed. I suggest all other RE'ers do likewise.

RET isn't in the FAQ, so let's not discuss that either. Another victory for FE!
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: meteors
« Reply #34 on: September 21, 2008, 08:53:22 AM »
RET isn't in the FAQ, so let's not discuss that either. Another victory for FE!
That's win.

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: meteors
« Reply #35 on: September 21, 2008, 11:40:11 AM »
I disagree.  Just because such rules are unknown doesn't mean they don't exist.

Until you figure out such rules, your hypotheses require divine intervention.

::)
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?